• About
  • Login to comment
    • Bluesky
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Archives

Bond no. 9 Andy Warhol Success is a Job in New York ~ new fragrance

Posted by Robin on 26 June 2009 66 Comments

Bond no 9 Andy Warhol Success is a Job in New York blue bottleBond no 9 Andy Warhol Success is a Job in New York Orange bottle

Bond no. 9 will launch Andy Warhol Success is a Job in New York, a new fragrance inspired by cash and named for an article Warhol illustrated for Glamour magazine in the 1950s*. Success is a Job in New York is the fourth fragrance in the Bond no. 9 Andy Warhol series, which already includes Andy Warhol Silver Factory, Andy Warhol Union Square and Andy Warhol Lexington Avenue.

Just like money, the scent is genderless—a warm and spicy gourmand. And just like money, it lures and intoxicates all who give it a sniff. Its spicy-citrussy top- notes—coriander, cardamom, mandarin, bergamot—lead into a throbbing heart of jasmine, tuberose, rose, plum and pimento (of all things) that eventually segues into an oriental base of vanilla, patchouli, and amber.

The bottle features an Andy Warhol dollar sign from 1981: blue on one side of the bottle, orange on the other.

Bond no. 9 Andy Warhol Success is a Job in New York will launch in October, in 50 ($145) and 100 ($220) ml Eau de Parfum. (via press release)

* The title was later used for the book Success Is a Job in New York: The Early Art and Business of Andy Warhol. Bond no. 9 is guessing it's the longest fragrance name ever: can that be right? Do comment if you know of a longer one.

Update: the perfumer for Andy Warhol Success Is a Job in New York was Claude Dir.

Filed Under: new fragrances
Tagged With: andy warhol, bond 9

Advertisement


66 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. sweetlife (ahtx) says:
    26 June 2009 at 6:03 pm

    It depends on what you consider part of the name. With brands in tow, for example, there is Acqua di Parma Blu Mediterraneo Fico di Amalfi.

    A gorgeous bottle as always, but I must say it seems terribly out of step with the times. Very pre-October 2008…

    Log in to Reply
    • Joe says:
      26 June 2009 at 6:06 pm

      The price is very pre-October 2008 as well — I don’t know that I realized the B#9s had become so pricey.

      Log in to Reply
      • Robin says:
        26 June 2009 at 6:09 pm

        It’s actually cheaper than the first AW scent. Not that that’s cheap, mind you.

        Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      26 June 2009 at 6:07 pm

      I think they’re counting the whole thing: Bond no. 9 Andy Warhol Success is a Job in New York. It is a darned long name. I like it though.

      I think they see the economic mess as all the more reason — here’s the opening of the press release “Perfumes have always trafficked in the elusive and the taboo. And since nothing could be more elusive than money, particularly in our current economic downturn, we’ve made cash the inspiration and focus for the latest in the Bond No. 9 series of collectible Andy Warhol eaux de parfum”

      Log in to Reply
      • sweetlife (ahtx) says:
        26 June 2009 at 6:47 pm

        Yah, yah, yah. I bet they had this in the pipeline before the crash and then they had to come up with a justification. Not a bad job, but in a city where people are still requesting plain paper bags at Hermes that dollar sign is going to grate on a lot of people’s nerves I’m guessing…

        Log in to Reply
        • Robin says:
          26 June 2009 at 8:07 pm

          You could be right, and the “inspired by money” part is not so interesting to me as the name, which I love. All I can say is that I’m astonished at how many luxury releases we’re still seeing, and by all accounts that market niche is doing better than the mainstream fragrance market. I mean, $145 for 50 ml is nothing compared to what we’re seeing elsewhere.

          Log in to Reply
          • sweetlife (ahtx) says:
            27 June 2009 at 11:57 am

            Totally agree with all of the above, R. The people who were buying handbags for thousands of dollars need something to spend their money on. But though the market is quite definitely there, Warhol’s brand of arch irony and unapologetic love of spendy glamour are just all wrong for the new austerity. Granted this moment will last about five minutes longer, and Bond may indeed be just ahead of the curve…

          • Robin says:
            27 June 2009 at 8:46 pm

            A, are you seeing a “new austerity”? Because it might just be where I live, but I’m really not.

          • sweetlife (ahtx) says:
            28 June 2009 at 5:29 pm

            Well I’m hearing a lot of talk about it, LOL! Charitable giving at schmancy fundraisers is way, way, down across the board–a lot of my non-profit friends are hurting–and there does seem to be a wish for less glitz in the glamour. Not saying at all that people are spending less, just that they wish to be slightly less ostentatious, which, in Texas, is all very relative…

            But as I said above, I don’t have much faith in that moment lasting very long…maybe it’s already over where you live!

          • Robin says:
            28 June 2009 at 6:57 pm

            It seems very regional. Everybody complains about what happened to their retirement $, but I don’t know a single soul who has lost their job…don’t see people living in tent cities except on the news, etc. Bought a new car a couple months ago and the dealership was PACKED…they told me sales were up, up, up, and that people were still mostly buying SUVs.

  2. miss kitty v. says:
    26 June 2009 at 6:18 pm

    I think the name is stupid, the bottle is stupid, and I’ve hated all their other Andy Warhol perfumes. But damned if I won’t give this one a try, too, because I’m a sucker.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      26 June 2009 at 6:29 pm

      LOL…you made me spew my tea!

      I adored Silver Factory and really liked Lexington Avenue, so I’m more hopeful than you 🙂

      Log in to Reply
    • dissed says:
      26 June 2009 at 7:52 pm

      I should print this, frame it and hang it beside the perfume cabinet.

      Log in to Reply
  3. thenoseknows says:
    26 June 2009 at 6:21 pm

    Economic Woes Be Damned! 🙂 If people don’t spend money, then nothing will succeed! I love the notes of this fragrance and have never been really overly impressed with any Bond Fragrance, almost all are good but nothing to drive me mad… THIS Sounds like it will drive me INSANE! in a Grand way! 🙂 I don’t make a lot of money (i work in retail) and am thousands of dollars in Credit card Debt… But i do still save up for the luxuries that i must have to keep one from teetering on the brink of madness or worse… Money should be spent to make one happy as well as keep one alive… but being alive and unhappy is not a perfect marriage! So, be happy while you live and if you want it, save some change to buy it and make yourself happy, you owe it to yourself! I know i will be saving for this one!

    Log in to Reply
    • RusticDove says:
      26 June 2009 at 7:15 pm

      That was awesome.

      Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      26 June 2009 at 8:08 pm

      I’ll go for the “make yourself happy” part, but watch that credit card debt!

      Log in to Reply
    • Tama says:
      26 June 2009 at 9:26 pm

      I needed that! I have a teeny bit of extra money and have been spending it on perfume because I NEED to or DIE – lol. Now I don’t feel quite as guilty – lol.

      But yeah, watch that CC – if you are paying it down and saving for what you want – good for you!

      Log in to Reply
    • Bela says:
      27 June 2009 at 11:13 am

      ‘ I don’t make a lot of money (i work in retail) and am thousands of dollars in Credit card Debt…’ Unbelievable!!!!!

      ‘But i do still save up for the luxuries…’: you cannot save money that doesn’t belong to you. That money belongs to your creditors.

      Log in to Reply
      • Suzanne941 says:
        27 June 2009 at 3:07 pm

        Yes…don’t forget to sock a little away for ‘retirement’ too. You might accidentally live to a ripe old age.
        This probably was in the pipeline prior ot the big collapse. I wonder how much “Wall St.” they’re moving these days?
        But I still love Chinatown & AWSF.

        Log in to Reply
    • krokodilgena says:
      27 June 2009 at 7:52 pm

      My sister likes to spend her money on ~*small luxuries*~ and that’s why we aren’t going on our trip to Germany this summer.
      She tried to buy Black Orchid and I was like “Helloooo this is our hostel in Berlin!!!!!”

      Log in to Reply
  4. Jill says:
    26 June 2009 at 6:39 pm

    Hmm, I’m intrigued by the notes. Even though Bond no. 9’s almost never end up being something I’d wear (regularly anyway), I always seem to want to try them … I really liked Silver Factory, found Union Square too aquatic, and still haven’t tried Lexington Avenue.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      26 June 2009 at 8:09 pm

      I didn’t like Union Square either. The other 2, I really did…Silver Factory, I think, is the most interesting scent Bond has done so far, even outside the AW range.

      Log in to Reply
      • Jill says:
        26 June 2009 at 9:05 pm

        I think Silver Factory is one of my favorite Bonds too … my favorite probably being Chinatown. But I haven’t tried them all!

        Log in to Reply
  5. asuperlongusername says:
    26 June 2009 at 8:31 pm

    I have to admit, those notes aren’t doing a thing for me and don’t sound like anything new from the Bond people.

    I’ve never met anyone else who’s said this but Andy Warhol genuinely scares me. I can’t qualify that with anything concrete but I just get a bad vibe every time I hear something about him.

    I used to wear Chinatown four and a half years ago and, to me, they haven’t made a fragrance that good since.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      26 June 2009 at 10:21 pm

      Chinatown is a great scent. I do think AWSF is as good, but that’s a matter of personal preference obviously!

      Log in to Reply
    • miss kitty v. says:
      26 June 2009 at 10:50 pm

      Hey, Super Long–watch “Factory Girl” and it may qualify some of your vibes. Some of it was fictionalized, but I don’t think it changes the fact that Andy Warhol was not always the kindest man.

      Log in to Reply
      • krokodilgena says:
        27 June 2009 at 6:55 pm

        I think Ciao! Manhattan would qualify any creepy vibes.

        Log in to Reply
    • mals86 says:
      27 June 2009 at 8:23 am

      I think Andy’s sort of creepy, too.

      Log in to Reply
    • lilydale aka Natalie says:
      27 June 2009 at 9:23 am

      I once saw him in New York — outside Saks — and he was pretty darn creepy in person, too. I wonder what he was like back when he was doing his sweetly whimsical illustrations for fashion mags, before he turned himself into “Andy Warhol.”

      Log in to Reply
  6. sharviss says:
    26 June 2009 at 9:13 pm

    I like the name but am not wild about the bottle. I don’t usually like dollar signs as decoration but I guess it makes sense here.
    I am interested in smelling this and am still to new to perfume to be able to tell much from the listed notes. I really liked AW Silver Factory and I quite liked New Haarlem (mmmm breakfast!). I was not so crazy about Chinatown and I didn’t really like Nuits de Noho either. I know I’ve smelled others but I don’t remember them which tells me what I need to know!

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      26 June 2009 at 10:21 pm

      I’m not wild about the bottle either…but I guess it’s fun. And hey, nobody can tell much from the notes.

      Log in to Reply
  7. perfumelaydee says:
    26 June 2009 at 9:28 pm

    Truly love Union Square, purchased both Union Square and Lexington Avenue, but only wear Union Square. I do like the Lexington Avenue bottle. This one I think I will wait for another launch. By the way, wearing Astor Place today, it is wearable, but don’t think I would do a fb.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      26 June 2009 at 10:22 pm

      The Union Square bottle was great. I’d love to have Silver Factory in the Union Square bottle.

      Log in to Reply
  8. Tama says:
    26 June 2009 at 9:28 pm

    I really need to smell more Bonds. I love Chinatown and Silver Factory, and am intrigued by several others.

    Unlike the majority here I am seriously wanting that bottle but I have always liked that image, anyway.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      26 June 2009 at 10:23 pm

      I’m not hating the bottle, I’m just not loving it. Although also think I’d like it better in other colors.

      Log in to Reply
  9. lilydale aka Natalie says:
    26 June 2009 at 10:37 pm

    OK, are we talking number of words? Number of characters, including spaces? Letters?

    B Never Too Busy to Be Beautiful Two Hearts Beating as One = 12 words, 58 characters, 47 letters

    Bond No. 9 Andy Warhol Success Is a Job in New York = 12 words, 51 characters, 39 letters/numbers

    Fail, Bond No. 9! And yes, I am a bit anal, why do you ask?

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      27 June 2009 at 10:36 am

      Excellent, thanks!

      Log in to Reply
    • wondermelmo says:
      27 June 2009 at 3:25 pm

      HAW HAW! You made my day, lilydale!

      And I agree with you, Andy was a creepy gent. I also happened to see him once uptown, standing with a chatty man I didn’t recognize – from across the street I felt unnerved. Good work when you can creep out a party of young punks.

      Log in to Reply
    • Rappleyea says:
      27 June 2009 at 6:28 pm

      ROTFL! Luckily, I had just swallowed and set my cup of tea down before reading Miss Kitty’s comment above. But this one got me! Didn’t spew on the keyboard, but almost choked. Hysterical, and I really appreciate A-R.

      Log in to Reply
  10. nwatts88 says:
    26 June 2009 at 11:32 pm

    I love Andy Warhol Silver Factory. Of all my fragrances I definitely wear it the most often. It genuinely seems to change itself up a bit too, sometimes heavy on the incense, other times heavier on the florals. Craziness.

    And according to most of our world leaders, spending up is the way to quicken recession-recovery, obscene stimulus packages and all. So if Bond no. 9 went nuts on marketing this fragrance on billboards and tv-advertisements and everything grande, it could become an icon for econmic recovery. I mean they’ve done half the work with that title and gorgeous bottle. “NY, big visible (or smellable?) spending is BACK!” (Seriously someone do this, inject some fun into this economic crisis)

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      27 June 2009 at 10:39 am

      SF is a great scent. I might be wrong, but I didn’t remember it being in 50 ml…wonder if it is now?

      Log in to Reply
      • Carlos BFL 319 says:
        27 June 2009 at 11:09 am

        It was only available in 100ml when it was first released. They now offer a 50ml size as well.

        Log in to Reply
        • Robin says:
          27 June 2009 at 8:47 pm

          Thanks Carlos!

          Log in to Reply
  11. Grant says:
    27 June 2009 at 6:05 am

    If we take AWSIAJINY as being 40 characters including spaces, then here’s a selection what I’ve got that’s longer (house is in brackets and not counted in count)

    I’ve included spaces in the char count, as it was quicker..

    The Great Red Dragon And The Woman Clothed With The Sun (BPAL)
    L’Instant de Guerlain Pour Homme Cristaux d’Agrumes (Guerlain)
    The Arrival At The Sabbath And Homage To The Devil (BPAL)
    Insensé Ultramarine Aromatic Ocean – Midnight Swim (Givenchy)
    I Coloniali Aromatic Fragrance of Javanese Cananga (Atkinsons)
    L’Eau d’Issey pour Homme Eau d’Été Summer Edition (Issey Miyake)
    L’Instant de Guerlain Eau de Noël Iris Millésime (Guerlain)
    l’eau de parfum #3 green, green, green and green (Miller et Berteaux)
    Opium pour Homme Poésie de Chine Eau d’Orient (YSL)
    parfums*PARFUMS series 8 Energy C Grapefruit (CdG)
    Essence of United Colors of Benetton Woman

    etc etc

    Log in to Reply
    • mals86 says:
      27 June 2009 at 8:28 am

      Never tried any Black Phoenix Alchemy Lab stuff… but they have really clever names. I think I was intrigued with the Alice in Wonderland scents, and the Shakespeare ones, as far as I remember… BPAL may be the next teeny niche house I investigate, once I’ve smelled the DSH that appeals to me. (Could take a while!)

      I’m pretty sure The Great Red Dragon and the Woman Clothed With the Sun is a William Blake painting AND a reference to Revelations.

      Log in to Reply
      • mals86 says:
        27 June 2009 at 8:29 am

        Now I’m wondering why ELdO copy really, really annoys me while I find BPAL clever…

        Log in to Reply
      • boojum says:
        27 June 2009 at 10:12 am

        Oh, another Alice fan? My sn is from another work by Lewis Carroll. 🙂 I have several of the BPAL Alice scents, have sniffed but not really finished with them. Of course, they’re all oils, and I haven’t had great luck with those.

        Log in to Reply
        • Jill says:
          27 June 2009 at 3:20 pm

          I like BPAL’s White Rabbit and Red Queen, but I don’t have good luck with oils either so haven’t sampled any BPAL in a while.

          Log in to Reply
          • boojum says:
            27 June 2009 at 6:37 pm

            Jill, Red Queen was my favorite too. White Rabbit I only got a quick sniff, bc we got that one for my niece, who seems to have all the same quirky interests I do.

    • Robin says:
      27 June 2009 at 10:41 am

      Perfect, huge thanks Grant! They are counting “Bond no. 9” too, so I think “Black Phoenix Alchemy Lab The Great Red Dragon And The Woman Clothed With The Sun” is the right way to do it…and it wins, hands down!

      Log in to Reply
  12. dissed says:
    27 June 2009 at 9:18 am

    Names, names. I don’t want to say, “I’m wearing Bond No. 9 Blabberty-blabberty-yadda-yadda-boompetybump-tralala.” Would rather say, “You like it? It’s Scent.”

    Log in to Reply
    • Daisy says:
      27 June 2009 at 10:04 am

      AHHAHAHAHAHAHA yeah, that’s right, but now I’ve got coffee in my nose!

      Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      27 June 2009 at 10:41 am

      LOL!

      Log in to Reply
  13. theresa says:
    27 June 2009 at 9:51 am

    Exactly what we all need right now: Money 😉
    Maybe with the power of suggestion, having this big dollar sign in front of us, things will finally start looking up?

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      27 June 2009 at 10:41 am

      Maybe! I’ll take the cash though 😉

      Log in to Reply
  14. Kankuro says:
    27 June 2009 at 1:29 pm

    The bottle looks great! And I love warm, spicy orientals. But most Bond fragrances are smelling like other (and cheaper!) perfumes and stay to close to the skin, so I don’t have big hopes for this one.

    I have only smelled one Andy Warhol fragrance, it was the Union Square. It was horrible, like hairspray!

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      27 June 2009 at 8:51 pm

      Do at least try the Silver Factory…you might not like it, but it’s nothing like hairspray!

      Log in to Reply
  15. APassionateJourney says:
    27 June 2009 at 8:02 pm

    I can’t WAAAAAAIT to smell this! Thanks, Robin!

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      27 June 2009 at 8:52 pm

      De nada!

      Log in to Reply
  16. SmokeyToes says:
    27 June 2009 at 11:52 pm

    Warm, spicy and gourmand?? I am so there, I bet this smells fabulous!
    But, I hate that bottle…

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      28 June 2009 at 6:54 pm

      I still say Bond should let you pick your bottle from all their designs 😉

      Log in to Reply
  17. APassionateJourney says:
    17 July 2009 at 9:06 pm

    I just hope this is a REAL gourmand! They said Bleecker Street was a gourmand

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      18 July 2009 at 11:23 am

      BS wasn’t foody, it’s true, although I think they officially called it an oriental woody gourmand, which wouldn’t necessarily be a sweet dessert scent. This one doesn’t sound like sweet dessert either, does it?

      Log in to Reply
  18. cazaubon says:
    18 August 2009 at 4:00 pm

    I just smelled this on Thursday – it is really yummy. The description is accurate, it is a spicy gourmand, along the same lines as Chinatown and Lexington Avenue (I like it better than Lexington and less than Chinatown). I am definitely going to be buying a bottle of this!

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      19 August 2009 at 11:58 am

      Thanks!

      Log in to Reply
    • APassionateJourney says:
      25 August 2009 at 2:35 am

      Where did you smell this? Are the testers at Saks??

      Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

15 March ~ swapmeet

3 April ~ damage poll
26 April ~ splitmeet

3 May ~ spring reading poll
17 May ~ Haiku challenge!

 

Back to Top

Home
Archives
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Books

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2025 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.