The basics: Scandal is the latest from Jean Paul Gaultier, and it purports to be a honey chypre combining an 'elegant aura' with the 'spirit of Pigalle', and reflecting the designer's "vision and feeling about femininity".1 It's the brand's first pillar under licensing arrangements with Puig.
The backstory: Like many feminine fragrances on the market, Scandal purports to reflect the dichotomy in the lives of women — they might want to do responsible things during the day, like hold down jobs and whatnot, and then feel sexy at night. Quelle surprise, right? In this case, Scandal tells the story of Madame La Ministre, who stays out all night partying, gets into her limo, cuts off her evening clothes with scissors, scooches into her business wear, and then steps out of the car at work, where the press is already waiting for her. Am I crazy, or is this story line maybe a wee bit quaint? Does anyone find it scandalous, in 2017, that young women with important jobs might not stay at home knitting in the evenings? Does anyone see a woman out partying at night and assume she does not do anything productive and meaningful with her days? Has time stood still for Gaultier — is he still trying to subvert the same 'bourgeois ideal of femininity' that he nudged with Fragile and Classique? The biggest scandal depicted in the advertising, to my mind, was the gratuitous destruction of the party dress — has Madame Le Ministre not heard about the scourge of fast fashion? (And I do hope she'll find time to fit in a nap and a nice sandwich.)
The juice: Scandal was developed by perfumer Daphné Bugey. The notes include blood orange, grapefruit, gardenia, honey and patchouli. It fits into the story line because it's "very daytime with gardenia and blood orange, and also has a very night side with honey mixed with patchouli".2 (Most unfortunately, there is only one spray nozzle, and I could not figure out how to make it stop shooting out all 24 hours at once.)
What it smells like: It goes on SWEET and LOUD, and it stays that way for the duration. There is an overload of honey, without, to my nose at least, the undertone of urine that sometimes creeps into honey fragrances. There is some bright but flat citrus in the opening and an awful lot of bubblegum-ish fruit. It's joined very quickly by a heavy floral note, sorta / kinda gardenia-ish, I guess, but also sorta / kinda just pinkish perfume flowers, lightly spiced. There is a darkish, woody amber base, mostly clean, with just the lightest dusting of a powder finish. It's not dark enough, or heavy enough on the patchouli, to qualify Scandal for fruitchouli status, and there's likewise plenty of vanilla but it's not creamy enough to qualify as a comfort scent. I wouldn't quite call it linear, but it's close; it has a modern, "no flowers died in the making of this perfume" feel. The lasting power is amazing.
My verdict: There is a sea of heavy and sweet fragrances out there already, and while Scandal did not remind me of any one of them in particular, it reminded me of all of them — that is, it smells very "on trend". I like some unoriginal sweet perfumes myself, but it's not my favorite category and I found Scandal annoying to wear: it just feels clunky to me, for lack of a better term. I felt a mild dislike on the first wearing; by the third outing, I pretty much hated it. If you're a fan of the genre, do give it a shot. I'd say the reviews are mixed, but it has certainly found fans.
The details: Jean Paul Gaultier Scandal is sold in 30, 50 and 80 ml Eau de Parfum and in matching body products. It is on counters over the pond, but will not launch in the US until 2018.
Update: oops, perfumers Fabrice Pellegrin and Christophe Raynaud also worked on Scandal.
1. Via "EXCLUSIVE: Jean Paul Gaultier Creates Scandal" at Women's Wear Daily, 6/15/2017.
2. Ibid.
I find the bottle nice-even better in person-but the juice did not speak to me in any way. I do get that it is moden, but definitely not chypre. The opening is fun, but after half an hour it starts to annoy me. And after 2 hours I had to take a bath and scrub it off 🙁
I agree with you, Robin, it does smell like all the new fragrance out there. I wouldn’t call this Scandal at all, if it was for me to decide 😉 For that I needed something way more daring 😉
But I’m sure many would find it just lovely 🙂
I have not found it any easy thing to scrub off, either — all the times I wore it, I could smell it on clothing I wore *after* I’d showered it off.
Same here..*sigh*
I laughed so hard at not being able to stop the whole 24 hours coming out at once! Great review. I will give it a try if I see it.
I am glad I made you laugh 🙂
Seconded! Although it doesn’t really sound like more nozzles would improve matters…
Probably not!
Thirds! A really good laugh was had here.
Great review Robin. I wish the legs spun around and music played like on those ballerina jewellery-music boxes kids used to have. I wish someone would come up with an ‘in bed by 9pm with a book and a cup of warm milk’ scent.
Oh, it would be way better if it were a wind up music box!
I think a good half of my collection is ‘in bed by 9pm with a book and a cup of warm milk’ — wearing Prada Candy right now (exactly the sort of unoriginal sweet fragrance I like) and it fits!
For some reason I thought that it was a review for some old(er) release (I could swear I’ve seen already those legs – and, judging by your review, this is the most scandalous part of that perfume).
Even though I do not plan to ever test it on skin, I enjoyed reading your review – thank you for the smile.
There was a Revlon scent called Head over Heels with legs sticking up? And I think I heard of another but now I don’t remember what it was.
I just can’t get past the legs copying Head Over Heels.
Thanks for the review!
Its so sugary and sweet. When I smelled it, I immediately feared the dentist hahaha. 😉
Agree, but there really are some terribly sweet scents that I do love so I hate to diss it on that score! I just did not find it appealing at all.
Agreed, sweet can be nice!
But this one was just ‘flat’ and also too shrill and agressive sweet.
Twas a scrubber.