• About
  • Login to comment
    • Bluesky
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Archives

Fifi Award winners 2009

Posted by Robin on 27 May 2009 29 Comments

Fifi Awards Logo 2009The Fragrance Foundation of the United States has announced the winners for the 2009 Fifi Awards. The award ceremony was held this evening at the Downtown Armory in New York City. This year’s Hall of Fame Awards went to Marc Jacobs, Davidoff Cool Water and Elizabeth Taylor White Diamonds. Paris Hilton, if you remember, was named Celebrity of the Year. And the winners are:

Women’s Luxe (sold in over 250 doors) ~ Gwen Stefani Harajuku Lovers

Men’s Luxe ~ Sean John I Am King

Women's Nouveau Niche (sold in 51 to 250 doors) ~ Chloé Eau de Parfum

Men's Nouveau Niche ~ Burberry The Beat for Men

Unique Boutique (Men's & Women's; sold in 50 or fewer doors) ~ Tom Ford Private Blend Champaca Absolute

(via fifiawards at twitter, where you can find the winners in all the other categories as well)

See also: the Fragrance Awards page.

Update: "Perfume extraordinaire of the year, recognizing the actual juice of a fine fragrance, went to Mane USA for A travers Le Miroir Thierry Mugler (Groupe Clarins). Mane USA also took home the Technological Breakthrough of the Year award for Aquafine, a technology for creating environmentally friendly water-based scents." (via cosmeticnews)

Filed Under: perfume in the news
Tagged With: awards, fifis, fragrance foundation

Advertisement


29 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. Joe says:
    27 May 2009 at 9:42 pm

    Pardon my pedantry, but isn’t “Harajuku Lovers” five separate fragrances?

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      27 May 2009 at 10:38 pm

      In this context, not sure it matters.

      Log in to Reply
  2. jonr951 says:
    27 May 2009 at 9:52 pm

    yeah womens and mens luxe? r they serious? thats rediculous! I Am King was horrible! It smells like everything else. If not worse then everything else! And Sensuous should have won over harajuku lovers! And yeah did the whole collection win? Oh fifi i am very disappointed!

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      27 May 2009 at 10:46 pm

      Agree on Sensuous. Or possibly the Chanel Eau Premiere. But we have to remember that this year they added a category “Perfume Extraordinaire” that rewards the best juice, so it would seem that what they’re rewarding in these other categories is not the best juice but something else.

      BTW, all they said on the twitter feed about that Perfume Extraordinaire award is that it went to Mane, but I have no idea for which fragrance.

      Log in to Reply
  3. Daisy says:
    27 May 2009 at 10:49 pm

    I’m afraid that my expectations are pretty low for a group that would vote Paris Hilton celeb of the year.
    { NO nod of approval bestowed, gracious or otherwise! }

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      27 May 2009 at 10:53 pm

      LOL — good point. Still say it was probably a wise move though, in terms of getting publicity.

      Log in to Reply
      • Daisy says:
        27 May 2009 at 10:57 pm

        Yup, I’m afraid that things in general seem to be too much about publicity….so I’ll just sit here for a few moments being disappointed in my fellow man….then it’s back to the sewing machine…sigh, why do I wait to the last minute to do projects??

        Log in to Reply
        • Robin says:
          27 May 2009 at 11:07 pm

          I don’t know if it’s publicity or something else. I was looking at the women’s nouveau niche, and it seems to me they picked (IMHO, obviously) easily the most lackluster entry out of the 5 finalists using almost any criteria I can imagine: the juice, the concept, the packaging (although Chloe does have a pretty bottle and an awfully spiffy ribbon). And Chloe’s advertising was hardly what you’d call innovative or exciting. So I really have no idea how they pick.

          Log in to Reply
          • Daisy says:
            28 May 2009 at 6:44 am

            with eyes closed and a strong drink in one hand, perhaps?

  4. Dusan says:
    27 May 2009 at 11:12 pm

    Please…

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      28 May 2009 at 8:07 am

      🙂

      Log in to Reply
  5. Carlos BFL 319 says:
    27 May 2009 at 11:36 pm

    WHAT???

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      28 May 2009 at 8:07 am

      Yep.

      Log in to Reply
  6. thenoseknows says:
    27 May 2009 at 11:37 pm

    Even FiFi has Whored itself down to the lowest common denominator! I AM KING? ARE YOU FREAKING SERIOUS? PARIS HILTON? This is Scandalous and Outrageous! this is the last time i give one WHIT of a care about FiFi in any for or fashion! Just HORRENDOUS!

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      28 May 2009 at 8:08 am

      I don’t think the picks are out of line with what they’ve chosen in other years…

      Log in to Reply
  7. ppr says:
    28 May 2009 at 2:51 am

    I can’t really believe Chloe is niche anything nouveau or ancienne.

    Oy.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      28 May 2009 at 8:09 am

      LOL…perhaps.

      Log in to Reply
  8. HDS1963 says:
    28 May 2009 at 6:02 am

    SEAN JEAN??????

    Oh purrrrlease! Men’s Luxe?

    It’s a mediocre designer scent at best.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      28 May 2009 at 8:09 am

      “Luxe” just means how many stores it’s sold in, nothing more (although also distinguishes from mass, which is discount stores).

      Log in to Reply
      • bergere says:
        28 May 2009 at 10:07 am

        I get their categories based on the number of outlets, but maybe we should translate them. Seems like “luxe” means “full retail, department store”, “niche” means “full retail, more expensive department store”, and “unique boutique” means “full retail, tiny, trendy department store”, not to mention any names. They omitted the category “subluxe”, “sold by retailers that don’t spend a lot on advertising”.

        Log in to Reply
        • Robin says:
          28 May 2009 at 10:26 am

          Oh, that’s absolutely right. And do bear in mind that there are other categories as well, for direct sell & for mass market chains.

          Log in to Reply
  9. Olfacta says:
    28 May 2009 at 6:56 am

    Well I certainly am glad I took the “Fan of the Fifi Awards” or whatever they were calling it off my FB page.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      28 May 2009 at 10:26 am

      That’ll show em 😉

      Log in to Reply
  10. perfumesecrets says:
    28 May 2009 at 2:39 pm

    Once again, I’m not surprised by what was chosen. They are going by what sells and not quality. It’s gotten boring, and I don’t even look forward to hearing the results anymore.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      28 May 2009 at 3:29 pm

      I wonder if it is what sells? I honestly don’t know what the criteria are, but obviously it’s more geared towards the general perfume-buying public than towards perfumistas. Just like the Oscars vis-a-vis the art film fanatics, I suppose…

      Log in to Reply
      • miss kitty v. says:
        28 May 2009 at 5:40 pm

        My understanding–and Robin would probably know better than me–is that companies sort of bid to have their products included. I don’t know if they pay, per se, for the chance to be voted on, but I do recall reading something on their site about having to put in a request or whatnot to be included.

        Am I making any sense?? I feel like my command of the English language is really poor today. 🙁

        Log in to Reply
        • Robin says:
          28 May 2009 at 6:02 pm

          Yes, you have to nominate your scent, and if you aren’t a member then I think you have to pay a fee.

          Log in to Reply
  11. RusticDove says:
    28 May 2009 at 5:42 pm

    What’s next – that the pretentious and unintentionally hilarious commercial for I Am King will win a Clio?!

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      28 May 2009 at 6:02 pm

      Now THAT would be funny!

      Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

18 October ~ fall reading poll

1 November ~ splitmeet

Back to Top

Home
Archives
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Books

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2025 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.