• About
  • Login to comment
    • Bluesky
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Archives

Christian Dior J’Adore ~ fragrance review

Posted by Angela on 15 February 2016 52 Comments

Charlize for Dior J'Adore

Business hotels aren't designed to inspire passion. They’re efficient and bland. They mean to please without offending. Their restaurants are equally uninspiring, with menus full of chicken caesar salads and farmed salmon filets. The hospitality punches in at the time clock inside the basement service entrance. But, boy, do they turn rooms.

You know where I’m going with this. To me, today’s Christian Dior J’Adore gives the same feeling as a middle-tier business hotel. It does a perfume’s job of smelling pretty and clean, but comes off as oddly soulless. Yet, it sells like gangbusters.

Perfumer Calice Becker created J’Adore, and it launched in 1999. Dior lists its notes simply as ylang ylang, damask rose and jasmine sambac. Beyond these notes, I pick out peach, orange blossom, musk, amber and pale wood.

J’Adore Eau de Parfum goes on sharp and clean with watery orange blossom and what smells to me like a sweet, chemical take on lily of the valley. Vague rose, bolstered by dry peach, steps right up, but this is no voluptuous and juicy Lancome Trésor. Instead, the rose-peach combo is scratchy and thin, and the ylang ylang and jasmine are indistinct.

Riding under all this is a sharp woody musk that can show up in fragrances as a sad substitute for oak moss. A clean musk, more like a detergent than a soap, plays a starring role, too. As the fragrance wears down, a hint of amber and vanilla round out J’Adore’s clean feel. At this point, it smells an awful lot like shampoo. Whether this was by design, or because shampoo manufacturers jumped on J’Adore, I don’t know.

They say J’Adore used to be a radiant, beautiful perfume. (See Bois de Jasmin’s thoughtful review.) J’Adore glowed. It was lush without being heavy, floral without being dowdy, and full of chiffon-like depth and light. The old J’Adore somehow made a classic form — the floral — feel modern and approachable without being intrusive. Its success spawned a whole generation of fragrances. Now it’s become a cheapened copy of itself. Like a chain hotel, J'Adore best serves people who want a need met without having to pay a lot of attention.

You can have your airport Westins and Marriotts. Me, I’ll take the old place downtown with the crazy concierge and lobby full of mismatched lamps, threadbare Persian rugs, and the resident tabby cat batting at a vase of garden roses and delphiniums. I hear the bar serves an excellent Sazerac. Let’s call it Hotel Vintage Miss Dior.

Christian Dior J’Adore Eau de Parfum is $74 for 30 ml, $94 for 50 ml, $124 for 100 ml, and $155 for 150 ml. J’Adore also comes in a multitude of other forms, including Extrait, Absolue, Touche de Parfum, L’Or, Voile de Parfum and Eau de Toilette.

Related...

Dior Sauvage ~ fragrance review
Dior: The Perfumes by Chandler Burr ~ book review
Christian Dior Miss Dior Eau Fraiche ~ fragrance review
Christian Dior Escale a Pondichery ~ fragrance review

Filed Under: perfume talk
Tagged With: calice becker, dior

Advertisement


52 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. C.H. says:
    15 February 2016 at 2:25 pm

    RIP old favorite. Thanks for facing this one for us, Angela. I am sorry but not surprised to hear this is what you found.

    Log in to Reply
    • Angela says:
      15 February 2016 at 4:19 pm

      I need to get my hands on some of the old stuff, I think.

      Log in to Reply
  2. Absolute Scentualist says:
    15 February 2016 at 2:31 pm

    When J’Adore first launched, I was starting a new job, taking college classes here and there and really starting to make my way in the world. It was rich but bright, well blended and not screetchy and luminous would be the perfect way to describe it. It was in my top five signature scents back then, and the pool to draw from in regard to that category was much, much smaller.

    I don’t know what’s happened to it since then, but would assume much like most other frags, reformulations have not been kind. The absolue smells very close to what I remember and I am glad I have a generous decant of it because wearing it takes me back to those relatively carefree days.

    Functional can have its place in my wardrobe when I want to smell nice without thinking too hard about it, and J’Adore l’Absolue fits that category quite well. Pretty can work in situations where people may not appreciate my perfumes that have fangs, and J’Adore really worked well for that back in the day. I could wear it to work or a more formal dinner out and it did just fine in either situation, which is always nice. 🙂

    It’s sad but I haven’t loved a new Dior release in years. It doesn’t help I’m still cranky about the whole Miss Dior Cherie thing, either, but I think Midnight Poison was the last Dior I was moved enough to buy.

    Log in to Reply
    • Angela says:
      15 February 2016 at 4:21 pm

      It’s nice, at least, to have the memories. I haven’t tried many of the Dior couture fragrances, but mainstream Dior is pumping them out like baby rabbits.

      I, too, am grouchy about the Miss Dior Cherie business.

      Log in to Reply
    • annemarie says:
      15 February 2016 at 4:47 pm

      I never smelled J’Adore back in the day but from descriptions, have always imagined that L’Absolue is the closest you can get to it today – it seems from what you say that I was right. I’ve toyed with the idea of purchasing, but it’s actually annoyingly expensive, I think, for a fragrance that would only ever be one of those ‘rather nice’, easy-wearing fragrances. I have Eau Premiere for that, a much better piece of work.

      Don’t talk to me about Miss Dior Cherie.

      Log in to Reply
      • Angela says:
        15 February 2016 at 4:51 pm

        Yes. Eau Premiere does the job very well.

        Log in to Reply
  3. littlecooling says:
    15 February 2016 at 2:33 pm

    Yes, the old version of J’adore was absolutely stunning and glowing…but now it is just such a sad version of itself 🙁 So sad to see that tweaking a fragrance is a big no no 🙁

    Log in to Reply
    • Angela says:
      15 February 2016 at 4:21 pm

      Fragrances can be respectfully tweaked, but this one fell apart somewhere along the line!

      Log in to Reply
      • littlecooling says:
        15 February 2016 at 4:58 pm

        I wonder what will happen, if Issey Miyake ever released Le Feu again..I would love it to be as the original..but doubt it will 🙂

        I was happy to smell, that Helmut Lang edp is still the same, after the new release..so, yes, some can be respectfully tweaked 🙂

        Log in to Reply
        • Angela says:
          15 February 2016 at 5:47 pm

          It’s been so long since I’ve smelled Le Feu! I miss it. And I’m glad to hear Helmut Lang came through okay.

          Log in to Reply
          • littlecooling says:
            16 February 2016 at 8:11 am

            I miss Le Feu as well..it was one of those fragrances I couldn’t get enough of at the time. It was so special. I do think the world is ready for it again, if they dare, but I doubt, it will ever be re-released, sadly 🙁

            Yes, Helmut Lang is glorious..but for that price tag, I’m gonna pass 🙁

          • Angela says:
            16 February 2016 at 10:53 am

            I understand on the price tag!

  4. mitsouko says:
    15 February 2016 at 3:07 pm

    It always amazes how J’Adore just sells . I met a lady in Macy’s who said this was her favorite. When she went to Paris, she bought J’Adore.
    Well, I know we are perfume freaks but really, all the way to Paris to buy J’Adore !!
    The J’Adore I have bought OUTSIDE of the USA , smells better than what we get here. The sharp chemically musk is not quite as bad and the perfume is more floral and softer.
    I love your analogy to business hotels. So apt !
    I’ll take Hotel Costes lol 😀

    Log in to Reply
    • Angela says:
      15 February 2016 at 4:22 pm

      I’ll take Hotel Costes, too! And their perfume!

      Log in to Reply
  5. Hera says:
    15 February 2016 at 3:22 pm

    I agree about your description of J’adore of today but I love touche de parfum. I also love to mix it with some sandalwood scents and it is to die for.

    Log in to Reply
    • Angela says:
      15 February 2016 at 4:22 pm

      I smelled the touche de parfum last summer, and I really liked it, too! It didn’t have a lot to do with J’Adore, though.

      Log in to Reply
  6. pixel says:
    15 February 2016 at 3:39 pm

    J’Adore L’Absolu is my absolute favorite mass market frag. Some of the other flankers (Touche de Parfum, L’Or) are rather nice as well. I have a bottle of the original parfum… yes, it’s lovely, but I’m quite happy to wear my L’Absolu as well.

    Log in to Reply
    • Angela says:
      15 February 2016 at 4:23 pm

      It sounds like I really should try some Absolu.

      Log in to Reply
  7. chandler_b says:
    15 February 2016 at 4:29 pm

    Why are the Dior reformulations always so bad? What the heck is going on at Dior!!!

    Log in to Reply
    • Angela says:
      15 February 2016 at 4:46 pm

      I might have a little bit of an answer for that! At some point, LVMH decided to take its perfume production in house and save money. That means that they stopped working with outside perfume companies that might have had proprietary materials–materials that cost more but might have made all the difference. Therefore–to pull an example out of thin air–Dior didn’t depend on a small company outside Grasse to make the concentrate for, say, Diorella. Instead, they approximated the “secret” ingredients the smaller firm might have used in Diorella and saved money. In some cases, the perfume just isn’t the same.

      I’m sure there are other reasons, too, and it varies by fragrance.

      Log in to Reply
      • annemarie says:
        15 February 2016 at 4:52 pm

        I have heard that this was the precise reason Miss Dior Cherie was brought in-house and re-formulated. I never liked it but I respect the opinions of those who loved the original.

        Why bother producing great fragrances when less-than-great fragrances still sell by the bucket load? Depressing. 🙁

        Log in to Reply
        • Angela says:
          15 February 2016 at 5:48 pm

          I know! It just goes to show the power of marketing, I guess.

          Log in to Reply
          • chandler_b says:
            15 February 2016 at 11:03 pm

            Thanks for the answer and may we pray Monsieur Arnault never gets his hands on CHANEL…

          • Angela says:
            16 February 2016 at 12:50 am

            So far, Chanel has stayed in family hands!

      • Jenkr says:
        16 February 2016 at 9:14 am

        Thanks for explaining that. It makes a lot of sense and I can easily see why major companies would so – but by the same token – I can also see why it pisses off so many people when their beloved stand-bys are changed.

        Log in to Reply
        • Angela says:
          16 February 2016 at 10:54 am

          Of course, the customers have no idea until they smell their favorite, and it just isn’t right. *sigh*

          Log in to Reply
  8. annemarie says:
    15 February 2016 at 4:41 pm

    I travel a bit for work and several years ago made the decision to drop the business hotels. Since then I’ve had various adventures staying in inner city pubs and B&Bs. I’ve climbed up to high windows with towels to try and block out the city lights at night; coped with dodgy wi-fi; jack-hammers outside my room at midnight; over decorated chintzy rooms with over-stuffed armchairs, framed prints of kittens, and telephones with flowers painted on them … Once at a B&B I had the house to myself and graciously opened the front door to the guy delivering curry for my dinner.

    I don’t wear J’Adore.

    Log in to Reply
    • Angela says:
      15 February 2016 at 4:47 pm

      And that, my friends, says it all.

      Log in to Reply
  9. sayitisntso says:
    15 February 2016 at 4:52 pm

    I’d read (I think, in the Turin / Sanchez book) that the reason for the difference is that Dior now makes part of the perfume in-house, as opposed to getting the entire formula from whichever big supplier made the original. Maybe they should have left well enough alone, eh?

    Log in to Reply
    • Angela says:
      15 February 2016 at 5:49 pm

      I read that, too. Sadly, as long as it sells well, they probably don’t have much incentive to return to the old arrangement.

      Log in to Reply
  10. sweetgrass says:
    15 February 2016 at 5:51 pm

    I wish I had tried J’Adore in its prime. As it is, I’ve only tried the Absolu, which was still too shampoo-ish for my taste, and Voile de Parfum, which adds iris and was kind of nice, even if it didn’t move me to buy it.

    I think the formula budget must have gone to the lavish commercials. They have used some good music in the ads, though. When I saw (I think) the most recent one, I wondered what the song was, and I ended up finding it on Spotify totally by chance (it was “Hey Now” by London Grammar, if you’re curious).

    Log in to Reply
    • Angela says:
      15 February 2016 at 7:04 pm

      The marketing for J’Adore must cost a fortune! I guess it works, though.

      (And I love London Grammar!)

      Log in to Reply
  11. patuxxa says:
    15 February 2016 at 6:42 pm

    My memory of the original J’Adore is a bit hazy by now, but I recommend you try the new J’Adore Touche de Parfum they just launched… it’s a tiny 20ml vial of perfume-in-oil and it’s just amazing. It does recapture some of the glow J’Adore used to have.

    Log in to Reply
    • Angela says:
      15 February 2016 at 7:05 pm

      I tried the Touche de Parfum, and I did like it. I’ll have to try it again.

      Log in to Reply
  12. kiki says:
    15 February 2016 at 7:06 pm

    Yep, Angela,”meh” pretty much sums up how I feel about J’Adore, and the shampoo-vibe of the whole thing just leaves me feeling bored. I’ve smelled dollar-store body sprays that are as good. I must be the only one who doesn’t remember it ever smelling any better? I can recall being similarly unimpressed when it first came out. And yet, this is a fragrance that inspires rabid devotion – I’ve known several women who use it as their signature scent, and a friend of mine claims that her husband won’t leave her alone when she wears it! So who knows – I always wonder though, when a certain scent leaves me cold (not disgusted or repulsed, just b-o-r-e-d) what others are picking up on that I’m not getting. J’Adore is perhaps the perfect example of that. What strikes me as utterly lifeless can send someone else into ecstasies…guess it just goes to show how much tastes vary, and how individual the sense of smell really is!

    Log in to Reply
    • Angela says:
      15 February 2016 at 7:58 pm

      I second guess myself a lot with fragrance, too, wondering why everyone is so wild about something that doesn’t move me at all. But one thing I’ve learned from writing here is that there’s usually someone out there who agrees with me! It sounds like you and I feel similarly about J’Adore.

      Log in to Reply
      • chandler_b says:
        15 February 2016 at 11:06 pm

        I don’t understand the hype over Le Labo Santal, which is fine by me. #tooexpensive

        Log in to Reply
        • Angela says:
          16 February 2016 at 12:51 am

          So much is too expensive! It really pays to sample carefully.

          Log in to Reply
  13. nozknoz says:
    15 February 2016 at 11:45 pm

    I used to wear 1999 J’Adore at a high altitude, where a perfume must have some oomph to prevail in the thin, dry air. It was the scent of pure happiness. Unfortunately, I gave that bottle away when I moved a few years later, and you can imagine how I felt when I went to replace it in the U.S. and found the tester was merely in sort of a good mood rather than joyous. I’ve bought some partial bottles on ebay, including a parfum, hoping they would be older, but I’m not sure. J’Adore l’Absolu is good but just a bit stolid.

    I’d recommend taking LT’s advice and buying the rose-plum version of J’Adore, BK Liaisons Dangereuses, but I don’t know how it has held up to reformulation. I also think of Puredistance I as a sort of an elegant, wealthy European lady version.

    I’m glad commenters are reminding me to try the Touche de Parfum version.

    Log in to Reply
    • nozknoz says:
      16 February 2016 at 12:27 am

      BTW, at the opposite end of the spectrum from the J’Adore juggernaut, I just noticed this NYT article about Mandy Aftel and the author’s experience creating a bespoke perfume with her:

      http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/03/t-magazine/mandy-aftel-all-natural-perfumer.html?rref=collection%2Fcolumn%2Fon-beauty

      Log in to Reply
      • Angela says:
        16 February 2016 at 12:53 am

        Very nice!

        Log in to Reply
    • Angela says:
      16 February 2016 at 12:53 am

      Now that’s something I hadn’t even thought of: the impact of altitude on fragrance! Someone should do a study. Thank you, too, for the recommendations of Liaisons Dangereuses and Puredistance as possible substitutes.

      Log in to Reply
  14. Jenkr says:
    16 February 2016 at 9:19 am

    That’s such a shame. I loved the original J’adore. I didn’t have a bottle of it, but whenever I had samples, I doused myself in it. I’d also go to the mall and spray myself with the testers. I didn’t have a lot of money then (college days) so buying fragrance just seemed a bit too much.

    When I got into perfume again, I always thought of J’adore and went to the Macy’s counter to find it and try it again. This was probably 4 years ago or so and even then it did not smell anything like the lush, rich scent I remembered. I didn’t buy a bottle, and I’m afraid to even go see if it’s been neutered more based on what you wrote.

    Log in to Reply
    • chandler_b says:
      16 February 2016 at 9:43 am

      I know exactly how you feel! I used to think the most basic stuff was glamorous and expensive, so enchanted by the designer’s names, Armani, Ralph Lauren, Dior, YSL…then a few years later I finally tried some niche and higher end stuff I found from sites like NST… and now I’m “spoilt rotten” as my grandmother would say.

      I do think a lot colognes and perfumes did smell a better a decade ago that now smell like bug spray, but the illusion is also shattered. It is all just expensive branded bug spray!

      Log in to Reply
      • Angela says:
        16 February 2016 at 10:57 am

        What’s really sad is when a favorite vanishes, like Femme! So sad.

        Log in to Reply
    • Angela says:
      16 February 2016 at 10:56 am

      In times like those, I always tell myself that there are still some good perfume houses putting out good fragrances all the time. Sometimes it brings me comfort…

      Log in to Reply
  15. Supersmell says:
    16 February 2016 at 12:19 pm

    Oooh, yes, I couldn’t agree more…Vintage Miss Dior Extrait…it may sound hackneyed: they don’t make them like this anymore.

    This super clean stuff makes me itchy.

    Log in to Reply
    • Angela says:
      16 February 2016 at 12:41 pm

      It’s hackneyed for a reason–because it’s so true! They really don’t make stuff like Miss Dior extrait in all its vintage glory any more.

      Log in to Reply
  16. Annikky says:
    16 February 2016 at 5:45 pm

    I bought a bottle very soon after it launched, it was one of my first proper perfumes and I adored it. I liked the bottle, too, and I’ve always enjoyed the ads. Partly probably because they’ve used two Estonian models through the years and because I think Theron is the perfect match for this perfume (at least as it used to be).

    I’ve been too scared to try the current version. I might give Absolu a try, me and Pixel often agree.

    Log in to Reply
    • Angela says:
      16 February 2016 at 5:51 pm

      I have to say, I really do love the marketing for J’Adore. It comes across as so elegant but modern, and very golden.

      Log in to Reply
  17. TheNoseKnows says:
    17 February 2016 at 4:40 pm

    Oh DEAR! This SADDENS ME SO! My Mother STILL Has her Original Bottle that Me, My Sis and Dad bought for her for Mother’s Day 1999, Very Soon after it launched! I had smelled it in Vogue, a scent strip and LOVED It. went to buy it and spritzed and DOUBLE LOVED IT! if this is what it smells like now, the way you describe, I MUST send you a decant of the Original! Oh it is a HEAVENLY Plum laced Oriental Floral with Heavy, Opulent yet Surprisingly light Oriental tones and notes… It’s got AMAZING Longevity and a good OOMPH of Silage but nothing that’s going to Smother an elevator like Old-School Giorgio of Beverly Hills! This ushered in a Slew of smell-alikes of the Patchouli/Florientals that came afterwards… it’s even in a sense the spiritual Mother of Flowerbomb, just not as Fruity. OY VEY! If they have ruined this masterpiece I don’t know what to say… I have had nothing but good luck with all of the Dior Reformulations… but this sounds Terrible.

    Next time I visit Nordstrom, I’ll get a little empty spray Vial and send you a Decant of the original beauty in all her glory! As Always, Mon Angel… Spectacular Review!

    Log in to Reply
    • Angela says:
      17 February 2016 at 9:18 pm

      Wow–that’s a terrific review! You make the original J’Adore sound like it truly earned its name.

      I would really like to know how you compare the old and new versions. If you try them side by side, please let me know!

      Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

12 July ~ summer reading poll

 

 

Back to Top

Home
Archives
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Books

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2025 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.