• About
  • Login to comment
    • Facebook
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Perfumers
  • Perfume Houses
  • Shop for perfume
  • Resources

Van Cleef & Arpels Oriens ~ perfume review

Posted by Jessica on 13 February 2010 85 Comments

Van Cleef & Arpels Oriens fragranceVan Cleef & Arpels tourmaline ring

First things first: the name is misleading. Van Cleef & Arpels Oriens is not an oriental fragrance. This Eau de Parfum is reportedly intended to evoke “the ever-changing mystery and magic of the exotic silk route to Asia,” and it's being billed as a “fruity floral chypre.” Created by perfumer Bernard Ellena, it features top notes of raspberry, black currant, and praline; middle notes of jasmine and fresh-cut white flowers; and a base of patchouli.

The bottle’s designer, Joël Desgrippes, modeled Oriens’ flacon after a ring design from Van Cleef & Arpels' fine jewelry collection: an enormous tourmaline set in white gold, like a flower surrounded by diamond-studded leaves. (The perfume bottle mimics the gem's pink-orange-green spectrum, but wisely dispenses with the diamond detailing on the prongs). The press materials for Oriens note that there is “an oriental theme seen in many of the house’s rings,” but again, this information is somewhat confusing; this particular ring, rather than having an “oriental theme,” was created for the “Midsummer Night’s Dream” collection of 2003, which also offered the inspiration for the Féerie perfume bottle (2008).

Van Cleef's original tourmaline ring is titled “Arbre aux Songes” (“Tree of Dreams”) which, come to think of it, would make a pretty nice name for this fragrance. Behind its flashy exterior, Oriens is surprisingly sweet and well-mannered. In its opening phase, a candied orange note is most noticeable. The white florals of the fragrance’s heart, despite their jasmine-centered claim, are airy and not at all animalic. The base, which gradually emerges and hovers beneath the long-lasting fruit notes, is a soft, dry cocoa with just a whisper of spice. If you’re not a patchouli fan, don’t worry; the patchouli is discreet and mild. (As Kevin recently noted, this is often the case in recent releases that advertise patchouli as a note). Nor, despite the Oriens press release’s description of this scent as a “fruity floral chypre,” does it register as a chypre. “Semi-gourmand fruity floral” would be a more accurate tag.

While I was testing Oriens over a period of several days, I kept having the feeling that this fragrance reminded me of something else. I finally figured out what it was: Oriens seems like an older, more sophisticated cousin to Juicy Couture's Viva La Juicy (whose listed notes are wild berries, mandarin, honeysuckle, gardenia, jasmine, amber, caramel, vanilla, sandalwood, and praline). Oriens has a softer "voice" than La Juicy, and she probably owns more cocktail dresses than velour sweatpants. Her hair's highlights are expensively subtle, and while she does love to wear jewelry, it's more likely to be one "statement" piece (such as a tourmaline ring!) rather than a jingling assortment of charms. In short, Oriens may suit someone who is almost tempted by Viva La Juicy but would prefer something less flamboyant.

In addition, Oriens could attract wearers of other fruit-flower-patchouli fragrances who are looking for something new to add to their scent wardrobe: it’s less sugared than Estee Lauder Pleasures Delight, brighter and fruitier than Ralph Lauren Notorious (another victim of the "wrong name" syndrome), and less musky than Tocca Cleopatra. If you’re really looking for something that evokes a traditional “eastern” fantasy, you might want to turn back to a classic like Yves Saint Laurent Opium or Guerlain Shalimar, or a more recent creation such as Miriam Mirani Aqaba, L’Artisan Parfumeur Safran Troublant, Chanel Coromandel, or yes, Montale Sweet Oriental Dream. If, on the other hand, you’re in the market for a new spring fragrance, and you think you’d like a vibrant fruity-floral with a subdued undercurrent of sugar-and-spice, Oriens might just take you on the right journey.

Van Cleef & Arpels Oriens is available in 30, 50 ($110) and 100 ($150) ml Eau de Parfum; a matching body lotion sells for $55. Oriens is currently exclusive to Bergdorf Goodman and Neiman Marcus.

Possibly of interest

Van Cleef & Arpels Santal Blanc ~ new fragrance
Van Cleef & Arpels Reve d’Ylang ~ new fragrance
Van Cleef & Arpels Rose Rouge ~ new fragrance

Filed Under: perfume talk
Tagged With: bernard ellena, van cleef arpels

Advertisement


85 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. Rappleyea says:
    13 February 2010 at 1:01 pm

    Thanks for writing a great review Jessica. I’m a big tourmaline fan, but personally, I’d prefer the ring without the added diamond bling. But that’s just me. No comment of the newest entry into the fruitchouli category.

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      13 February 2010 at 1:05 pm

      Rappleyea, That ring must be massive (and very sparkly) in person! and I think we should start using “fruitchouli” as a search tag. ;)

      Log in to Reply
    • RusticDove says:
      13 February 2010 at 1:43 pm

      I’m a fan of tourmaline also Rapple – and I agree, that ring would be better to just feature that huge watermelon tourmaline stone and leave off the detracting diamond studded ‘leaves’.

      Log in to Reply
      • Daisy says:
        13 February 2010 at 4:56 pm

        Tourmalines are my favorite stones! I knew you all were special…and very classy too! Although that ring is just too big….nice to look at , can’t imagine wearing it!!

        Log in to Reply
        • miss kitty v. says:
          13 February 2010 at 5:49 pm

          Tacky Person here. I love the ring, diamond-studded leaves and all. If only I didn’t have weird little Munchkin hands.

          Log in to Reply
          • Jessica says:
            13 February 2010 at 5:57 pm

            ha! Same here, hands-wise.

          • Rappleyea says:
            14 February 2010 at 12:59 pm

            Miss Kitty – I have small hands too, but that doesn’t stop me from wearing big stones! My all time favorite ring is an 11 carat iolite. It’s huge, but I love it. You go for it.

        • Haunani says:
          13 February 2010 at 7:37 pm

          I love tourmalines, too, but that stone looks too big for a ring!

          Log in to Reply
          • Jessica says:
            13 February 2010 at 8:02 pm

            I don’t own any tourmalines, but I wouldn’t say “no” to a small one!!

          • Daisy says:
            13 February 2010 at 8:47 pm

            Jessica—they come in a wide variety of colors and they are very hard so they make perfect stones for rings! oh great, now I want tourmalines…..

          • RusticDove says:
            13 February 2010 at 10:47 pm

            Oh – no such thing as a ‘too big’ gemstone! HA I LOVE big ‘cocktail’ style rings – I wear them a lot. Don’t have a watermelon tourmaline yet though. :-(

          • Daisy says:
            13 February 2010 at 11:31 pm

            I love the pink ones—-just gorgeous!

          • nozknoz says:
            14 February 2010 at 12:15 pm

            Great thing about a VC&A review (and thank you, Jessica) is that it reminds us how relatively ECONOMICAL our perfume habits are! ;-)

          • Rappleyea says:
            14 February 2010 at 1:02 pm

            Daisy – my *cough50thcough* birthday present to myself was a pretty big copper tourmaline stone, which I had set into a ring. Really different color! You need some for your business. I’d love to see what you do with them.

            Rustic Dove – I agree about stone size and my ring finger size is only a 5! BTW, congrats on winning the sample!

        • greenel says:
          14 February 2010 at 10:06 am

          After my second divorce I had my wedding rings melted down and presented myself with a teal green tourmaline from my home state of Maine, along with a vow to be true to myself! love to try this to see if my ACK response to fruitchouli is accurate.

          Log in to Reply
          • Jessica says:
            14 February 2010 at 10:33 am

            Greenel, I love that story!

          • Daisy says:
            14 February 2010 at 12:24 pm

            an excellent use of those rings! :-)

  2. RusticDove says:
    13 February 2010 at 1:48 pm

    “Fruitchouli” is definitely a contender for the perfumista lexicon! Didn’t someone here @ NST come up with that? Thanks for the review Jessica. Doesn’t sound like they came up with anything unique here. That bottle is SO gaudy that it makes me smile. ;-)

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      13 February 2010 at 2:29 pm

      Rusticdove, The bottle is wonderfully over-the-top!

      Log in to Reply
    • melisand61 says:
      13 February 2010 at 4:17 pm

      Look up Carmencanada’s review and the subsequent discussion of YSL Parisienne in Aug of ’09. You will see the origin of the term “fruitchouli” in one of the comments. Then you will see who started it in a moment of despair! :)

      Log in to Reply
      • Jessica says:
        13 February 2010 at 5:10 pm

        Aha! Thank you, Melisand61!

        Log in to Reply
  3. sarahbeth says:
    13 February 2010 at 1:57 pm

    Thanks Jessica. You read my mind because this was the fragrance I was very curious about. The bottle however creates some anxiety… how do you get the thing (top) OFF? VC&A seems to be stretching more with their bottles than with their juices, which does not impress.

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      13 February 2010 at 2:32 pm

      Hah… well, you just grab the “gem” and pull straight up! It pops off without any problem, but it’s pretty big! The bottle looks very sweet and simple without it.

      Log in to Reply
  4. sarahbeth says:
    13 February 2010 at 2:20 pm

    (I take that back. Collection Extraordinaire, in the spare bottles, includes some great ones.)

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      13 February 2010 at 2:30 pm

      Hi Sarahbeth, the Collection Extraordinaire is more to my taste, in both its design aesthetic and its scents (esp Lys Carmin and Orchidee Vanille), but Oriens probably has broader appeal!

      Log in to Reply
      • sarahbeth says:
        13 February 2010 at 3:22 pm

        Yes, and considering it is a bit less expensive too. For some reason, in aesthetic and pricing this reminds me of the release of B de Boucheron, with the green gem. Turin/Sanchez slammed that juice pretty hard (even though I got suckered in by the bottle). I wonder how Oriens will fare with those two. Does anyone know if they are going to come out with a second Guide anytime soon? There have been so many new perfume releases since their first, I feel the need for more guidance before making any purchases I will later regret.

        By the way Jessica, hello! I am new, but finally joined into the discussions after a couple of years of following this blog.

        Log in to Reply
        • Jessica says:
          13 February 2010 at 4:53 pm

          A belated welcome! As for Mr. Turin and Ms. Sanchez, their Guide was recently reissued in paperback, with additions… see here: http://www.perfumestheguide.com for more information. They also sent out a few electronic newsletters, by subscription, with additional reviews, but I’m not sure how/whether those are accessible now.

          Log in to Reply
          • kikilarue says:
            13 February 2010 at 7:50 pm

            I remember an e-mail from the site saying no more newsletters would be produced, and the redesigned site doesn’t include any links to them . I -think- all the reviews from the newsletters were included in the new paperback edition you mentioned (so… I bought it, that means two copies of the book in a small studio apartment…).

            Also, just want complain briefly about the uselessness, to me at least, of the “fruity floral chypre” descriptor. It reads like everything-but-the-kitchen-sink! :)

          • Jessica says:
            13 February 2010 at 8:02 pm

            Thank, Kikilarue! I think you’re correct, on both points!

  5. sunsetsong says:
    13 February 2010 at 4:12 pm

    I LOVE that bottle. Obviously would prefer the tourmaline ring given the choice……but would definitely have the bottle out on display and not in the dark cabinet of perfume treasures. The juice sounds eminently wearable.

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      13 February 2010 at 4:51 pm

      Sunsetsong, it’s definitely a bottle to display! and the fragrance is surprisingly easy to wear… I expected something much more dramatic, given the packaging!

      Log in to Reply
  6. annemarie says:
    13 February 2010 at 4:28 pm

    So, at those prices, Oriens is likely to appear in the department stores? I’m just trying to sort out where it fits in, cos I very curious to see the bottle (how does the cap lift off?). At my locals, all the VCA I every see is First, and some other thing – forgotten what (‘Second’?).

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      13 February 2010 at 4:50 pm

      Hi Annemarie, I’m not sure where it will go after its “exclusive” deal with Neiman/Bergdorf ends… Saks? Nordstrom? It’s definitely higher-end. The bottle *is* fun in person, and very heavy!

      Log in to Reply
  7. Daisy says:
    13 February 2010 at 5:10 pm

    I feel so cheated when something gets “chypre” tagged on it just because it has patchouli in it….and everybody has heard me ‘make verbal faces’ when raspberry shows up—-front of the line here–yikes!
    I’m afraid that the idea of a new “fruitchouli” doesn’t make me swoon (unless it’s swoon in a bad way due to the retchosity of raspberry) but I’m curious about that bottle… could be fun, could be outrageously tacky, but I do like a nice heavy bottle….
    The collection extraordinaire was a hit with me….I have at least some of 4 of them…and I really like the bottles: they are substantial, simple and classic.

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      13 February 2010 at 6:06 pm

      I agree about the “chypre” label… just when I had finally figured it out, it started to mean less and less!

      Log in to Reply
    • mals86 says:
      14 February 2010 at 2:59 pm

      “Retchosity”? Can I quote you?

      Log in to Reply
      • Rappleyea says:
        14 February 2010 at 6:14 pm

        I agree Mals. And I especially like the alliteration of “retchousity of raspberry”. Great touch Daisy!

        Log in to Reply
        • Daisy says:
          14 February 2010 at 8:35 pm

          yes, isn’t nice to know that I’ve made complaining into an art form??
          ;-)

          Log in to Reply
  8. CynthiaW says:
    13 February 2010 at 6:56 pm

    The bottle looks cute – but does it look that nice in person? Or is it cheap looking? Not that it matters, I already have Pleasure Delight and if I were looking for another fruitchouli, I’d probably pick up Notorious for $19.99 at Marshalls.

    On another note – guess what I bought today? Halle Pure Orchid – Walgreen’s had it for $6.99 for the .5 oz, so I had to nab it unsniffed. It’s okay – it doesn’t make me want to saw my arm off like Halle did, but it definitely smells inexpensive.

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      13 February 2010 at 8:03 pm

      Cynthia, The bottle looks big (even in the 50 ml size) and substantial, although the “gem” is, of course, plastic… but it’s pretty nicely done, and I’m sure it was expensive to produce!

      Log in to Reply
    • Daisy says:
      13 February 2010 at 8:53 pm

      Halle probably wouldn’t have been such a monster had you not applied it in 100 degree weather then got into your car that was as hot as the surface of the sun….it might be worth retesting now in less oppressive weather…..but still, just to be safe, I’ll let YOU do the retest while I sit safely at home….(my momma didn’t raise no fools…..you know, if you don’t count my little brother….)

      Log in to Reply
      • CynthiaW says:
        13 February 2010 at 10:38 pm

        lol – if they would have had a .5 oz of Halle for $6.99, I probably would have bought that, too. If I do test it again, it will definitely be in gold weather. The Pure Orchid is so sweet already, it does remind me of how overwhelming Halle was.

        Log in to Reply
        • Daisy says:
          13 February 2010 at 11:38 pm

          the purple-ness of it would suck me right in. There’s Walgreen’s only about 3 miles from here……
          But we have bigger perfume-fish to fry these days! You know, I really need to stop sniffing the spendy stuff. I find I love way too many of them. :-( I need a graphic of all my $$ flying out the window….

          Log in to Reply
          • Rappleyea says:
            14 February 2010 at 6:17 pm

            It’s not flying out your window – it’s smeared all over your skin! ;-)

          • Daisy says:
            14 February 2010 at 8:39 pm

            LOL too true, Rapple! Too true! :-D

          • ajuarez says:
            16 February 2010 at 4:06 pm

            not flying out the window… I bet you smell great!!

  9. eminere says:
    14 February 2010 at 3:26 am

    That bottle lid looks stunningly hideous. I can only imagine how much more tacky it would be in real life if it were made from plastic – the Versace bottles, anyone?

    I’m also surprised that “raspberry, black currant, and praline” don’t make for a more cloyingly sweet fragrance – would love to try this!

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      14 February 2010 at 10:34 am

      Eminere, It’s still on the sweet side for many NST posters, I’d bet, but nowhere as sweet as it sounds!

      Log in to Reply
  10. LauraK says:
    14 February 2010 at 8:42 am

    Hello, I want to start out by saying that I’m relatively new to this blog in that over the last few months I’ve read with great interest and excitement, many reviews and articles and have gained much insight in doing so. So from the get-go, I’d like to thank everyone for their knowledge and input.
    Years ago I was very ‘into’ perfume but decided to get rid of all of my perfumes when I discovered that there had been much research into the possible detrimental health effects that one could potentially experience from using perfume (or any product containing “fragrance” for that matter, since as far as I am aware perfume manufacturers are ’self-governed’ in that they do not have to specify exact ingredients in their labeling).
    Anyway, recently I became, once again, infatuated with fragrance – despite this previous knowledge lurking in the back of my mind – for it’s like any other indulgence, you know it could be bad for you, but it feels good so you do it anyway! Well, I thought it necessary to have another reality check. In doing so, I’ve unfortunately come to the realization that I must once again abstain from this enjoyment. There are too many damning claims against the safety of perfume/fragrance products. I would be very interested to hear the opinions of others on this site regarding this matter, and also your opinions on the smell and quality of naturally derived perfume products. Thank you :)

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      14 February 2010 at 10:57 am

      Hi Laura, I’m not an expert on health issues or the chemical aspects of fragrance, so I’m probably not the best person to answer this… and a site more focused on health topics, rather than a news-and-reviews blog like this one, might be more useful for discussing this concern… but I do own and enjoy some natural perfumes as well as my conventional ones!

      Log in to Reply
      • LauraK says:
        14 February 2010 at 6:54 pm

        Thanks for your response Jessica :)

        Log in to Reply
    • nozknoz says:
      14 February 2010 at 12:03 pm

      LauraK, apologies: when I logged on, my response, now somewhere below, was disconnected from your post. I also agree with Jessica that there are many good health sites. Personally, I check the New York Times online health section regularly. It has cogent summaries on major health topics (hypertension, osteoporosis, etc.) as well as news articles.

      Log in to Reply
    • mals86 says:
      14 February 2010 at 3:03 pm

      Laurak, you might want to check out this blog – the author focuses on organic/natural scents.
      http://www.scenthive.com/
      I wish you luck finding something to wear and enjoy!

      Log in to Reply
      • LauraK says:
        14 February 2010 at 6:55 pm

        Thanks so much MALS86 – I’m sure I will :)

        Log in to Reply
    • Winifrieda says:
      14 February 2010 at 7:01 pm

      Well LauraK I’m an ole tree-hugging greenie hippie and I would have to say that the amount of industrial chemicals that have permeated thru’ our environment make a little bit of fragrance, especially anything made with an emphasis on naturals, look like a drop in the ocean as far as contaminants go!
      Hopefully you are not having trouble eating or breathing or pumping petrol or using any cosmetics, dyes, plastics…anyway don’t get me wrong…but if you need to worry about something, have a look at what the agricultural conglomerates in cohorts with the chemgiants are doing to the human food chain!!

      Log in to Reply
      • LauraK says:
        14 February 2010 at 7:21 pm

        Hi Winifrieda,
        Thanks for post. Of course what you say is so true. All of the things you have mentioned continue to occupy my thoughts. Try as I might to be well-intentioned, I am no saint, that’s for sure but I try to make as many eco-friendly choices as I can (although not enough, I know). I wouldn’t say that the issue surrounding perfume is a drop in the ocean though. Seems to me that if you include all the products containing perfume on the market today, that’s something on a pretty frightening scale. I know there are much bigger issues out there (of course) but I feel it’s good to keep an open mind about these matters.
        I agree with nozknoz that it is perfume is an art worthy of appreciation, it’s just that I personally want to do so with a little caution.

        Log in to Reply
  11. nozknoz says:
    14 February 2010 at 11:49 am

    LauraK, for some reason, most of us are more worried about hidden risks than the big, obvious, proven ones – it’s just something about the way we are wired up. Nonetheless, statistically speaking, if you avoid tobacco smoke, fasten your seatbelt, and don’t talk or text on a cellphone when you drive, then you’ll be so far ahead of the game that you can stop worrying about ANY unforeseen risks! It also makes sense to eat real food, reduce salt and get some exercise. If ONLY doing penance by denying oneself perfume would compensate for our sedentary lives :-)

    Perfume is an art form worthy of appreciation. I’m not persuaded that perfume is at all risky – it seems as if the regulatory authorities are erring too far on the side of safety – but even if it were, why would we want to live a long life without beauty?

    Log in to Reply
    • Rappleyea says:
      14 February 2010 at 6:20 pm

      Well said, Nozknoz.

      Log in to Reply
      • LauraK says:
        14 February 2010 at 7:02 pm

        Yes, well said…but if I didn’t worry about everything what would I have left to do? lol.

        Still, I really do believe the risks are high, it just seems like common sense to me. But I love being taken on a journey with fragrance so I am very keen to try out some natural ones and will start by checking out the website MALS86 suggested.

        Thanks for feedback everyone :)

        Log in to Reply
        • Daisy says:
          14 February 2010 at 8:55 pm

          Unfortunately for all of us there is number of dangerous contaminants in our air, water and topsoil that there is simply no escaping….so you do what you can, right? I’m an avid label reader myself—just a trip to the local grocery store frightens me!! But when it comes to “all natural” ingredients as opposed to synthetics in body products —I would very seriously recommend having a talk with a dermatologist. A few years ago my daughter and I were both having a LOT of skin irritation, it got so bad that I was worried we had picked up some fungal condition or something–found a highly recommended dermatologist who took one long look at our itchy patches and scalp etc. and then she said: you use a lot of “all natural botanical” type products? to which I said “yes!” , she handed me several photocopied sheets of paper with lists of products that were safer to use. Told me that the single most frequent set skin problems she saw was irritation and allergies caused by “botanical” ingredients which we are led to believe that they are better for us because they are “all natural” . Keep in mind that most botanical ingredients in body products are untested and unregulated. Just a word of caution.

          Log in to Reply
          • Daisy says:
            14 February 2010 at 8:57 pm

            and apparently I have no sense of grammar tonight….sorry.

          • LauraK says:
            14 February 2010 at 9:07 pm

            Thanks Daisy. Yes, the ‘all natural’ tag is one to be weary of. I think it’s great advice to do your research and consult professionals. There are a few brands I trust but many others that I’ve also had issues with. It’s a tricky one.

        • nozknoz says:
          15 February 2010 at 11:09 pm

          Well, I admit that I DO opt for the unscented versions of many products, such as unscented laundry detergent and deodorant, in the spirit of saving calories (chemicals) for dessert (perfume). :-)

          Log in to Reply
          • LauraK says:
            17 February 2010 at 8:15 am

            Wondering if anyone has read this blog and has had the curiosity to question the safety and ethical nature of perfume manufacturing over the last few days?

  12. prism says:
    14 February 2010 at 2:06 pm

    oh wow

    that lid is effing gorgeous

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      14 February 2010 at 2:30 pm

      Prism, it’s striking, isn’t it?!

      Log in to Reply
      • prism says:
        15 February 2010 at 6:10 am

        i saw photos of the lid and it looks rather… disappointing. it’s beautiful in this shot cause the glass looks multi colored, but in other shots it’s only pink.

        :/

        Log in to Reply
        • Jessica says:
          15 February 2010 at 10:48 am

          Hi Prism, I’ve seen those other shots, and I’ve seen the bottle in person, and the photo we used is more accurate… the “stone” has three colors (pink, purple/fushchia, green).

          Log in to Reply
  13. jbsundries says:
    14 February 2010 at 2:15 pm

    Love that bottle!

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      14 February 2010 at 2:31 pm

      Jbsundries, It’s really eye-catching, and not likely to be confused with any other perfume bottle on one’s dresser!!

      Log in to Reply
  14. jbsundries says:
    14 February 2010 at 4:06 pm

    I’d buy it for the bottle alone if I had the $$$ to spare!

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      15 February 2010 at 10:47 am

      JB, I bet you’re not the only one who feels that way! They obviously put a lot of thought into making the bottle look so appealing!

      Log in to Reply
  15. hongkongmom says:
    15 February 2010 at 3:48 am

    I lOVE the bottle….and the juice sound bearable and easy to wear, unless the juice is awful and the lid too “plasticky” in real life..I will have to have one..look at the colours in the lid and the balance of shapes…and I love the ring too..not for me, but to admire as a piece!!!

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      15 February 2010 at 10:47 am

      Hongkongmom, It’s probably a matter of taste, but do take a look if you have a chance to see it in person!

      Log in to Reply
  16. LauraK says:
    16 February 2010 at 6:50 am

    I’ve found what I think is perfume heaven…it’s called “Velvet and Sweet Pea’s Purrfumery” and the lady who creates these botanical perfumes is Laurie Stern. I’m yet to try her products but am so thrilled by her ethically and morally awesome philosophy to perfume making.
    I wonder, has anyone ever tried any of her perfumes? I am about to order samples of them all and can’t wait to try them :)

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      16 February 2010 at 10:45 am

      Hi Laura, I haven’t tried this line yet, but I think Trish at the Scent Hive blog has written about it (www.scenthive.com). You might also want to register at http://www.Makeupalley.com, if you haven’t already, because their “Green Board” discusses natural fragrance on a regular basis. Good luck!

      Log in to Reply
  17. LauraK says:
    17 February 2010 at 8:22 am

    Oops, meant for my comment to be here…
    Wondering if anyone has read this blog and has had the curiosity to question the safety and ethical nature of perfume manufacturing over the last few days?

    Log in to Reply
  18. Chrissy48 says:
    24 March 2010 at 8:31 am

    I bought this perfume, on sight (unsmelled), because I loved the look of the bottle and because of the review.
    I personally think it smells like a VERY rich, older women’s perfume. (Of which I am neither).
    Not a huge fan of it. (Oh well, I love the bottle and it will look pretty on my dresser.)

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      24 March 2010 at 8:50 pm

      Chrissy, I’m sorry you bought unsniffed! I’d never recommend that! In any case, that’s an interesting reaction. I found it to be the “youngest” of the VC&A scents so far, except Feerie. I’d guess they’re aiming Oriens at 30-somethings. It’s certainly “younger” and brighter/sweeter than any of the classic Chanel or Guerlain scents, or something like Hermes’ Faubourg 24, which would be my picks for more “adult” or “affluent” scents. Then again, these categories are all very subjective.

      Log in to Reply
  19. scentsappeal says:
    5 April 2010 at 11:02 am

    I dared to purchase this unsniffed and managed to snag the 100ml bottle that retails for $150 for $92 on eBay…no regrets here as it totally works on me, I love it and the bottle is a beauty – and quite hefty. Just like you Jessica, it jogs my memory of something I have smelled before, but for the life of me can’t conjure up what it is. Today I have it layered with EL’s Jasmine White Moss. Lovely combination for a beautiful spring day.

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      8 April 2010 at 12:30 pm

      Scentsappeal, I’m glad it worked for you! and glad you got a bargain!

      Log in to Reply
  20. Owen says:
    15 June 2010 at 12:24 pm

    I was in Debenhams today and my Mum said ooh thats a pretty bottle,
    and I was like yeah the price will be too. it’s the same pricing as Chanel.

    the bottle itself is quite light, the tester didn’t have a top and it’s the top that’s heavy. I picked a box up to look at the price and nearly dropped it , it’s heavier than I thought.

    it’s very nice though, I wanted to spray it on Mum but she wouldn’t so I’ve only smelled it from the bottle. very fruity.

    hmm, I didn’t make the link to oriental from oriens and I didn’t make the link to Viva La Juicy and I tried that on my arm, though it does smell of orange or orange blossom to me.

    if you ever decide to get this fragrance, KEEP THE BOTTLE, it’s amazing, though I don’t think it looks anything like a flower. it’s cheaper than Féerie anyway, and maybe nicer.

    Log in to Reply
  21. kaos.geo says:
    19 August 2010 at 7:42 pm

    Hello Jessica, I just tried this here in buenos aires.
    It has been available for a couple of months already but i didnt have the chance.
    Your review is spot on!
    I might add that it reminds me, when it starts to morh from top notes to mid notes, of Miss Dior Cherie :-)

    Log in to Reply
  22. Rainbowman18 says:
    16 December 2012 at 7:07 am

    Just purchased this scent last night for my wife’s 60th birthday. Never actually put it up to my schnoz, but by the aromas that are contained within that beautiful bottle and tourmaline top, and the blog entries it garnered, I figured that it would be a sweet surprise for us both, upon uncorking. I introduced my wife to Guerlain’s Insolence a few years ago and she still cherishes it as her favorite. I figured that Van Cleef and Arpels has a great name and designs some fine jewelry, etc., so I really couldn’t go wrong.
    I know I’m late to this blog party, because the perfume was introduced a while ago, but I will have an update when the complex aroma fills our house.

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      16 December 2012 at 4:25 pm

      I hope she’ll enjoy it!! What a thoughtful birthday gift.

      Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement


Parfum1

Luckyscent

Search

Browse by…

Topic

Perfume talk New fragrances
Shopping Books :: News
Body products Home fragrance
Polls Another subject

Date

November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
Prior months

Author

Robin Jessica
Angela Kevin
Erin Guest Author

Tag

Celebrity perfumes
Cheap thrills
Collector bottles
Perfumista tip series
Video
The complete tag index

From NST at Twitter

  • "L'Oréal succeeds Puig as Prada fragrance licence holder" (cosmetics business) https://t.co/nbywEZunAp,
  • "Let It Snow! Chanel Takes Over the Standard Hotel With a Winter Wonderland and Performance by Monsta X" (vogue) https://t.co/4EjFIhWMO8,
  • RT @DemeterCEO: On Day 2 of #Christmas enjoy 40% OFF All EGG NOG Products including Bath & Shower Gels. Wear this and you won’t ne… https://t.co/ywaTHMi5vI,

Recent reviews

Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman
L’Artisan Bana Banana
Byredo Sundazed
Hermès Un Jardin sur la Lagune
Diptyque Eau de Minthé
Maison Margiela Mutiny
Anna Sui Fantasia Mermaid
Etat Libre d’Orange I Am Trash

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

***

TBA January ~ freebiemeet
TBA March ~ swapmeet

Back to Top

Home
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy

Shop for Perfume Online
Perfume Shopping in New York
Perfume Shopping in London
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Links
Perfume Books
Fragrance Awards

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2019 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.