• About
  • Login to comment
    • Facebook
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Perfumers
  • Perfume Houses
  • Shop for perfume
  • Resources

Calvin Klein Secret Obsession ~ perfume review

Posted by Robin on 3 September 2008 85 Comments

Eva Mendes for Calvin Klein Secret Obsession

1985's Obsession, from Calvin Klein, was meant to capture the "essence of the 1980's obsession with carnal and material gratification"; Secret Obsession, the brand's latest feminine fragrance, hopes to update that notion for modern times, to "become the meaning of what is sexy today — more personal, sophisticated and intoxicating".* If Secret Obsession fails in that mission it won't be the fault of Eva Mendes, who gamely writhes and moans in (presumably) perfumed ecstasy, and shows just enough nipple to get the advertising spot banned from television, thus ensuring that a bajillion people will watch it on YouTube at no expense whatsoever to Coty.

Like the original Obsession, Secret Obsession is a floriental, but the two scents are not meant to be related in any way other than the name, and in the event, they don't share anything much other than an amber-y base and an overtly sensuous character. Secret Obsession has a sweet, fruity opening that smells entirely of today; still, don't go looking for the sparkling and sheer pinkish berries that decorate so many of the fruity florals of the past five years. These fruits are spicy and overripe. It's not quite Rochas Femme or Frederic Malle Le Parfum de Thérèse, mind you, but it smells more grown-up than I expected.

Calvin Klein Secret Obsession fragrance bottleThe dry down is a sweet floral (the notes: exotic plum, mace, rose de damas, jasmine, orange flower, tuberose, cashmere woods, burnt amber, vanilla and sandalwood). The rose is center-stage very briefly in the early dry down, after that, it's more of a hothouse, tuberose-ish floral, but it lacks the richness and depth of Obsession's floral heart — it's a bit loud, but has a more modern, stylised feel. While I don't find it unpleasant, I've seen more than one remark comparing it to hairspray.

What hairspray there is largely disappears within an hour; then Secret Obsession is a (relatively) quiet amber-y musky woods, medium-dark, spiced and honeyed but not overly sweet (although the fruit notes, which get buried under the flowers for a time, seem to reappear in the final stages). It's sultry without the bitter edges that render Obsession an unlikely sell in today's youth-oriented market. It isn't a shy scent, but it isn't quite so overwhelming as Obsession, and it's considerably more subtle (and arguably, sexier) than Calvin Klein's last stab at this market, Euphoria.

Secret Obsession is nicely done, and it's always agreeable to smell something that's supposed to be sexy and is — so many "sexy" fragrances turn out to smell like candy (see Jessica Simpson Fancy) or laundry detergent musk (see Tommy Hilfiger Dreaming). Still, I've been wearing Secret Obsession along with the original Obsession for a week, off and on, and it hasn't really captured my affections; the far dry down is lovely, rather like a tarted-up version of Estee Lauder's Sensuous, but the overripe fruits and the hothouse florals in the earlier stages have been done better elsewhere. Instead, I've become more impressed with Obsession than I had been. I had the idea that layering the two might be perfect, but I can't recommend that anyone try that at home: the resulting brew is perfect after a couple of hours, but up until then it can only be described as nasty, and it's potent enough to kill passersby at 20 paces.

Calvin Klein Secret Obsession was developed by perfumer Calice Becker, and is available in 30, 50 and 100 ml Eau de Parfum and in matching body products.

* First quote via scentdirect, second quote via wwd.

Possibly of interest

Calvin Klein Deep Euphoria ~ fragrance review
Calvin Klein CK2 ~ fragrance review
Top 10 Fall Fragrances 2015

Filed Under: nsfa, perfume talk
Tagged With: calice becker, calvin klein, flanker

Advertisement


85 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. Anonymous says:
    3 September 2008 at 2:34 pm

    As I mentioned in my comment for an article of Obsession from 1980, my friend loves this stuff. I will be showing her both of the articles, she loves her obsession very much. As I said earlier Obsession, either one, is not for me – but I ejoyed reading about them both, thanx Robin!

    Log in to Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    3 September 2008 at 3:25 pm

    She loves the new one too, or just the old? Very curious how long-time Obsession fans will react to the new version.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Anonymous says:
    3 September 2008 at 3:28 pm

    I've enjoyed your posts over the last two days. I admit (embarrassed) I have no idea what Obsession smells like! I will definitely fix that the next time I am at the mall.

    Log in to Reply
  4. Anonymous says:
    3 September 2008 at 3:42 pm

    I have been looking forward to smelling this since I first heard about it. It sounds like it's pretty good jus, no? I wanted to love Sensous but found it a tad too woody and peppery. It smells amazing on my mom though. There are two things not going for this one; Eva,(Yuck!) she's beautiful, don't get me wrong but I find her a bit on the rough side, trashy even, but maybe that's what old Calvin had in mind?! And I think the bottle is hideous. Does it look any better in person? If I end up buying it I would decant it into something else pronto!! Regardless, I will be smelling it this weekend. Sounds like it would be just the thing when the weather finally turns here in Florida…. come January!!!!! :-(

    Log in to Reply
  5. Anonymous says:
    3 September 2008 at 4:01 pm

    Kayliana,

    It isn't my thing, really — I'll take Sensuous over it any day — but I think it's exactly what it's meant to be, if you know what I mean. And yes, would say that on the trashy side is exactly right. That's not always a bad thing, of course.

    I do think it is far better on skin than on paper. At least, I pretty much hated it on paper.

    I have not seen the bottle in person at all — I have a decant.

    Log in to Reply
  6. Anonymous says:
    3 September 2008 at 4:38 pm

    March, thanks. I'm surprised you don't remember Obsession from “the street”!

    Log in to Reply
  7. Anonymous says:
    3 September 2008 at 7:27 pm

    I can't wait to smell this, as I will probably like it (at least a lot more than the original).
    And of course, I LOVE the bottle.
    If this ends up being successful, I hope they roll one out for men too.

    Log in to Reply
  8. Anonymous says:
    3 September 2008 at 8:32 pm

    Robin –

    I realize that this whole masculine/feminine thing with fragrance is “in the eye of the beholder”, but what is your take on the “masculinity” of S.O.? I'm really comfortable wearing Sensuous (wore it today, actually…) and wonder if I might get away with S.O. too…..

    oh….and thanks for the carnation info….I'll be up to my ears in samples soon.

    Marko

    Log in to Reply
  9. Anonymous says:
    3 September 2008 at 8:51 pm

    Hey — I hope they roll out a male version of that commercial, LOL…

    Log in to Reply
  10. Anonymous says:
    3 September 2008 at 8:53 pm

    Hmmm. This is more overtly feminine to me than Sensuous — Sensuous is really only “feminine” because it's sweet. This has much louder florals, and the spicy fruit notes are probably more conventionally feminine too. But at least half the time I comment on the gender issue, I turn out to be wrong, so hope someone will chime in here if I'm wrong again!

    And do let me know which (if any) of those carnations work out!

    Log in to Reply
  11. Anonymous says:
    4 September 2008 at 12:13 am

    This one actually smells okay. Briefly contemplated buying a bottle, but then remembered that I have a gazillion other perfumes at home.

    Log in to Reply
  12. Anonymous says:
    4 September 2008 at 12:38 am

    Oh Robin you truly have a gift for writing! I almost burst out laughing while reading this in class.

    Log in to Reply
  13. Anonymous says:
    4 September 2008 at 1:27 am

    Did they manage to get product placement for this, I wonder, in the new version of “The Women” that's coming out with Mendes as the evil perfume counter girl? (Looks like Nars has a tie-in with some cosmetics, but that's all I could find in a very perfunctory search.)

    Log in to Reply
  14. Anonymous says:
    4 September 2008 at 2:08 am

    Like I said in my own review of it a couple of days ago, it's not especially “sexy” in the common perception of these days (which is a good thing!) nor is it too sweet (another good thing!).

    I found that the mace was most pronounced on my skin, an interesting twist; the florals took a backseat for sure (but their manipulation is taking cues from Songes and Fragile ~a modern interpretation, rather than classical). It's not bad… then again it's not groundbreaking either.

    (And LOL on Coty not spending money when people watch the video for free!)

    It does consolidate what I had predicted while reviewing (and rather panning, I'm afraid, but they deserved it for all the lies behind their teeth) Magnifique by Lancome : that “woods are the new patchouli ” in mainstream perfumery! ;-)

    The bottle looks a bit like ET's face in the photos, doesn't it?

    Log in to Reply
  15. Anonymous says:
    4 September 2008 at 6:10 am

    I wore the original Obsession back in the day but overdid it and can't go near it now. Still I loved it at the time. It was therefore with some trepidation that I tried Secret Obsession but (I think to my relief) I didn't find much, if any, overt relationship betwen the two. I really like the plum note in this one and might shell out for body lotion if such a thing is done. Thanks for the review!

    Log in to Reply
  16. Anonymous says:
    4 September 2008 at 6:48 am

    I will be interested to try this, if I pass a CK counter, but wouldn't go out of my way to sample it.

    I do think the pornographic advertising is a little depressing, though. I'm no prude, and yes, Eva Mendes is gorgeous, but this kind of thing is belittling and degrading to women and would not incline me to be well-disposed to the product or the label. Even the naked and alarmingly youthful Kate Moss in the original Obssession ad looks to have been more tasteful.

    Log in to Reply
  17. Anonymous says:
    4 September 2008 at 7:38 am

    LOL at “then remembered that I have a gazillion other perfumes at home” — yeah, then there's that.

    Log in to Reply
  18. Anonymous says:
    4 September 2008 at 7:43 am

    Thanks, that's very kind.

    Log in to Reply
  19. Anonymous says:
    4 September 2008 at 7:44 am

    Hey, good question — can't wait to see what bottles they display in that perfume department!!

    Log in to Reply
  20. Anonymous says:
    4 September 2008 at 7:46 am

    Interesting, I found it quite overtly sexy. Would entirely agree w/ “not groundbreaking” though.

    Log in to Reply
  21. Anonymous says:
    4 September 2008 at 7:47 am

    A body lotion would be nice — might skip over the parts I don't like!

    Log in to Reply
  22. Anonymous says:
    4 September 2008 at 8:09 am

    Perfume advertising that is “uplifting” to women is so rare that I hardly blink an eye at anything they come up with. This one actually didn't bother me — at least, looking at the still images, I find it less upsetting than the Moss ad, since as you say, Moss looks alarmingly young — and unhealthy to boot.

    Log in to Reply
  23. Anonymous says:
    4 September 2008 at 10:08 am

    OMG!! I see E.T.'s face!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That's crazy!!

    Log in to Reply
  24. Anonymous says:
    4 September 2008 at 10:10 am

    I read elsewhere that it looked like 2 breasts and now that's all I can see. It's funny how these things get stuck in your mind.

    Log in to Reply
  25. Anonymous says:
    4 September 2008 at 11:57 am

    This fragrance was also created by another perfumer/artist, Caroline Sabas.

    Please note.

    Thanks!

    Log in to Reply
  26. Anonymous says:
    4 September 2008 at 12:05 pm

    The bottle looks better than the Obsession bottle, the fragrance smells worse. Watered down and uninteresting.

    Still better than most new fragrances, that I agree.

    Log in to Reply
  27. Anonymous says:
    4 September 2008 at 1:45 pm

    I saw the comment about the breasts also (I think it was a YouTube comment) and yeah… once you see it, there's no turning it back into “E.T.”

    Log in to Reply
  28. Anonymous says:
    4 September 2008 at 11:14 pm

    I'll see if I can check the Michael Edwards database. Osmoz attributes it to Becker.

    Log in to Reply
  29. Anonymous says:
    4 September 2008 at 11:14 pm

    Really, watered down?? I'm surprised, I didn't find it light at all. Not groundbreaking in either case.

    Log in to Reply
  30. Anonymous says:
    4 September 2008 at 11:15 pm

    Yep! And I'd rather see ET.

    Log in to Reply
  31. Anonymous says:
    10 September 2008 at 3:27 pm

    Got a chance to smell this for the first time today. Definitely not watered down. Reminded me a little of Donna Karan's Gold.

    Log in to Reply
  32. Anonymous says:
    11 September 2008 at 10:06 am

    Interesting, wouldn't have thought of them together — will have to try them at the same time!

    Log in to Reply
  33. Anonymous says:
    2 October 2008 at 11:51 am

    I liked this one. I confused myself today, as I was going to buy a bottle of Bvlgari Jasmin Noir, and the sales associate showed my the Secret Obsession. I sprayed the Jasmin Noir on one arm (this is my fifth or sixth time trying this one) and Secret Obsession on the other. And I went home to think about them.
    While I like the Secret Obsession, I love the Jasmin Noir.
    I was impressed none the less.

    Log in to Reply
  34. Anonymous says:
    2 October 2008 at 12:54 pm

    I'm jealous, I can hardly smell the Bvlgari. Sounds like a bottle is in your future :-)

    Log in to Reply
  35. Anonymous says:
    14 October 2008 at 4:04 am

    There's a bit of happiness in smelling Secret Obsession for me. To me, I'm smelling an affirmation of the reawakening of a style of fragrance that incorporates the smell of sophistication and a pared down version of bold, sexy scents of the 80's. This smells like a quiet version of David Yurman's creation, only lighter to accomodate a chunk of the younger crowd. I find the tuberose a bit indolic when it emerges, but it's all part of its sultry beauty without creating an overwheling presence. Overall, I think it deserves a louder personality, but even then it won't possess the bold unapologetic presence of the original that has left its own unique mark in history.

    Which leads me to think…has the mainstream perfume industry been forced to create more scents of irony? Scents that lack presence and possess little personality? Why bother creating anything if it doesn't create a distinct trail?

    I don't understand it. People will dress in anything these days but refuse to stink so good. They've come out with Secret Obsession. Hopefully this means the consumer will demand bolder, unique perfumes.

    Log in to Reply
  36. Anonymous says:
    14 October 2008 at 1:37 pm

    “People will dress in anything these days but refuse to stink so good” — a very interesting observation, never thought of it that way but it's entirely true. I suppose the other way of looking at it is that you no longer need your perfume to make the association with sexy, do you? You can do it by wearing overly sexy clothing.

    Log in to Reply
  37. Anonymous says:
    16 October 2008 at 10:48 am

    Smelled this on paper the other day (used to wear Obsession in the '80s) and expected to loathe this as I can't bear Obsession anymore. It was surprisingly lovely. I didn't “skin test” it because I was wearing a Montale and well, that would just be rude to dear Pierre. But I plan on returning sans Montale to try it out. It is nothing at all like the original Obsession and I highly recommend trying it. Agree with previous reviewer that it was refreshing to try an unabashedly sexy fragrance. Soooooo tired of caramels and cucmbers!!!

    Log in to Reply
  38. Anonymous says:
    16 October 2008 at 11:38 am

    This is not bad! Better than the notoriously un-notorious-like Notorius, another sexy-woods American launch. To my nose, it's almost like a junior Feminite du Bois without the cedar; it's got similar plum-orange blossom-spice-wood notes to it. Loving FdB as much as I do — and finding it hard to find these days — it's nice to know there's something out there that's in the ballpark.

    I don't find the ad objectionable, but neither do I find it especially inspirational.

    Robin, if you're listening: we've been talking a bit here and there about Japon Noir, which has gotten under my skin in a dangerous way. Can you think of anything similar that's not so spendy? I'm thinking Kyoto and Ouarzazate, but you're exposed to so much more than I am in terms of niche scents, so no doubt have a few superior ideas. . .Thanks!

    Log in to Reply
  39. Anonymous says:
    16 October 2008 at 5:04 pm

    Hollyc, I'm cracking up at “rude to dear Pierre”! Hope you'll like it on skin when you get the chance to try it.

    Log in to Reply
  40. Anonymous says:
    16 October 2008 at 5:10 pm

    A “junior Feminite du Bois” is a good description.

    On Japon Noir, gosh, can't think of anything offhand (and it doesn't remind me of either of those CdGs). I mean, I can think of other spicy ambery leathery things, but nothing close enough to scratch that same itch, and certainly nothing like but cheaper. So much for my superior ideas, LOL…

    Log in to Reply
  41. Anonymous says:
    17 October 2008 at 2:14 pm

    Darn! I was afraid of that.

    LOL at “nothing close enough to scatch that same itch.”

    Must look behind sofa cushions in search of lost quarters to start saving up. . .Looking forward to your review — hint, hint — of the whole Tom Ford Private Blend line. It's interesting, methinks. . .I'm diggin' Black Violet, and I can see why Tobacco Vanille and Noir de Noir are getting some buzz. . .Velvet Gardenia is hyper-buttery, over-the-top rich. . .So spendy, these ones, but very concentrated, and, as you mentioned vis-a-vis Japon Noir, they seen to scratch a very exclusive itch.

    Log in to Reply
  42. Anonymous says:
    18 October 2008 at 9:41 am

    R, whew, don't go looking for reviews of all of them! I can hardly keep up with the new stuff. And, I really do like some of them but not sure I adore them as much as some people do. Do think he's filling a gap though — by & large these are rich, deep scents, in a very different vein than many other niche lines are doing right now.

    Log in to Reply
  43. Anonymous says:
    18 October 2008 at 11:34 am

    Awwwwww!! (Tries to hide disappointment.)

    Just teasing, R. I do understand. As it is, I don't know how you do manage to keep up. I guess that the Tom Fords are just new to me, but in fact they've been around for awhile, so they're really not a fresh story to tackle anway. I was just being selfish; I really respect your opinions on stuff, and they sway me in the best possible way whenever I'm contemplating parting with a significant wad of moolah.

    Funny. The Tom Fords are positioned on their own little free-standing pedestal at Holt Renfrew, directly beside the Jo Malones. Talk about contrast. In fact, when I asked where the TFs were (not having my glasses on and therefore not being able to see beyond an arm's length) the JM woman pointed to them with a little shudder. “They're VERY strong,” she grimaced.

    Log in to Reply
  44. Anonymous says:
    20 October 2008 at 9:17 am

    LOL — that's too funny — the VERY strong part.

    And do bear in mind that I haven't even smelled all of the TFs yet. I really *don't* manage to keep up!

    Log in to Reply
  45. Anonymous says:
    24 October 2008 at 10:34 am

    I wiped a perfumed strip from a magazine across my wrist and I thought it smelled like smoke. Not “smoky”, just smoke, like from a fireplace, burning logs. it was….. oddly sensual.

    Log in to Reply
  46. Anonymous says:
    24 October 2008 at 10:38 am

    I don't know what it is with the Bvlgari scents, and I mean almost all of them that I have tried in Neimans, butafter owning Elixir de Merveilles and spraying myself with other Hermes scents, like

    24 Faubourg, and knowing what complex scents do over time on my wrist, I just find the Bvlgari's ….. forgive me, but “common”. Almost like a book, where the title is exactly what the book is about, nothing more intricate. they just don't work for me. Even though the packaging is pretty elegant, esp the squat bottles like the Vert Extreme.

    Log in to Reply
  47. Anonymous says:
    24 October 2008 at 9:13 pm

    Interesting…I don't get much smoke from the liquid form, but maybe you will!

    Log in to Reply
  48. Anonymous says:
    9 November 2008 at 10:01 pm

    hahaha this is the funniest thread ever!! I was in fits of laughter already from “Eva Mendes… gamely writhes and moans in (presumably) perfumed ecstasy” ROFL

    and then likening the bottle to ET's face that is THE funniest ha hahaha!

    Anyway, I came to this review to add that I just smelled Secret Obsession yesterday – having heard nothing about what it was supposed to smell like I was pleasantly surprised to find it's a floral! I really liked the tuberose/sherbet/jasmin/gardenia/magnolia bouquet, although it's not quite creamy/floral/heady enough for me (i prefer estee lauder tuberose gardenia, for example – this one's a bit Fracas like I thought) so I wouldn't buy it but I thought it was quite lovely!

    Althought the writhing and moaning and nudity is just OH so DONE, I much prefer it over that horrendous Tom Ford advertising ughgh!

    Log in to Reply
  49. Anonymous says:
    10 November 2008 at 1:08 pm

    Glad to provide a laugh, and glad you were happily surprised by the SO, even if not enough to buy. I like the EL better too.

    Log in to Reply
  50. Anonymous says:
    11 November 2008 at 1:18 pm

    Such a good thread! My first thought in seeing the bottle was that it looked like an upside-down bladder. Kinda ruined the juice for me.

    Log in to Reply
  51. Anonymous says:
    11 November 2008 at 4:40 pm

    LOL — that kinda ruins it for me too ;-)

    Log in to Reply
  52. Anonymous says:
    15 November 2008 at 11:06 am

    I agree. I always want to like Bvlgari scents. But i always feel there's something missing. I did really enjoy Bvlgari Blu Notte for a little while….until I read that someone said it smelled like a diaper. Buzzkill. Couldn't wear it again. LOL

    Log in to Reply
  53. Anonymous says:
    15 November 2008 at 11:15 am

    I've had a helluva time trying to find a winter scent that I actually like after more than one wearing. I have a love/hate relationship with orientals. Most that I try just end up being too cloying. I tried Secret Obsessioin and fell in like with it, so I purchased it. I enjoy the florientals. I think it's a nice balance….opens dark and sweet and finishes a bit fresh and ambery.

    However – this has to have the worst sillage EVER. I even up'd my squirts the other day to test it. Two sprays on each side of my neck….and two on each wrist. That's 8 squirts. At the end of my work day, I couldn't smell anything……not even a trace on my sweater. What perfume doesn't stick to a sweater??

    Just curious what anyone else's experience has been if they've purchased this one. Wanting to see if I'm crazy or perhaps getting a cold.

    Log in to Reply
  54. Anonymous says:
    16 November 2008 at 5:00 am

    I for one love this new addition to the Obsession line. It's a unique addition that takes the base of the original and “spices it up” literally. I love that this perfume is distinct and stands out on its own. It's fun and sexy and become a fast favorite of mine.

    Jenny

    Log in to Reply
  55. Anonymous says:
    16 November 2008 at 12:53 pm

    Gosh, I find 1 spray pretty potent. I think maybe you're getting olfactory fatigue — perhaps you need to ask someone else if they can still smell it at the end of the day.

    Log in to Reply
  56. Anonymous says:
    16 November 2008 at 12:54 pm

    Glad you like it :-)

    Log in to Reply
  57. Anonymous says:
    17 November 2008 at 8:42 am

    I really loved original Obsession. Today, although I have a full new bottle, I don't use it so often, it seems more synthetic to me than 10 years ago. I wonder is it me (did I spoilt my nose with organic Ambre Sultan) , or they altered the original juice?

    Secret Obsession was a disappointment . First, it starts too sweet, and like someone else said, after a while it seems watered down. Because of a strong plum note it immediately reminded me of : (Feminite du Bois – cedar part + lot more sugar) and all that together watered down too much. Like some very cheap far East fake of Feminite. Maybe on someone elses skin it smells better than that. Bottle is beautiful, though.

    Log in to Reply
  58. Anonymous says:
    17 November 2008 at 7:02 pm

    They've almost certainly reformulated the original by now, yes, but yes, you've probably also spoilt your nose w/ Ambre Sultan :-)

    Log in to Reply
  59. Anonymous says:
    19 November 2008 at 10:40 pm

    I think you're definitely right! I took a break from it for a couple days. Sprayed a couple squirts on some fabric and smelled it the next morning…..lasting power was fine.

    My poor cube-mates…I must've tortured them last week. LOL

    Log in to Reply
  60. Anonymous says:
    20 November 2008 at 8:23 am

    Oh good. I think this is one of the many reasons why it might be best to alternate fragrances…most overuse is probably due to the same olfactory fatigue you experienced!

    Log in to Reply
  61. Anonymous says:
    21 November 2008 at 2:49 pm

    Hi Robin,

    I have a tendency to buy UNSMELLED perfume based on the reviews I read. Just had my birthday and had this on my wishlist. Got it – and don't like it. To my simple nose it smells – eh – perfumish, VERY mature and nothing I would imagine Eva Mendes would smell like (or like to wear).

    The original Obsession smells nice, but it's too heavy for my taste. I wanted a special scent, as Obsession is, and when reading that Secret Obsession was more subtle I gave it a go.

    I'm sorry i did, and I'm trying hard as I can to get rid of it!

    Does anyone have any suggestions for what I MIGHT like??

    As I have a 3-year old I don't wear much perfume, but when I do I tend to use; Laura Biagottis Laura, Flowerbomb (but it makes me a little… sick perhaps?), Kenzo Amour, Armani Diamonds (thought WOW when I first sniffed it, but now I find it quite boring), Guess Gold (also thought WOW in sniffing it in the store, but used it two or three times). I'm a Vanilla-girl, and I even like the vanilla-scent from The Body Shop. Used it for years, but as I'm now 35 it feels a little too young for me (and too sweet). I absolutely LOVE Calyx – but it tickles my nose and makes me sneeze.

    Miss the 80's. Everybody wore Diors Poison, and in the 90's we wore Jean Paul Gaultier. Everything was so easy then :-/

    I WANNA HAVE A SIGNATURE SMELL, but can't seem to find any I absolutely like :-/

    Thought about buying Burberry Weekend, but I'm afraid it will smell a little too citrus(?)

    Can anyone help? Any suggestions??

    Thanks!

    Mira

    Log in to Reply
  62. Anonymous says:
    21 November 2008 at 8:22 pm

    Mira, why don't you take a look at the Monday Mail articles, sounds like you're a good candidate:

    https://nstperfume.com/blog/_WebPages/GeneralPerfumeArticles.html#MM

    If you're interested, email me (nowsmellthis at comcast dot net) and we can get you on the calendar for January.

    Log in to Reply
  63. Anonymous says:
    23 December 2008 at 2:30 pm

    hi robin! seeing as how u reviewed this fragrance, i have a question for u. i recently bought this for my sister for her bday and she really likes it but she feels that a guy could easily wear it. i told her she was crazy and that its definately just a womens fragrance. is she crazy or can a guy easily pull this off?

    Log in to Reply
  64. Anonymous says:
    24 December 2008 at 5:42 pm

    Yes! ;-)

    Log in to Reply
  65. Anonymous says:
    24 December 2008 at 11:02 pm

    Well, to each his own, but I find this pretty darned feminine myself. Maybe the right guy could pull it off, but it isn't something I'd call obviously unisex (?)

    Log in to Reply
  66. Anonymous says:
    3 January 2009 at 8:28 pm

    Hi would anyone reccomend this as a gift for a 17 year old?
    It for her birthday off ne thanks

    Log in to Reply
  67. Anonymous says:
    4 January 2009 at 10:12 am

    Well, I dont' know that I'd buy it as a gift for anyone if I didn't know their taste — and not sure it's the sort of scent that would be widely popular with that age group.

    Log in to Reply
  68. Anonymous says:
    20 January 2009 at 1:24 am

    My mom bought me this fragrance for my birthday. She picked it out in her search to find a fragrance that she thought would be right for me. But i have mixed feelings about it…to me its kind of a mix of hairspray and a sweet rich fruity liqueur. The dry down is nice, and i like that its a perfume that has so many stages of development, where as some other perfumes basically smell the same the whole time. In the final stages it is warm and spicy but still very floral.
    I think that it will grow on me, and if my mom picked it out for me, that must mean something right? It's quite a dark strong smell, and I think i would have to be in the right mood to wear it. A strong, romantic, sexy mood. Or maybe when i'm in a daring, slightly dark mood haha! But seriously, it's not a perfume to be taken lightly, it has a bold character. I would recommend trying it.

    Log in to Reply
  69. Anonymous says:
    20 January 2009 at 11:50 am

    Hope it will grow on you — but it's so hard to pick out the right fragrance for someone else, so hope you won't feel bad if you never fall in love with it.

    Log in to Reply
  70. Anonymous says:
    29 January 2009 at 4:08 pm

    My daughter and I were in Macy's today and sniffed this on a card and we were both intrigued enough to ask for samples so we can try it later when we don't have other perfume on. I immediately got a spicey feel [nutmeg-y] – my daughter got a bourbon-y note. She said it was like alcohol and Christmas cookies which I thought was so cute. I just smelled the card again and I'm getting a blast of gardenia now. I look forward to actually wearing this tomorrow and then see what I think.

    Log in to Reply
  71. Anonymous says:
    30 January 2009 at 11:23 am

    Did you wear it on skin yet?

    Log in to Reply
  72. Anonymous says:
    30 January 2009 at 3:39 pm

    Well, it is now the following day and I wore this fragrance today. I love it. This is a perfect cold weather scent for me. I love the spiciness and lushness I'm getting. It really lasts too which is a bonus for me – my sense of smell gets fatigued very quickly usually [unfortunately] and I'm so happy that I can still actually enjoy this so late in the day. I'm a fan! :-)

    Log in to Reply
  73. Anonymous says:
    31 January 2009 at 10:42 am

    Sounds perfect for you — that's great!

    Log in to Reply
  74. Anonymous says:
    12 February 2009 at 4:43 pm

    Well, I now have a [big] bottle. I wonder why I get gardenia from this? I don't see that mentioned as a note in any description I come across. Anyway, I just spritzed with abandon and I'm feeling quite satisfied with myself! Just in time too – I needed some aromatherapy today.

    Log in to Reply
  75. Anonymous says:
    12 February 2009 at 11:22 pm

    Maybe it's the tuberose? Don't know…but glad you got yourself a bottle, enjoy!

    Log in to Reply
  76. Anonymous says:
    8 March 2009 at 11:11 pm

    Is it just me, or does this smell of amber, and only amber, all the way through? If there are other notes in it, they must be hiding from me.

    Log in to Reply
  77. Anonymous says:
    9 March 2009 at 1:16 pm

    It's ambery, but smells like more than that to me.

    Log in to Reply
  78. Anonymous says:
    9 March 2009 at 4:29 pm

    How strange. I guess it's one perfume that doesn't like me.

    Log in to Reply
  79. Beffiee says:
    12 June 2009 at 4:46 pm

    Does anyone know the target market age range of this perfume ?

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      12 June 2009 at 6:25 pm

      No, sorry.

      Log in to Reply
  80. sharviss says:
    30 July 2009 at 1:17 am

    I just tried this today and I like it. Not sure I like it enough to spend money on but I have lots of Shoppers Drug Mart points so I think I’ll get this and Cartier Roadster with them.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      30 July 2009 at 7:22 pm

      Sounds like a good deal!

      Log in to Reply
  81. CedriCeCCentriC says:
    30 July 2009 at 11:34 am

    We are now less than a year after the launch of SO and I see in the sales bin of every perfume store I go to. Is it being discountinued? If that’s the case, the recession hasn’t made big companies like Coty (they own CK fragrances) very patient.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      30 July 2009 at 7:21 pm

      No idea if it’s being discontinued, but no — the perfume companies do not seem to have slowed down even slightly under the recession.

      Log in to Reply
  82. Ambrosia says:
    8 April 2011 at 2:51 pm

    Seeing as how the last post about this fragrance was July 2009, my favorite perfume store still carries this fragrance in abundance for any Secret Obsession lovers. Personally I enjoy this fragrance. It is one I have to be in the mood for though.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement


Luckyscent

Search

Browse by…

Topic

Perfume talk New fragrances
Shopping Books :: News
Body products Home fragrance
Polls Another subject

Date

December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
Prior months

Author

Robin Jessica
Angela Kevin
Erin Guest Author

Tag

Celebrity perfumes
Cheap thrills
Collector bottles
Perfumista tip series
Video
The complete tag index

From NST at Twitter

  • Headline of the day: "Gwyneth Paltrow’s vagina-scented candle almost burns down home of woman who won it in a quiz" https://t.co/F6bvZtoSXl,
  • "Jo Loves adopts refillable technology for Fragrance Paintbrush" (cosmeticsbusiness) https://t.co/sn2tZ1cguT,
  • @robini71 And my favorite honeysuckle is also limited edition -- Goutal Le Chevrefeuille. They do bring it back eve… https://t.co/MFGwHJK0Ji,

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

TBA April ~ freebiemeet

Back to Top

Home
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy

Shop for Perfume Online
Perfume Shopping in New York
Perfume Shopping in London
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Links
Perfume Books
Fragrance Awards

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2021 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.