• About
  • Login to comment
    • Facebook
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Perfumers
  • Perfume Houses
  • Shop for perfume
  • Resources

Tommy Hilfiger Dreaming ~ perfume review

Posted by Robin on 3 March 2008 35 Comments

Tommy Hilfiger Dreaming fragrance

Dreaming is the latest fragrance from Tommy Hilfiger, and is meant to appeal to "the Tommy girl grown up"* (but not too grown up: the target market is 18-30). According to Tommy Hilfiger himself...

Tommy Girl is a declaration of independence and Tommy Girl 10, a journey on the open road. Dreaming, on the other hand, captures the sophistication of a woman. It's sensuous, seductive, yet playful and unexpected.**

Dreaming was developed by perfumer Stephen Nilsen, and features peach, tuberose, freesia, white hibiscus, white woods and orris. It smells pretty much like it sounds — this is a fruity floral, sweet and sparkling in the opening, peppery white floral-ish in the heart, cool musky woods with a velvet finish at the end. It is pale and clean throughout, and I would call it "romantic and feminine" more than "sensuous and seductive", making it a good fit with its name and with the white-sheets-and-innocence ad imagery featuring model Mona Johannesson.

Dreaming is perfectly nice, and if there is nothing unexpected about yet another pale fruity floral, well, there you are. One of the hardest things about blogging your way through 800 new fragrance releases a year is finding something new to say about fragrances that don't smell new, and here I'll just give up and quote myself:

So: a very wearable, perfectly pleasant scent, and a good match with its relatively tame moniker. It is nicer, to be sure, than much of what I've smelled on the fragrance counters this spring, so it seems almost churlish to point out that it is neither exciting nor innovative, but there it is. It doesn't exactly ooze personality.

That's from last year's review of Miss Boucheron, and now I feel doubly churlish because worn side by side, Miss Boucheron handily wins over Dreaming in the "personality" department, and I'd call it way sexier to boot. Miss Boucheron actually turned out to be much nicer than lots of the fragrances that came after it in 2007.

Dreaming by Tommy Hilfiger perfume bottle

The Dreaming bottle is fine but surprisingly basic. A little charm hangs off the neck of the Parfum and the largest Eau de Parfum (100 ml, shown); if you get one of the smaller sized Eaux de Parfum, you don't get the charm.

Tommy Hilfiger Dreaming can be found at Macys or Boscovs in the United States. It is available in 15 ml Parfum, 30, 50 and 100 ml Eau de Parfum, in a rollerball/lip gloss duo, a limited edition solid perfume pendant, and matching body lotion and body wash. The lasting power of the Eau de Parfum is fine; I did not try the Parfum.

You can learn more at the dedicated website, dreamingaboutyou, where they've also got an "automated dream interpreter", should you be in need of one. I tried entering the word perfume, but perfume is apparently not in the dream database, nor is chocolate. If you've been dreaming about rabbits, they "usually symbolize vulnerability".

* Via Women's Wear Daily, 12/11/2007.

** Via The Malay Mail, 1/15/2008.

Possibly of interest

Tommy Hilfiger Impact ~ new fragrance
Tommy Hilfiger Tommy Into The Surf & Tommy Girl Sun Kissed ~ new fragrances
Tommy Hilfiger Tommy Weekend Getaway & Tommy Girl Weekend Getaway ~ new fragrances

Filed Under: perfume talk
Tagged With: fruity floral, stephen nilsen, tommy hilfiger

Advertisement


35 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2008 at 12:55 pm

    Rob, I KNEW you'd come around to Miss B!! It IS a distinct cut above, for what it is. I'm 50 and it's a great fit stylistically: fresh but with real presence. Glad you gave it another chance.

    Log in to Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2008 at 1:14 pm

    Did see Dreaming at Marionnauds and tomorrow will give it a try.

    Miss Boucheron also, since it is mentioned.

    There are lots of days that I feel like twentyfive or thirty so why bother about the agegroup :-) ?

    Log in to Reply
  3. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2008 at 1:20 pm

    R, too funny — after snarling at an SA at Bloomies last week who was waving Miss B at me (too young and too fruity!) I did go back and re-try it, and you are right — ain't half bad. I love the bottle. I wouldn't pay retail, but …
    And I think the ads for Dreaming are the best part. I know, they're ripping off Marilyn, and I don't care — that girl is lovely. I like the one where she's holding the veil up.

    Log in to Reply
  4. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2008 at 1:31 pm

    You know, I liked it when I tried it, just thought it was no big deal. Sometimes you can't tell how distinctive something is until you've smelled a bunch of other junk, LOL — I'd say the same of Flowerbomb, which I found dull when I first tried it but which also turned out to be lots better than its “way sweet & fruity” competition — although I still think it's a major let down given that it's from Viktor & Rolf. Miss Boucheron's dry down, with the “sort of animalic” suede stuff, is just more interesting than your average.

    Dreaming has no such chance, it smells too much like too many other pale fruity floral things. I wore it next to J Lo's Deseo and even Deseo has more “oomph”, despite the fact that I hate Deseo's big fresh opening.

    Log in to Reply
  5. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2008 at 1:32 pm

    You're quite right, why bother about the target age — wear what you like.

    Log in to Reply
  6. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2008 at 1:41 pm

    I'm not *dying* to own Miss Boucheron, but I'd wear it if I had it, whereas Dreaming might go unnoticed in the back of the cabinet. Agree on the ads for Dreaming, they're really well done, and as for ripping off Marilyn, well, at least they did a better job of it than say, Christina Aguilera. But it seems TH put all the $$ into the advertising — that packaging is pretty darned dull.

    Log in to Reply
  7. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2008 at 1:43 pm

    I love this ad, I have to go smell this. The finish sounds wonderful.
    I have yet to buy a Tommy H. perfume. (and I am ashamed to say I have samples of some and have yet to try those.)
    I really think this ad is romantic and sexy. Lovely idea.

    Log in to Reply
  8. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2008 at 1:56 pm

    Hope you will love it then!

    Log in to Reply
  9. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2008 at 2:02 pm

    Robin, thanks for sniffing your way through all these perfumes. I can understand your frustration facing hundreds of new releases every year, knowing that most of them are unsurprising and boring.

    Personally I don't even like the ad of Dreaming. Why is everyone trying to copy Marilyn Monroe these days?

    But I will give Miss Boucheron a try. ;-)

    Log in to Reply
  10. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2008 at 2:13 pm

    LOL — ignore my “frustration”, please, there are way worse ways to pass the time than trying to come up with something new to say about perfume, no? I count myself lucky.

    I can't dislike that ad — she is too lovely!

    Log in to Reply
  11. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2008 at 2:24 pm

    But a little bit of pity and encouragement is never wrong, right? At least we do all want you to go on with your sniffing and reviewing. :-)

    Perhaps I don't like the ad because it makes me think of Lindsay Lohan imitating MM's “last sitting”?

    Log in to Reply
  12. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2008 at 2:32 pm

    You're kind, thanks!

    And wow, I had not seen those shots of Lohan. For anyone else who wants to, here is a link:

    http://tinyurl.com/yvkfox

    Those pictures strike me as sad. Whatever you want to call what Marilyn Monroe had, Lindsay Lohan hasn't got it. Maybe I'm alone in this, but I find her entirely unsexy despite the great bod.

    Log in to Reply
  13. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2008 at 2:46 pm

    You're not alone, I agree with you completely. Bert Stern and Lindsay haven't done themselves any favour with this remake.

    Log in to Reply
  14. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2008 at 4:33 pm

    The model looks alot like scarlett johansson…maybe that was on purpose.?

    Log in to Reply
  15. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2008 at 4:33 pm

    No she hasn't furthered her career with this shoot. And her body has none of the volutuousness of MM's, either.

    Back to Tommy Hilfiger – are they hurting, sales wise? Their clothes used to be front and center, now I find them rarely. I would think they have taken a beating from Abercrombie.

    Log in to Reply
  16. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2008 at 6:24 pm

    I've no idea if TH is hurting in terms of clothing sales, but given how they're positioning this one, was wondering if they're trying to “upgrade” the clothing as well.

    Log in to Reply
  17. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2008 at 6:24 pm

    So she does!

    Log in to Reply
  18. Anonymous says:
    4 March 2008 at 6:17 am

    I smelt this perfume recently but it didnt move anything in me! i felt it too pale like pretty fabric softner kind of smell and it failed to last as well. its also similar to something else i have smelt but cant think of what! lacks punch perfume should inspire comment no?

    Log in to Reply
  19. Anonymous says:
    4 March 2008 at 10:10 am

    It didn't really remind me of fabric softener so much as a shampoo or other body product. Agree, it should be more distinctive.

    Log in to Reply
  20. Anonymous says:
    9 March 2008 at 8:02 pm

    the advertismenet of the scent did not attract me at all, now i know hwy, i am not longer target group (beacoming 30 and reading your blog/writing own perfume reviews). sexiness ist not TH's business, the label ist far too sportive in my opinion. i bet i would lie it, and i bet i would immediately forget it :-)

    Log in to Reply
  21. Anonymous says:
    9 March 2008 at 8:10 pm

    excuse me fot the tpo, i mean i would LIKE it and forget it :-)

    Log in to Reply
  22. Anonymous says:
    9 March 2008 at 11:24 pm

    It is a sporty label, but wondering if this is a sign they're going to try to “sex” up their image. We'll see what they do next.

    Log in to Reply
  23. Anonymous says:
    2 April 2008 at 4:18 pm

    I bought Dreaming for my Dad's very good friend and I went to Macy's 6 days later and they had the set for the SAME PRICE! Thankfully, I hadn't given it to her yet :). I exchanged it :)

    Log in to Reply
  24. Anonymous says:
    2 April 2008 at 7:44 pm

    Good for you!

    Log in to Reply
  25. Anonymous says:
    6 April 2008 at 7:01 pm

    Strangely enough, I tried this fragrance and found that the velvet finish at the end that you describe smelled rather sweaty. Both my daughter and I tossed back the card on Macy's counter because we didn't like the end. I was disappointed but then I've never been into any of the Tommy fragrances. Anyone else have this experience?

    Log in to Reply
  26. Anonymous says:
    6 April 2008 at 7:39 pm

    Gosh, no, I found it very clean. Maybe somebody else will chime in, although this is an older article so don't know if anyone else is around :-)

    Log in to Reply
  27. Anonymous says:
    6 April 2008 at 7:56 pm

    I didn't get that feel at all either. I really liked it.

    Log in to Reply
  28. Anonymous says:
    31 May 2008 at 5:20 pm

    I have a sample of this that I was given last time I harrassed the sales assistant at my local perfume counter, but have yet to try it. It's in one of those stupid bubble samples. Ugh- I HATE those. Just seeing one is enough to make me angry. I had one for DK Delicious that I tried to save by keeping it upright, but either it spilled and I didn't notice or it evaporated! I suppose I'll crack it open today, because I do kind of adore that ad in spite of myself, but urgh…not being able to come back to a sample makes me seriously peeved.

    Log in to Reply
  29. Anonymous says:
    1 June 2008 at 3:42 am

    Okay, so I got a sample when I bought my last fragrance (along with one for Gold by DK, which I already sort of own [it's quite a story, actually], and something by Paris Hilton, I believe). I tried it and it wasn't impressive. It seemed flat.

    So just now I applied it again (to my leg; my wrists are currently otherwise occupied) and maybe it's the interaction with my other perfume, but I'm getting this weird buttered-popcorn jellybean accord. Which, when you put that on some huge, white flower, seems terribly odd.

    I whole-heartedly agree, though; Dreaming is quite basic. It's progression is so slight it seems rather dull. However, I do rather like the bottle and the campaign is quite lovely.

    I'm gonna try this once more after my shower tomorrow and see if I get this strange note again. If it didn't have such an artificial smell and having to rest upon this nauseating flower, I think I could like butter. Ever seen butter in a fragrance? That would be very interesting. =o

    Log in to Reply
  30. Anonymous says:
    1 June 2008 at 8:54 am

    Oh, I just HATE bubble samples too! I used one once, now I just toss them in the trash.

    Log in to Reply
  31. Anonymous says:
    1 June 2008 at 8:56 am

    I can think of buttery scents (sometimes tuberose smells buttery) but not butter! Don't think it would improve Dreaming for me :-)

    Log in to Reply
  32. Anonymous says:
    1 August 2008 at 1:56 pm

    for me, the situation you describe in the Dreaming review, is pretty much the case with all the Hilfiger stuff – clean, well done, but nothing special (apart from T Girl that has an interesting undertone but i have seen it pretty rarely). i do not think i would buy a Hilfiger perfume (or blouse), but might buy a body wash because the scents do manage to smell nicely clean

    Log in to Reply
  33. Anonymous says:
    1 August 2008 at 8:53 pm

    Yes, that's pretty much true. I kind of thought Dreaming was going to be a bit different, but I'd actually rather have Tommy Girl.

    Log in to Reply
  34. Anonymous says:
    3 September 2008 at 7:35 pm

    So I (finally) smelled this today… and I was surprised at how much I disliked it. Normally, I'm all for this whole fresh floral stuff that saturates the market today, but this was just bad. It has no personality and no depth, and it feels (I hate to say this) like very little thought or effort was put into creating this one.

    Log in to Reply
  35. Anonymous says:
    3 September 2008 at 8:43 pm

    Either very little thought, or they just wanted to be very sure that it had so little personality that it would qualify as a “one size fits all”. Sometimes that approach works, but I'd be very surprised if this was a big seller.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

Browse by…

Topic

Perfume talk New fragrances
Shopping Books :: News
Body products Home fragrance
Polls Another subject

Date

February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
Prior months

Author

Robin Jessica
Angela Kevin
Erin Guest Author

Tag

Celebrity perfumes
Cheap thrills
Collector bottles
Perfumista tip series
Video
The complete tag index

From NST at Twitter

  • I am a day late but you can still enter: "Kraft Singles is giving away grilled cheese-scented incense to celebrate… https://t.co/8T64EZUJmy, 17 hours ago
  • @Counselor_Gal44 I don't always, but I really like these bottles so I hope I like at least one of this set!,
  • "Estée Lauder to close Rodin Olio Lusso" (cosmeticsbusiness) https://t.co/sXJcxxYlHW,

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

24 April ~ swapmeet

Back to Top

Home
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy

Shop for Perfume Online
Perfume Shopping in New York
Perfume Shopping in London
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Links
Perfume Books
Fragrance Awards

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2021 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.