• About
  • Login to comment
    • Bluesky
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Archives

Bath & Body Works Twilight Woods ~ perfume review

Posted by Jessica on 31 October 2009 43 Comments

Caspar David Friedrich Man and Woman Contemplating the Moon

When I heard that Bath & Body Works would be releasing a fragrance called “Twilight Woods,” and that this fragrance would evoke “a romantic walk in enchanted woods,” I imagined a blend of pine and cedar, a few drops of resin, and an ozonic note hinting at an oncoming snowstorm. When I later saw the list of notes, I realized that it would actually be a woodsy-fruity gourmand, with “top notes of Juicy Berry, Sparkling Mandarin, and hint of Coconut, heart notes of Creamy Frangipani, Soft Mimosa, Wet Honeysuckle, Wild Freesia, and Apricot Nectar, and basenotes of Oud Wood, Skin Musk Captive, Vanilla Milk, and Warm Woods.”

Twilight Woods is the newest addition to Bath & Body Works’ Signature Collection line, in keeping with the recent string of more complex, “abstract” fragrances (such as P.S. I Love You, as opposed to yet another Cucumber Melon type). It was developed by perfumers Harry Fremont, Jane Konnyu, and Honorine Blanc.  This fragrance could just as easily have been named "Twilight Orchard," because a ripe apricot note runs throughout its development, starting off in a bright, syrupy vein and then gradually turning more subdued, like candied fruit. A creamy heart of frangipani petals and soft musk surrounds the apricot note after a short while, and a light, milky vanilla-coconut accord appears later in the dry down. Overall, this is a sweet scent (although nowhere near as tooth-achingly saccharine as Warm Vanilla Sugar), but it feels smooth and well-rounded.  The lingering traces of the fragrance, when the warm, woody notes finally become more noticeable and mesh with the ripe fruit aspect, are surprisingly polished (and long-lasting) for an Eau de Toilette that costs less than $30.

Bath & Body Works Twilight Woods perfume

Overall, Twilight Woods fits neatly into the recent trend of smooth, accessible fruity-woods fragrances. Its apricot note reminds me of the recent B de Boucheron, which included orange blossom, osmanthus, apricot, and sandalwood. It doesn’t have the spiced-honey accord of Estee Lauder’s Sensuous, which also featured mandarin and “molten woods,” but it might appeal to similar tastes. If you're a fan of Calvin Klein Euphoria, and you can imagine it with apricot rather than pomegranate, you might also like Twilight Woods. However, if you were hoping for something more along the lines of Serge Lutens Fille en Aiguilles or Kiehl’s Forest Rain, Twilight Woods probably won’t appeal to you much. And as for the inclusion of oud, which is shaping up to be the “it” note of late 2009:  if (like me) you don’t care for oud, don’t worry, because it isn’t noticeable here. If you’re an oud-lover, on the other hand, stick with the Montale line, or wait for L’Artisan Parfumeur’s forthcoming oud fragrance.

Lastly, in addition to joining the “sensual woods” trend, Twilight Woods is timely in another way: although it has no connection to the mega-successful books and movies of the “Twilight” saga, its release happens to fall just before the opening of the second movie in the series. I have a feeling that this fragrance is going to be very popular in its own right, even without the teen vampires, and if you’re looking for an autumnal-feeling comfort scent, you may want to give it a try. If Twilight Woods doesn't literally smell like a moonlit forest, maybe it suggests all the accessories to an evening walk in the woods, instead: hot cider or a dish of warm fruit cobbler before you head outdoors, a soft wool sweater or a cashmere scarf to keep off the chill, maybe a glass of red wine and a glowing fire in the fireplace when you return home.

Bath & Body Works Twilight Woods Eau de Toilette sells for $29.50 for 75 ml; an 8.5 ml roll-on is $7.50. The Twilight Woods scent is also available in a range of accompanying body and home fragrance products.

Note: top image is Man and Woman Contemplating the Moon by Caspar David Friedrich via Wikimedia.

Possibly of interest

Commodity Book ~ fragrance review
Gucci Guilty Absolute Pour Homme ~ fragrance review
Loewe 001 Woman ~ fragrance review

Filed Under: perfume talk
Tagged With: bbw, cheap thrills, harry fremont, honorine blanc, jane konnyu, wood

Advertisement


43 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. RachelSF says:
    31 October 2009 at 1:04 pm

    the name and packing seem so completely misleading here – the notes read more like “midday jungle”. I was hoping for something dry and woody with a hint of vampire but this sounds too juicy fruity by far.

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      31 October 2009 at 2:04 pm

      Hi Rachel, Like I wrote, it wasn’t what I imagined either; definitely warm and sweetish rather than dry and mysterious. I liked it, once I realized it wasn’t what I expected!

      Log in to Reply
  2. marko says:
    31 October 2009 at 1:22 pm

    I ventured through the mall yesterday (note to self: unless you LOVE the sound of screaming toddlers, stay away from the mall the day before Halloween!!!) on a quest to smell Love, Etc @ Body Shoppe and stopped by B & B W to check out P.S. I Love You and Velvet Tuberose – and subsequently tested this too. You are much kinder then I would have been in your description….I didn’t care for this at all – I wanted it to be MUCH drier and woody – it was too sweet for my taste. (Didn’t care much for Love, Etc. either, but I did score a bottle of Guerlain Aqua Allegoria Pamplelune after a stroll through Sephora!!!!)

    Log in to Reply
    • boojum says:
      31 October 2009 at 1:37 pm

      I sniffed at the bottle and that was as far as I got (had other business to attend to…13 yr old needed costume). I will say, the bottle is very attractive (much more so in person than the pic above)…but I wasn’t at all compelled to test on paper, let alone skin. Oh well.

      Log in to Reply
      • Jessica says:
        31 October 2009 at 2:07 pm

        Boojum, I’m actually pretty smitten with the bottle, even though it doesn’t completely “match” the scent. I heard a 20-something woman in the store say, “If I were 16, I’d love this bottle.” Well, I left 16 behind a looong time ago, but I still love it. Kind of mall-Goth. 😉

        Log in to Reply
        • boojum says:
          31 October 2009 at 7:59 pm

          In that case, you might want to check out the “Luna Twilight” makeup line over at Nordie’s…. I nearly bought a lipgloss, even though I haven’t read a single book nor seen the movie (and don’t plan to do so), just bc of the gorgeous bare, black tree on it. 😀

          Log in to Reply
      • mals86 says:
        31 October 2009 at 7:22 pm

        I thought the same thing – pretty good for $30, but *I* don’t need it.

        Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      31 October 2009 at 2:06 pm

      Hi Marko, You were brave to face the mall this weekend! It’s definitely a sweet woody gourmand, although nowhere as sweet as some other B&BW scents!

      Log in to Reply
      • Aparatchick says:
        31 October 2009 at 3:45 pm

        I tried it today (and if you thought the day before Halloween was bad ….) and found it to be much less sweet than what they’ve produced before. Also not in the cucumber-laundry detergent theme I’ve seen there. A little too sweet for me to use as an EDT, but I could see using the body lotion.

        Log in to Reply
        • Jessica says:
          31 October 2009 at 4:40 pm

          Hi, Aparatchick… As someone who feels queasy in the presence of Warm Vanilla Sugar, and who has never owned a “cucumber-laundry detergent” fragrance (soap and a shower make me smell “clean”… perfume is something extra!), I’m enjoying this one. I also tested the shower gel, which is somewhat fruitier and reminded me a lot of CK Euphoria.

          Log in to Reply
  3. newsitian09@yahoo.com says:
    31 October 2009 at 1:58 pm

    Why do I get the feeling that the SCENT was well into development when the vampire thing hit big. Then the NAME got changed to take a free ride on all of that tie in advertising. All I smell here is a RAT. Denise

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      31 October 2009 at 2:10 pm

      Newsitian, I don’t know the exact timeline for B&BW scent/concept development, but I’m assuming it’s pretty long! (Also, that they wouldn’t cut things close enough to risk a lawsuit.) In any case, the Twilight book/movie fans seem to realize (based on some very informal searching I’ve done) that the fragrance is around, but that it’s not a tie-in product.

      Log in to Reply
  4. crowflower says:
    31 October 2009 at 4:10 pm

    I went into my perfume oil collection from the 80s and got out Dark Amber, Dragon Amber and straight oil of patchouli to layer a autumn leaves and fall scent for Halloween. That’s more my idea of Twilight Woods.

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      31 October 2009 at 4:40 pm

      Crowflower, Sounds good to me!

      Log in to Reply
    • _Sweet_Dreams says:
      10 January 2010 at 12:29 am

      hey, are those from black phoenix? I like black phoenix a ton

      Log in to Reply
  5. Na says:
    31 October 2009 at 4:14 pm

    Love the bottle and the Name!
    although I agree that it suggests something different from what it actually smells like.

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      31 October 2009 at 4:41 pm

      NA, They did a really nice job with the packaging. A bit misleading, but then again, *every* fragrance has to be tried in person, doesn’t it.

      Log in to Reply
  6. Dolly says:
    31 October 2009 at 4:25 pm

    Jessica- this sounds so disappointing. The name and notes don’t seem to match. Guess, there’s no sign of Serge in this.

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      31 October 2009 at 4:44 pm

      Well, “disappointing” is a matter of taste… like I said in the review, it’s definitely not Serge-like (and Monsieur Lutens really did start the “woods” vogue back in his Shiseido days, didn’t he?), but then again, most shoppers aren’t familiar with the SL aesthetic in the first place. I actually *like* sweet scents and certain fruit notes, and I don’t wear any Serges except Rahat Loukhoum, the sweetest one he makes. So not *everyone* will be let-down. 😉

      Log in to Reply
  7. crowflower says:
    31 October 2009 at 4:51 pm

    I can’t get past the anise note in Lolita Lempicka, but I have it anyway because of the bottle. I could see having this for the same reason even if I didn’t fall in love with the perfume.

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      31 October 2009 at 4:57 pm

      Crowflower, I used to wear Lolita Lempicka, too, and even when I eventually tired of it, I kept the bottle. One of my favorite designs! I have to stop myself from buying the LL flankers just for their packaging…

      Log in to Reply
      • alltheprettythings says:
        31 October 2009 at 5:30 pm

        I LL’s gwps! They come out with the most adorable little minis!

        Log in to Reply
  8. alltheprettythings says:
    31 October 2009 at 5:30 pm

    Sounds like it would make a good candle.

    Thanks for the review!

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      31 October 2009 at 5:33 pm

      Prettythings, I believe there *is* a candle, and a home fragrance oil. That’s one thing about B&BW: if there’s a fragrance you like, you can really surround yourself with it!

      Log in to Reply
    • catsofulthar says:
      7 December 2009 at 11:26 am

      I think it does work better as a candle….it was the only version of Twilight Woods that I considered buying when I first encountered it at the store.

      Log in to Reply
      • Jessica says:
        24 December 2009 at 9:49 am

        Hi Catsofulthar, I went back and bought a small candle during one of the sales; strangely enough, it seemed sweeter as a candle! I think I prefer the fragrance, in the end.

        Log in to Reply
  9. CynthiaW says:
    1 November 2009 at 6:22 pm

    I actually picked up the little $1 lotion bottle and the $7.50 roll-on before the scent was “officially” released and I really like it. Mind you, I *like* CK Euphoria and enjoy ambers and gourmands in the right circumstances, but I really think that it’s a nice little scent. It’s nothing ground-breaking or unique, but it’s well-done and comforting.

    I probably won’t drop $30 for a bottle, but I’ll pick one up when it hits the outlet for $4.99.

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      1 November 2009 at 6:27 pm

      Hi, Cynthia! We have some similar tastes. It’s nice that they offer a smaller size as a roll-on, too. I think it’s a more well-rounded scent than Midnight Pomegranate, for example… I *almost* wanted that one, but it felt a bit rough around the edges. That one wasn’t as “dark” as the name suggested, either, come to think of it!

      Log in to Reply
      • CynthiaW says:
        1 November 2009 at 6:36 pm

        I think that B&BW definition of “dark” is a bit different than ours – lol. I know what you mean about Midnight Pomegranate, although I did like it enough to plunk down $4.99 at the outlet for it. I mostly use it for a linen spray, after shower scent type thing. The B&BW outlet is about 5 minutes from my house – so if you ever like something enough to want it, but not enough to pay full price for it, let me know and I can keep an eye out for it.

        I wish that more of their scents came in the little roller-balls – I really like White Citrus, too, but I’m waiting for that one to hit the outlet to buy.

        Log in to Reply
  10. laken says:
    1 November 2009 at 9:33 pm

    given the notes it should be called “tropical beach resort”, or “midday at the beach”

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      1 November 2009 at 10:09 pm

      Laken, There isn’t really anything beachy about it, though! I’ll stand by my suggestion of “Twilight Orchard.” Or maybe “Sunset Orchard.” 😉

      Log in to Reply
  11. supa kawaii says:
    2 November 2009 at 6:04 pm

    It smells just like With Love… by Hilary Duff…
    I sprayed it and I swear I could recognize this scent from somewhere then I later brushed threw the Macys counter and saw With Love… and was like this is an imitation…
    Buy this for cheap thrills if u cant find H.D. fragrance…but its a nice overall…

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      2 November 2009 at 6:48 pm

      Hi, Supa. I don’t think I’ve ever tried H Duff’s fragrance, although I remember it getting a fairly positive response on the various message boards. Thanks for the comparison!

      Log in to Reply
      • CynthiaW says:
        2 November 2009 at 6:55 pm

        Hmmm… I’ll have to pull out my Hillary Duff With Love and do a side-by-side because I didn’t get that vibe at all. Of course, it’s probably been 18 months since I sprayed on the With Love – I remembered it as being more “amber-y” than Twilight Woods.

        Log in to Reply
  12. jonr951 says:
    15 November 2009 at 1:50 am

    It smells just like Viva La Juicy to me!!! My cuzin LOVES Twilight and LOVES Viva so this is perfect!!! I like it!

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      15 November 2009 at 10:53 am

      Viva La Juicy was *much* too fruity-sweet for me… but I’m glad your cousin was happy with this one!

      Log in to Reply
  13. amy says:
    14 December 2009 at 1:06 pm

    It’s very close to Victoria’s Mood Succulent- which has been discontinued– I thought primary notes were definitely Berry and Vanilla

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      24 December 2009 at 9:50 am

      Amy, I tried Succulent once… I don’t think Twilight Woods is *that* sweet, but I can see the comparison! Fruity vanilla.

      Log in to Reply
  14. _Sweet_Dreams says:
    24 December 2009 at 3:34 am

    I like this one. I am admittedly not a perfume snob, but if you like sweet vanilla-y woods-y things this one is pleasant and wearable. my friend thought this smelled like burberry brit on me- and this costs less, so good deal. it is unfortunate that the name is misleading, it’s definitely not a “dark” or what i would consider a woodsy scent but for what it is, it’s nice. It would be better titled “soft apricot” or something.

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      24 December 2009 at 9:51 am

      SweetDreams, I’m still enjoying my sample, but I agree, the name isn’t quite right for it! It’s sweet and comfy, fruity-woodsy, and well-priced; just not exactly dark or mysterious!!

      Log in to Reply
  15. Dawn says:
    20 February 2010 at 12:46 am

    At the ripe old age of 27, I am loathing a lot of the Bath and Body Works stuff now. It’s just too fruity and sweet to me now.

    Log in to Reply
    • Jessica says:
      20 February 2010 at 4:15 pm

      Hi Dawn, Well, I left 27 behind a long time ago, and I’m not much of a fruit-punch fragrance person… but I do like Twilight Woods and P.S. I Love You. They’re different from some of the earlier scents… maybe B&BW finally realized that some of their customers were getting older and had changing tastes!

      Log in to Reply
  16. asmittenkitten says:
    23 August 2010 at 5:47 pm

    i was really hoping for something much different than what this scent turned out to smell like once on my skin. on me, all i’m getting is vanilla and musk scents. no hint of anything else really, certainly no fruit or florals. it comes off as a dirtier version of their warm vanilla sugar….not in a good way.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

15 March ~ swapmeet

3 April ~ damage poll
26 April ~ splitmeet

3 May ~ spring reading poll
17 May ~ Haiku challenge!

 

Back to Top

Home
Archives
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Books

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2025 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.