• About
  • Login to comment
    • Facebook
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Perfumers
  • Perfume Houses
  • Shop for perfume
  • Resources

Vera Wang Lovestruck ~ perfume review

Posted by Robin on 30 August 2011 46 Comments

Vera Wang Lovestruck

So you've grown out of Princess (and its many spawn, from Flower Princess to Preppy Princess) but you're not ready for one of the signature (read: wedding-appropriate conservative floral) fragrances from Vera Wang, what to do? Vera Wang would like you to consider their new Lovestruck, fronted by actress Leighton Meester. The theme, as you might have deduced from the balcony scene in the ad: a modern twist on Romeo and Juliet.

Lovestruck is a musky floral with your standard fruit bomb opening (tart guava jam and citrus), a cheerful middle-weight fresh floral heart (allegedly tuberose and lotus blossom, and there are vague suggestions of both) and a pale woody-musky dry down (something that could stand in for sandalwood, a little drop of creamy vanilla, plenty of clean musk).

It's wearable, and it's not overly sweet or fruity once the top notes fade. It isn't as boring as the resolutely faceless Look, but it isn't exactly what I'd call distinctive either — landing, as it does, in a sea of same-y young-but-not-too-young pink floral fragrances with fruity accents. I suspect it will sell, or not, based on consumer reaction to the frou frou bottle with the faux nail polish font, which aims for, but in my humble opinion, doesn't quite reach, the same sort of tongue-in-cheek fun as Marc Jacobs Daisy or Lola. So far, it has reasonably good reviews at consumer sites like Sephora and MakeupAlley, if that sways you. I did not mind wearing it, but I'll have mostly forgotten it by this time next week.

Vera Wang Lovestruck

Vera Wang Lovestruck is available in 30, 50 and 100 ml ($48-78) Eau de Parfum. The lasting power is so-so. Lovestruck was developed by perfumer Stephen Nilsen; the notes include guava, angelica, tuberose, lotus blossom, woods and musk.

Possibly of interest

Vera Wang Embrace French Lavender & Tuberose ~ new fragrance
Vera Wang Princess Noir ~ new perfume
Vera Wang Princess of Hearts ~ new perfume

Filed Under: perfume talk
Tagged With: stephen nilsen, vera wang

Advertisement


46 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. breathesgelatin says:
    30 August 2011 at 1:40 pm

    I enjoy Vera Wang as a fashion house. I particularly love her more-affordable Kohl’s lines. It’s just weird to me that her fragrances, for the most part, are so youth-oriented when her brand is really not.

    Ah well. I have a sample of this from a nice Macy’s associate that I have yet to try.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      30 August 2011 at 2:13 pm

      Her original fragrances really weren’t youth-oriented at all, but given how well Princess has done, it’s not surprising that she wants to cover all parts of that market. Would not be surprised if Princess has outsold Vera Wang Signature (her first and best known before Princess) by a mile.

      Log in to Reply
    • faylene505 says:
      30 August 2011 at 4:05 pm

      I’m assuming the final phrase in that last sentence is a misplaced modifier. ;-) Yeah, I’ve been doing alot of editing work lately.

      Log in to Reply
      • Robin says:
        30 August 2011 at 5:32 pm

        LOL — yes, you have! No fair holding comments to that standard, esp. when we don’t have any sort of editing function :-)

        Log in to Reply
        • faylene505 says:
          30 August 2011 at 7:56 pm

          Only joking! I’m the queen of typos, myself. OTOH, I’m sure there’s someone interested in trying a nice Macy’s associate – especially if s/he smells lovestruck! :-)

          Log in to Reply
          • Robin says:
            30 August 2011 at 8:47 pm

            :-)

  2. JolieFleurs says:
    30 August 2011 at 2:26 pm

    I am a frou frou bottle fangirl from way back, and this one doesn’t thrill me at all. I suspect my dislike is rooted in the fake flowers, since I don’t like the Lola or Daisy bottles, either. Apparently, my bottle lust is triggered by dangling charms, rather than artificial flowers. (I will even admit to rather liking the tulle)

    I plead guilty to owning Princess, Flower Princess, and Rock Princess, based solely on the heart shaped bottles and the little rings that can be worn separately. (I am wearing the black Rock Princess ring on my thumb, even as I type.)

    And yes, I am 47 years old, why do you ask?

    Log in to Reply
    • LaMaroc says:
      30 August 2011 at 2:42 pm

      The cap on this really is laughable. I reserved judgement until I actually saw it in person and, yep, it’s worse. Wheras Marc Jacobs plastic/rubber flowers are cute and don’t even attempt to look real, these are cheap fake flowers, hollow fake flowers even. I really like Vera Wang’s style esthetic even if I don’t like her fragrances. But all of the bottles have been ok to me until this one. This is just atrocious.

      Log in to Reply
      • Robin says:
        30 August 2011 at 3:07 pm

        I have not yet seen it in person, but sure don’t love it in pictures. And some people didn’t like the font, but I kind of do — I think by itself, that would look kind of fun. It’s just buried in all that tulle.

        Log in to Reply
        • JolieFleurs says:
          30 August 2011 at 6:16 pm

          Yes, agree, the font on its own is rather cute, though surely younger than the demo we think they’re after?

          So they need to lose the flowers, keep the font, add a heart shaped top to tie in to the Princess line, and I still think it needs a charm, damn it.

          Log in to Reply
          • Robin says:
            30 August 2011 at 7:13 pm

            Gosh — if it has a heart shaped top and a charm, can that font really be too young?? (Like I’d know, LOL)

      • LaMaroc says:
        30 August 2011 at 8:01 pm

        I have been walking around all day knowing I mis-spelled/mis-used a word somewhere and now I remember: aesthetic not esthetic. Not like Vera Wang is a monk who deprives herself. lol Sorry. For the last week hardly anything looks spelled right.

        Log in to Reply
        • Robin says:
          30 August 2011 at 8:48 pm

          Hey, I do NOT throw stones! I know I make a mistake here nearly every day, and people only tell me about 5% of them.

          Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      30 August 2011 at 3:06 pm

      LOL — I did NOT ask! I love the Daisy bottle, and I love many of the Harajuku Lovers bottles. I refuse to admit that taste in flacons is indicative of age or maturity :-)

      Log in to Reply
      • JolieFleurs says:
        30 August 2011 at 6:17 pm

        Bless you, dear lady.

        Log in to Reply
        • faylene505 says:
          30 August 2011 at 7:58 pm

          Jolie, as one of the older readers of NST, I can assure you that age has absolutely nothing to do with maturity. :-)

          Log in to Reply
          • LaMaroc says:
            30 August 2011 at 8:05 pm

            Hear, hear. 39 going on 13.

  3. Rappleyea says:
    30 August 2011 at 3:22 pm

    Know what I thought of when I saw the picture? Not Romeo and Juliet, but Pretty Woman! :-)

    Log in to Reply
    • FragrantWitch says:
      30 August 2011 at 3:51 pm

      Me too! And I’d far rather Richard Gere be climbing up as well!

      Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      30 August 2011 at 5:32 pm

      Oh yeah, surprised I didn’t think of that!

      Log in to Reply
  4. Ari says:
    30 August 2011 at 4:28 pm

    Vera Wang is actually one of my least favorite mainstream perfume lines because she so clearly does not give a damn about the contents of that awful bottle. I hate that they think that all a perfume needs to succeed is “Vera Wang” on the bottle, and I hate that they’re probably right about that.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      30 August 2011 at 5:35 pm

      The original Vera Wang was well done if not spectacularly original, and a perfect fit with the bridal line. Don’t think they’ve ever done anything that good again. Look struck me as particularly cynical — it was so darned bland, right down to the advertising and the packaging, and IIRC, it was supposed to represent her couture business.

      And I really doubt Look sold, so they need more than the name!

      Log in to Reply
      • LaMaroc says:
        30 August 2011 at 8:07 pm

        Lol, Look was cynical, indeed. The name itself is tired, bored advertising: “Just Look will you. Look at it. Look! There. Now buy it.” :P

        Log in to Reply
        • Robin says:
          30 August 2011 at 8:48 pm

          LOL!

          Log in to Reply
  5. sheree.s says:
    30 August 2011 at 6:11 pm

    I loved Sheer Veil and Bouquet – the younger Princess ranges don’t make me screw up my nose in disgust, but I think they’re just a little simple. You know, BAM HERE’S THE FRAGRANCE NOW NOTHING ELSE WILL HAPPEN FOR THE NEXT SIX HOURS, whereas the others have layers and elements of interest that come and go as they dry down. I’m guessing this one will come somewhere in the middle. I’m not expecting to love it, but I don’t think I’ll completely hate it either (I wouldn’t buy it for myself, but if it was a gift I’m sure I could find opportunity to wear it). Either way, it won’t be available down here in Aust til February next year – have to keep reminding myself that patience is a virtue…

    Log in to Reply
    • JolieFleurs says:
      30 August 2011 at 6:22 pm

      Yes, and I liked the original and Truly Pink well enough for wallpaper/office type scents. They all go kind of musky on me after awhile, but then I just slap on something else.

      Log in to Reply
      • sheree.s says:
        31 August 2011 at 6:33 pm

        I don’t think I’ve ever tried Truly Pink – I just remember that the Sheer Veil in particular struck me as a perfect “wedding” fragrance (though, given my prior knowledge of Vera Wang was limited to flipping through the wedding dresses on her website and sighing, I probably had a bias going on there).

        Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      30 August 2011 at 7:14 pm

      That’s about right — in the middle, maybe skewed a bit towards Princess. Look, presumably, would be the missing link between this and the Signature line, but I bet Look is a goner.

      Log in to Reply
      • sheree.s says:
        31 August 2011 at 6:32 pm

        I know the company I work for has discontinued Look – I didn’t mind it at first, but got really bored of it after a couple of wears.
        I have a friend that is absolutely hanging for Lovestruck – she’s a massive fan of this Leighton girl (who I am woefully unfamiliar with – I hope I’ve spelt her name correctly!), so it’s a perfect example of how celebrity endorsement works.

        Log in to Reply
  6. Meg says:
    30 August 2011 at 10:30 pm

    Welcome back! Hope you had a great vaycay.

    This sounds perfectly ignorable. Will do. Although, I do worry now because I swear I remember a commentor saying they were going to off themselves if one more bottle with cheap flowers on the cap was released… and these sound cheaper than ever.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      31 August 2011 at 8:46 am

      Wonderful time away, thanks! Cut a bit short by Irene, but it could be worse.

      This bottle is not worth dying over, LOL…better to ignore it.

      Log in to Reply
  7. annemarie says:
    30 August 2011 at 10:51 pm

    Ah Robin, clearly you are back from your holiday refreshed and in top form. You turn daming with faint praise into an art. Great reveiw!

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      31 August 2011 at 10:58 am

      Aw shucks ;-)

      Log in to Reply
  8. hongkongmom says:
    30 August 2011 at 11:15 pm

    LOVE the colour of the dress. Got to smell this briefly whilst in Sephora in NYC. It got dismissed on first sniff as very nothing!

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      31 August 2011 at 10:58 am

      “Very nothing” is a good summary.

      Log in to Reply
      • hongkongmom says:
        1 September 2011 at 3:22 am

        Thanks :-)

        Log in to Reply
  9. thenoseknows says:
    31 August 2011 at 2:27 am

    WOW! i finally agree with the masses on here… did Jurgen Prochnow Snap that last seal!?!?!?! I smelled this just a few days ago and was not impressed at all… to vanillic and candied to with no backbone to it for it to be successful…. so another one in VW’s stable of Silly Willy-Nilly Fragrances ( i mean those AWFUL Princess Fragrances, EVERY ONE OF ‘EM! HATE THEM ALL!)

    of Look… Well… it didn’t set the world ablaze, but in my nose’s humble opinion… it was much more interesting than this little bonbon… I liked Look… I admit i liked it quite a bit… not that it was revolutionary, but it had a certain sophistication that i enjoyed… just it came out at the wrong time… it was the time of the beginning of the Candied/Fruity/Sticky/Goopy Over Caramelized Under Floralized fragrances that are now LEGION! (DAMN YOU ORIGINAL MISS DIOR CHERIE! LMAO!) if you really want a Vera Wang MASTERPIECE, seek out Bouquet… that is love in a bottle i tell ya! SO WELL DONE, So Feminine and Pretty and Romantic…

    alrighty then… The Nose has Spoken! :-D

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      31 August 2011 at 11:01 am

      Look wasn’t terrible. It was like that first L scent from Gwen Stefani — just too clean & fresh to be memorable.

      Log in to Reply
  10. lupo says:
    31 August 2011 at 3:58 am

    Well… Vera Wang for Men wasn’t that bad. Funny she didn’t attempt to produce anything else for the male audience. It would be completely hilarious. Can you imagine the line Prince? Cute Prince? Hunky Prince? Just the idea make me crack!

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      31 August 2011 at 11:01 am

      Oh, that would be funny!!

      Log in to Reply
  11. Nile Goddess says:
    1 September 2011 at 8:53 am

    Everyone has a word that damns with faint praise and for fragrance it’s got to be “wearable” :-D

    Bottle looks repulsive, and since I did not like any of her fragrances, even those in better looking bottles, I won’t be going out of my way to try this one.

    Since new releases look more and more like last year’s releases, maybe all mainstream houses would merge and they will produce one fragrance in one flacon, called EAU D’EAU, and consumers can pick the color and accessories – cap with flower, lace, silk, flacon glove etc.

    Something like a McFragrance :-D

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      1 September 2011 at 2:29 pm

      Ha!

      Log in to Reply
  12. Jonette says:
    1 September 2011 at 2:13 pm

    So many times here, I’ve seen perfumes that are referred to as “bridal fragrances”. What would be the definition of a “bridal fragrance”?

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      1 September 2011 at 2:25 pm

      A conservative, somewhat old fashioned, romantic floral -> Estee Lauder Beautiful, the first Vera Wang. By definition, these kinds of fragrances (to me, mind you!) go with pearls better than they go with jeans. They have some sillage, plus they last most of the day. They have some richness & depth, but they’re not overly animalic or sexy.

      Log in to Reply
  13. londongirl says:
    10 September 2011 at 4:01 pm

    its is lovely- for five minutes, until it disappears from view with a tiny goodbye wave. a real rip-off. what a shame.

    Log in to Reply
  14. Nicole says:
    13 November 2011 at 10:35 pm

    Did anyone else who smelled this get a weird nail polish note at the very beginning? I sniffed it on a tester card and it just smelled so harshly chemical to me.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

From NST at Twitter

  • "The best gourmand scents for a sophisticated sugar high" (harpers bazaar) https://t.co/SAgN9Cf7tc, 7 hours ago
  • Updated info on Carolina Herrera Good Girl Blush https://t.co/OY8AXDcdIa https://t.co/qvlUuLHFtm, 21 hours ago
  • "LVMH and L’Oréal Enter Bidding War for Stake in Aesop" (happi) https://t.co/z1IBHIooH8,
  • "House of Creed partners with Robbi to capitalise on China’s collectible toy craze" (campaignasia)… https://t.co/AtFJUHQSor,
  • @NamiWallace Good luck!,

Browse by...

Topic

Perfume talk New fragrances
Shopping Books :: News
Body products Home fragrance
Polls Another subject

Date

December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022

Prior months

Author

Robin Jessica
Angela Kevin
Erin Guest Author

Tag

Celebrity perfumes
Cheap thrills
Collector bottles
Perfumista tip series
Video
The complete tag index

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

4 January ~ damage poll
4 February ~ winter reading poll

TBA April ~ swap meet

Back to Top

Home
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy

Shop for Perfume Online
Perfume Shopping in New York
Perfume Shopping in London
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Links
Perfume Books
Fragrance Awards

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2023 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.