• About
  • Login to comment
    • Bluesky
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Archives

Fifi Awards ~ the 2010 winners

Posted by Robin on 10 June 2010 16 Comments

Fifi Awards logo 2010

The Fragrance Foundation has announced the winners of the 2010 Fifi Awards, known as the "Oscars of the fragrance industry":

Women’s Luxe (sold in over 250 doors) ~ Marc Jacobs Lola

Men’s Luxe ~ Tom Ford Grey Vetiver

Women's Nouveau Niche (sold in 51 to 250 doors) ~ Bond No. 9 Astor Place

Men's Nouveau Niche ~ Bond No. 9 Brooklyn

Unique Boutique (Men's & Women's; sold in 50 or fewer doors) ~ Tom Ford Private Blend White Suede

(via fifiawards at Twitter). I assume that the other category winners will be posted at the Fifi Awards website shortly.

See also: the Fragrance Awards page.

Filed Under: perfume in the news
Tagged With: awards, fifis, fragrance foundation

Advertisement


16 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. annemarie says:
    10 June 2010 at 8:59 pm

    Lola Lola Lola …

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      10 June 2010 at 9:00 pm

      La la la la Lola.

      Log in to Reply
  2. smartylicious says:
    10 June 2010 at 9:09 pm

    Go Tom Ford !! Grey Vetiver AND White Suede. Grey Vetiver was just ok for me, but I do like White Suede. Nothing groundbreaking but very pleasant.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      10 June 2010 at 9:22 pm

      Too bad they couldn’t find something better than “very pleasant” though…I mean, imagine if they actually awarded things that were trend-setters.

      Log in to Reply
      • Kevin says:
        10 June 2010 at 9:32 pm

        Trend-setters, “outsiders” and the like NEED. NOT. APPLY. They should call these the Emmys of the ‘fragrance world’…even duller, more predictable choices than the Oscars! HA!

        Log in to Reply
        • Robin says:
          10 June 2010 at 10:05 pm

          I can understand that they don’t award “outsiders” — that’s not their mission. But if they want to show the world what fragrance can do, they ought to reward things that are a notch above pleasant.

          Log in to Reply
      • smartylicious says:
        10 June 2010 at 10:05 pm

        I know what you mean, but they don’t really go for those. Kevin is right, it’s just like the Grammys or Oscars, they don’t go really go for the bold, unconventional, trend-setter ones.

        Log in to Reply
        • kaos.geo says:
          11 June 2010 at 8:51 am

          As a Battlestar Galactica fan, I can see the analogy with the Emmys…

          Log in to Reply
  3. astrorainfall says:
    10 June 2010 at 10:46 pm

    Hmm… not a very exciting list. I don’t think Lola was that great. I actually have Daisy and did wonder for a long time why it was chosen as perfume of the year but the more I wear it, the more I think this light fragrance does have some complexity to it….

    Maybe it’s the same for Lola….?

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      10 June 2010 at 11:16 pm

      I thought Lola & Daisy were both really well-done…just that if you’re trying to show consumers the best the industry can produce, neither makes the grade IMHO. It is usually how it works in other industries w/ awards too (the best picture of the year rarely wins the Oscar), so this is just basic kvetching, nothing more 🙂

      Log in to Reply
  4. Joe says:
    11 June 2010 at 12:01 am

    I had to look back at your post of the finalists and was scratching my head and saying Huh? I haven’t heard much about many of them.

    That being said, I’m not trashing the awards. I actually like Brooklyn a lot. Haven’t heard one thing about Astor Place or “Perfume”. Apparently FiFi likes Bond.

    Also, I’d be curious to see lists of what people do think would have been appropriate or deserving winners or nominees? We’d have to keep in mind what was eligible not only by date of launch but also brands eligible and the way the categories are carved out. CdG must not be eligilbe at all? I poked around on the FF website but couldn’t easily see much info about which brands participate. Is it a voluntary thing where they pay for membership or something?

    Log in to Reply
    • Ari says:
      11 June 2010 at 7:54 am

      Joe, Astor Place was a thin citrus of no significance whatsoever. This list makes no sense to me.

      Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      11 June 2010 at 8:45 am

      You do have to apply, and if you’re not a member of the FF I think you have to pay to apply? But not sure about the latter part.

      I liked Brooklyn too, but don’t think it is even the best from Bond, much less the best fragrance in that category from 2009.

      Log in to Reply
  5. Flora says:
    11 June 2010 at 1:01 am

    Lola??!?! Really??? It’s the end of the world as we know it…..

    I am sure the Tom Fords deserved it, but giving Lola a major award is insulting to all the perfumers who do really good work on mainstream scents – and yes, they do exist!.

    Log in to Reply
    • CynthiaW says:
      11 June 2010 at 5:43 pm

      I’m pretty sure that something equally as dippy as Lola won last year – I’m just too lazy to look.

      Log in to Reply
  6. Absolute Scentualist says:
    11 June 2010 at 10:51 am

    Agreed. I finally got a sample of Lola and wasn’t exactly underwhelmed. It was just more of what I’d expected, nothing special but pretty enough in an average sense. Both the TFs do sound really nice, but I’ve been put off by the price to try either given I’ve got a few bottles in a similar range I *know* I want to buy.

    Where’s the award for those who’d rather a Sundance, IFC or film school stunner? I had this discussion with my sweetie a couple days ago. It isn’t that there aren’t a lot of good department store frags out there, but there are so many more interesting perfumes that aren’t and tracking down a sample is part of that excitement rather than just grabbing a tester off a huge display at my local drug store. JMHO

    Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

18 October ~ fall reading poll

1 November ~ splitmeet

Back to Top

Home
Archives
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Books

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2025 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.