• About
  • Login to comment
    • Facebook
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Perfumers
  • Perfume Houses
  • Shop for perfume
  • Resources

Marc Jacobs Honey ~ fragrance review

Posted by Robin on 16 July 2013 43 Comments

marc-jacobs-honey-lineup

The Marc Jacobs vinyl-accented juggernaut continues with Honey, a sort-of flanker to 2012′s Marc Jacobs Dot, which of course followed Lola and Daisy and all of their flankers. More specifically, Honey "channels the eclectic appeal of Marc's Dot signature and adds her own golden touch".

If you've liked what they've done with the bunch so far, you'll probably like Honey too. Like the rest, it's basically a cheerful and wearable fragrance. To my mind, Daisy was the most cheerful and most wearable of them all, and while Honey isn't going to knock Daisy off her pedestal, it's arguably less threatening than Lola or Dot — not that either Lola or Dot was particularly threatening.

Honey starts a bit crisp, but it's sweet from the start, with lots of pear shampoo and with what they're calling, in a rare case of truth in advertising, "fruity punch" (other notes include mandarin, orange blossom, peach, honeysuckle, honey, vanilla and woods). The fruity punch is also presumably a clue to the target market, which is no doubt youthful, but Honey is not the sugar-laden fruity floral it could have been, and I found it perfectly tolerable even in the heat. The heart is the usual sheer florals, although the orange blossom is more easily identified than is common with floral notes in this sort of youth-oriented, mid-tier department store sort of fragrance, which frequently cannot be described with any more precision than fruity punch + floral bouquet. The base is mostly pale, but the honey note adds some warmth to the dry down without drowning it in sweetness. It is sweet, mind you, but I've seen worse, and a few sprays on skin, while rather loud at first, tone down to an endurable level in reasonably short order.

Verdict: All in all, another decent outing from Marc Jacobs, and I would say of it pretty much what I said of Dot, although if forced to choose, I might prefer the Honey:

Dot is neither sophisticated nor sexy, and it isn’t trying to be. Memorable, no; distinctive, no again. It’s just what it needs to be: cheerful and easy to wear. It isn’t quite as perfectly calibrated to “massively pleasant” as Daisy; I found it “likable enough” instead of “darned likable”. That may seem like a minor distinction, but I don’t think Dot is going to find as large an audience as Daisy, which appealed to a wide range of ages and tastes. Dot’s appeal strikes me as more narrow, but it should find legs with its youthful target market, and that may be exactly what was intended.

More to the point, of course, is the über cute packaging, which will either appeal to you or it won't — you know who you are.

If you have a favorite of the Marc Jacobs vinyl series, do tell!

Marc Jacobs Honey was developed by perfumer Annie Buzantian; it is available in 30, 50 and 100 ml Eau de Parfum and in matching body products.

Possibly of interest

Marc Jacobs Decadence ~ fragrance review
Marc Jacobs Mod Noir ~ fragrance review, and a quick poll question
Marc Jacobs Daisy Dream ~ perfume review & quick poll

Filed Under: perfume talk
Tagged With: annie buzantian, flanker, fruity floral, marc jacobs

Advertisement


43 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. mutzi says:
    16 July 2013 at 12:58 pm

    Thanks for the review, Robin. It sounds like my 11 year old great-niece will be getting a bottle of Honey to sit next to the bottle of Dot we gave her for Christmas. Dot isn’t great, but she loves it and it suits her. So will Honey and they are preferable to the Justice scents she was wearing.

    I’m not overly fond of any of the vinyl series myself, but if forced to choose would go with Daisy EDP.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      16 July 2013 at 1:21 pm

      I’d go with Daisy too. The little tiny bottles for Dot & Honey are adorable though.

      Log in to Reply
  2. Marjorie Rose says:
    16 July 2013 at 1:10 pm

    I find myself wondering if MJ is really going for the collectibles route rather than the fragrance route–all these kitschy bottles reminds me of the G bottles (which at least Guen Stefani didn’t even try to create new scents for each time). They don’t appeal to me, but I can see how someone might get drawn in and find themselves wanting a little line-up of them on their dresser.

    For honey, my go to is a DC DSH scent called “Lush Honey.” It is precisely what it sounds like–a pure, sweet, warm honey note, like licking a spoon dipped in rich wildflower honey. It’s very cozy to me, when I’m in the right mood!

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      16 July 2013 at 1:21 pm

      Definitely a similar “fatal attraction to cuteness” thing going on…I’m looking forward to seeing what they do next.

      MAC had a great honey scent too, shame it isn’t around now — sometimes they come back though.

      Log in to Reply
      • Lys says:
        16 July 2013 at 8:57 pm

        I liked that MAC, altho if I remember it pulled that “honey notes in perfume being chemically near to urine notes” trick late in the drydown.

        Log in to Reply
        • basia says:
          16 July 2013 at 9:27 pm

          I love that MAC Naked Honey. Have a back-up bottle and wish they would bring it back.

          Log in to Reply
          • Robin says:
            16 July 2013 at 9:30 pm

            You never know — they did just bring back Turquatic. It could happen!

  3. Dao says:
    16 July 2013 at 2:04 pm

    I always like how MJ is able to bring some surprise and smile with their cute bottles. Nothing pretentious but at least real novelty! I will definitely go and try this latest fragrance. Love the idea and honey fragrance is totally worth exploring. As for DOT I loved the idea and top notes, but dry down didn’t work for me, kind of cheap and a bit disappointing..Any suggestion on similar fresh/fruity/watermelon fragrance? thks!

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      16 July 2013 at 5:04 pm

      The packaging is definitely great fun — they know what they’re doing. Fresh/fruity/watermelon isn’t my own style so can’t think offhand of anything, but gosh, there must be many, right?

      Log in to Reply
    • jonr951 says:
      16 July 2013 at 8:23 pm

      Have you tried D&G L’Imperatrice for watermelon? I think it’s perfect and I adore it. : )

      Log in to Reply
  4. antonpan says:
    16 July 2013 at 3:45 pm

    Tried this one today too. Honey is a fresher, citrusy version of Dot. It opens with a sparkling citrusy note, then becoming melony (the same melony feel as in Dot) generic white floral. There is not even a hint at honey here. The fragrance is less opulent and less sweet (frankly speaking Honey is sour than sweet) than Dot which I like much more.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      16 July 2013 at 5:04 pm

      Thanks!

      Log in to Reply
  5. breathesgelatin says:
    16 July 2013 at 5:24 pm

    My daughter is going to want this. She’s obsessed with the Dot bottle and she probably likes bees even more than she likes ladybugs.

    God help me though, although Dot is certainly innocuous enough (in fact, I sort of like it, though not for myself) I can’t bring myself to buy department-store perfume for a four-year old.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      16 July 2013 at 5:27 pm

      That’s hard, and the rollerballs, while cheaper, miss a lot of the cute factor. Maybe you’ll get lucky and she’ll never see it…

      Log in to Reply
    • dewey eyed says:
      17 July 2013 at 10:46 am

      If it makes feel any better, I’m probably buying this for my 6 yr old because her name is Bea.

      Log in to Reply
  6. Anna Stromberg says:
    16 July 2013 at 5:44 pm

    I was disapointed in Dot, but I’ll definetly try Honey. The bottle is very cute, imo.
    My favorite of the vinyl ones is Oh Lola, I’m a sucker for raspberry notes, and Oh Lolas top note is all about tart raspberries. If a bottle was given to me, I’d wear it.
    I find Daisy boring, almost as dull as the Splashes.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      16 July 2013 at 6:18 pm

      Ack, I can’t even remember if I tried Oh, Lola. I did try Lola, and I should have tried Oh, Lola just because that’s a great name.

      “As dull as the splashes” is a SERIOUS cut down, LOL…

      Log in to Reply
      • jonr951 says:
        16 July 2013 at 8:27 pm

        Lol Robin! You reviewed Oh Lola! Haha! : )

        Log in to Reply
        • Robin says:
          16 July 2013 at 9:31 pm

          Holy cow…and just about exactly two years ago. I probably remembered it for all of 6 months…and I predict that’s about how long I will remember the smell of Marc Jacobs Honey, LOL.

          Log in to Reply
          • jonr951 says:
            17 July 2013 at 3:46 am

            LOL! : )

  7. Merlin says:
    16 July 2013 at 5:52 pm

    When I first saw a photo of the dot bottle I loved it! I think the right term would be fugly? When I saw it on the shelf though, it seemed more on the monstrous side! Monstrously kitch, without being a parody… No lemming for me:)

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      16 July 2013 at 6:19 pm

      Money saved.

      Log in to Reply
    • mutzi says:
      16 July 2013 at 8:56 pm

      I like the smallest size bottles, the others not so much.

      Log in to Reply
  8. Omega says:
    16 July 2013 at 5:55 pm

    I do confess to being a Daisy fan, have the Daisy in both the clear and black bottles. Dot was lame beans, imo, but willing to try that honey. Though the bottle somehow reminds me of a baby rattle with pearls. Better than a squished ladybug, I guess.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      16 July 2013 at 6:19 pm

      A baby rattle with pearls — perfect!

      Log in to Reply
  9. Omega says:
    16 July 2013 at 5:55 pm

    Oh and I do love the Daisy body lotion and shower gel!

    Log in to Reply
  10. jonr951 says:
    16 July 2013 at 8:28 pm

    I really don’t care for Dot. But I really want this Honey bottle! It has to be better than Dot! It just has to! Haha! : )

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      16 July 2013 at 9:32 pm

      I think it is, but marginally. And obviously you might not 🙂

      Log in to Reply
      • jonr951 says:
        17 July 2013 at 10:51 pm

        Yeah, marginally better than Dot pretty much sums Honey up. I won’t be needing a bottle. Well, definitely not for the juice. Haha! Oh well. On to the next one MJ. : )

        Log in to Reply
        • Robin says:
          18 July 2013 at 10:51 am

          And there WILL be another one, I’m sure!

          Log in to Reply
  11. Lys says:
    16 July 2013 at 8:59 pm

    I wanted to like this one more, thanks to the build-up and that bottle, but it was kind of a yawner. I do like the idea of these bottles being aligned to the idea of a vinyl collection.

    (Forgive my sentence construction, it’s been a long day!)

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      16 July 2013 at 9:32 pm

      And with all the other brands joining in, you could do a darned decent vinyl collection!

      Log in to Reply
  12. eminere says:
    17 July 2013 at 8:02 am

    LOL vinyl collection

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      17 July 2013 at 10:46 am

      🙂

      Log in to Reply
  13. mals86 says:
    17 July 2013 at 10:22 am

    I really like Daisy. Still. For inoffensive-yet-pleasant it’s a winner. For what it’s worth, it doesn’t have a lot of fruit on my skin; it’s mostly white florals plus that soft woody-musk thing in the base.

    Dislike Dot very much (froot punch, anyone?) and despise Lola with the fire of a thousand blazing suns (froot punch caramel, anyone?), but this one sounds slightly nicer.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      17 July 2013 at 10:47 am

      Daisy is still the nicest, totally agree.

      Log in to Reply
  14. SmokeyToes says:
    17 July 2013 at 5:16 pm

    I’ve always loved the fun bottles, I tried a sample the other day but it didn’t last very long. I was hoping for a bit more of a honey note, but got way too many fruity notes instead. Oh well, $$ saved.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      17 July 2013 at 9:35 pm

      I am so surprised…even chlorine did not take it off my body. But if it was too fruity, doesn’t matter, right? And $ saved is always a good thing 🙂

      Log in to Reply
  15. Nile Goddess says:
    19 July 2013 at 9:53 am

    Dolce Vita packaging inspiration?

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      19 July 2013 at 11:16 am

      Could be.

      Log in to Reply
  16. PerfumeLady says:
    30 July 2013 at 8:38 am

    Been trying the summer edition of Daisy called Sunshine and it is great! It’s fun and easy to wear and the bottle is super cute! Got tons of compliments too. If this is anything like that then I’m looking forward to it too! You can’t go wrong with MJ!

    Log in to Reply
  17. beautifulotus says:
    27 October 2013 at 9:44 pm

    I miss Dolce Vita 🙁
    Is there anything even close to it?

    Log in to Reply
  18. joybells says:
    6 June 2014 at 12:03 pm

    So here I was in my fragrance store of choice, I tested Dot and Honey side by side. “Honey,” I thought, um, no! that’s not sweet, it’s sour! Too much tangerine, no no and no! So I bought Dot. And the next time I went back I bought Honey because I couldn’t get that orange blossom jasmine heart out of my nose. Honey is really a misnoma. I don’t think it smels remotely of honey. I do find that mandarin pear top note too crisp for my taste, sometimes it really can make my eyes water, but once it calms down I can’t get enough of the heart and base notes. The dry down lasts on me a long time, is sweet without being sickly and opulent without being loosh. I’m glad I bought the 50ml bottle, because I’ve a feeling the smaller one wouldn’t have lasted me too long! 🙂

    Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

Browse by...

Topic

Perfume talk New fragrances
Shopping Books :: News
Body products Home fragrance
Polls Another subject

Date

September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023

Prior months

Author

Robin Jessica
Angela Kevin
Erin Guest Author

Tag

Celebrity perfumes
Cheap thrills
Collector bottles
Perfumista tip series
Video
The complete tag index

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

 

Back to Top

Home
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Books

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2023 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.