• About
  • Login to comment
    • Facebook
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Perfumers
  • Perfume Houses
  • Shop for perfume
  • Resources

Tom Ford Rose Prick ~ new fragrance

Posted by Robin on 1 February 2020 44 Comments

Tom Ford has launched Rose Prick, a new spicy floral fragrance in the Tom Ford Private Blend collection.

Flesh. Petals. Thorns.

Inspired by Tom Ford's private rose garden, Rose Prick is a wild bouquet of beautiful breeds of rose: Rose de Mai, Turkish and Bulgarian. Sharp and pristine, the piercing prickles of the stems hook onto each other, bonding their blooms in pink perfection. A rose by any other name, wouldn't be Tom Ford.

Additional notes include turmeric, patchouli, Sichuan pepper, roasted tonka and tolu balsam.

Tom Ford Rose Prick is available now at Neiman Marcus, in 50 and 250 ml Eau de Parfum ($335 / $860). (In Canada, it can be found at Holt Renfrew.)

(via neimanmarcus)

Possibly of interest

Tom Ford Soleil de Feu ~ new fragrance
Tom Ford Cherry Smoke & Electric Cherry ~ new fragrances
Tom Ford Rose D’Amalfi, Rose de Chine & Rose de Russie ~ new fragrances

Filed Under: new fragrances
Tagged With: private blend, tom ford

Advertisement


44 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. melissa3boys says:
    1 February 2020 at 10:44 am

    These names are not cute anymore.

    Log in to Reply
    • meredifay says:
      1 February 2020 at 11:00 am

      I agree.

      Log in to Reply
      • stinker_kit says:
        1 February 2020 at 11:04 am

        A Rose by any other name would smell as sweet? Loosely quoting the bard here but I agree, not cute anymore.

        Log in to Reply
    • springpansy says:
      1 February 2020 at 11:13 am

      Were they cute before?

      Log in to Reply
      • stinker_kit says:
        1 February 2020 at 11:22 am

        Tone is hard to project in this format. Cute said with great sarcasm.

        Log in to Reply
      • melissa3boys says:
        1 February 2020 at 11:25 am

        Hmm. NO!

        Log in to Reply
    • cazaubon says:
      1 February 2020 at 11:35 am

      100% agree. I am so over Tom Ford.

      Log in to Reply
      • nathanthomas50 says:
        1 February 2020 at 2:42 pm

        The actual fragrances (which is surely what we should be interested in) or the marketing? I tend to concentrate on what I can smell not the marketing around a fragrance.

        Log in to Reply
    • Baby Dumpling says:
      1 February 2020 at 11:51 am

      You can save a ton of money by using 14yo boys to come up with names. Yawn.

      Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      1 February 2020 at 12:07 pm

      I suspect they are at least part of the reason TFPB sells as well as it does…doubt we have seen the last of them!

      Log in to Reply
      • nathanthomas50 says:
        1 February 2020 at 3:16 pm

        Having had ‘Lost cherry’ I’m sure there’s a flanker in the wings smelling of cherry coke that he’ll call “Popped Cherry”

        Log in to Reply
        • Robin says:
          1 February 2020 at 6:54 pm

          Oh, I would think.

          Log in to Reply
    • PhinClio says:
      1 February 2020 at 2:12 pm

      It is infuriating. Ford himself is anything but a dumb guy (he is, e.g., an intelligent and interesting film director). That his marketing department keeps naming frags like this is kind of inexcusable.

      Log in to Reply
      • nathanthomas50 says:
        1 February 2020 at 2:57 pm

        I’m not sure why people are surprised – This has always been a part of the Tom Ford DNA – this is a man who shaved the Gucci logo into intimate parts of a model, marketed his first fragrances between the legs (& cheeks) of models, used a full frontal male nude to market a fragrance, said that one fragrance was meant to smell like a mans crotch etc, this is quite tame by his standards.

        Many of these are named by Ford himself & all go past him for approval so you can’t blame the marketing department. With Fabulous he took a risk with the name & the possibility that it would limit sales & the retailers who would stock it (because he had the power to do so) but it became one of his biggest sellers ever , the same with Lost Cherry so I guess you could say the problem is with the public who buy the fragrances & ensure that the ‘schoolboy’ names will continue.

        Log in to Reply
        • Robin says:
          1 February 2020 at 6:54 pm

          Agree…this is his MO, clearly.

          Log in to Reply
  2. Jessica says:
    1 February 2020 at 11:30 am

    *yawn*

    Although roses are usually my “beat” here, I don’t think I can be bothered to review this one.

    Log in to Reply
    • nathanthomas50 says:
      1 February 2020 at 3:00 pm

      Don’t worry, you don’t get that much rose , it’s mainly patchouli & tonka

      Log in to Reply
      • mrsdarcy says:
        2 February 2020 at 6:27 am

        Thanks for the heads up. Portrait of a Lady already fills my rose with patchouli spot nicely.

        Log in to Reply
  3. AnnieA says:
    1 February 2020 at 11:53 am

    I think they hired the marketing department full of teenage boys from Etat Libre d’Orange.

    Log in to Reply
    • Jiji says:
      1 February 2020 at 1:00 pm

      Sorry, but thats insulting to ELdO! ?
      I dont own any ELdO but I really like some of their names, Fat electrician, La fin du Monde, and Hermann à mes côtes ma paraissait un ombre…. they make me smile.
      And even though its not everyones cup of tea, i think it IS creative and it tries to avoid clichés.

      Those Tom Ford names on the other hand, are not very creative imho. But I can see how a certain audience will fall for it.
      All marketing.
      Its a pity, because TF has some good fragrances in their portfolio…they dont need to walk/talk this way.

      Log in to Reply
      • nathanthomas50 says:
        1 February 2020 at 3:13 pm

        There’s not much creativity in perfume names generally – I guess it’s better than the word soup of “ Chanel Allure Homme Sport Eau Extreme” etc

        Log in to Reply
      • nathanthomas50 says:
        1 February 2020 at 3:39 pm

        Etat Libre d’Orange Putain des Palaces’s English translation — as supplied by Etat Libre — is “Hotel Slut.” Is that better than Rose Prick ?

        Log in to Reply
        • Jiji says:
          1 February 2020 at 6:20 pm

          Nope. Not at all. ?
          But I did not say I liked ALL of their names.
          I just think ‘some’ of their concepts are more creative than TF/what ‘teenage boys’ can come up with ?

          But in the end I dont care that much for names. I mostly care if the fragrance is good. ‘New York Intense’, sorry but that is a stupid name, great fragrance though! ?

          Log in to Reply
        • austenfan says:
          1 February 2020 at 6:27 pm

          I beg to differ. Not hat I like every single ELdO name, but some are quite good and one is just priceless. Ford I have absolutely no time for. Less to do with the names, more with the tasteless marketing Ford has done in the past and the exorbitant prices.

          Log in to Reply
          • nathanthomas50 says:
            1 February 2020 at 10:20 pm

            This is a fragrance site, so surely its about the fragrance not the marketing or the person? I’ve met Kilian once and find him cheesy & borderline tacky but I love some of his fragrances. Have met Roja Dove a few times & thought him a total **** (& think his marketing & bottles are hideous & his prices ridiculous) , but again I still like the actual smell of some of his fragrances. I won’t hate a beautiful fragrance just because I think the person behind the brand is a **** .

          • austenfan says:
            2 February 2020 at 6:03 am

            Well perhaps you are a better person than I am?

          • Robin says:
            2 February 2020 at 11:42 am

            Ok let’s end this bit of the thread! Everybody has their own way of approaching fragrance brands, doesn’t matter in the end.

    • Jaisalmer says:
      2 February 2020 at 11:27 am

      Sorry but no.
      Etat libre d’orange is totally different. Their fragrances are the best In perfumery . Nothing to do with Tom Ford.

      Log in to Reply
  4. lillyjo says:
    1 February 2020 at 12:22 pm

    I took a class in marketing years ago, where we were shown a commercial featuring a talking toilet, to point out how dumb companies think we are. I see this and all I can think is talking toilet.

    Log in to Reply
    • johanob says:
      1 February 2020 at 1:28 pm

      What Lillyjo said.Lol

      Log in to Reply
    • nathanthomas50 says:
      1 February 2020 at 3:02 pm

      This strategy has made Tom Ford a billionaire – why would he change?

      Log in to Reply
      • lillyjo says:
        1 February 2020 at 3:54 pm

        I can assure you, like every other man in my life, he won’t be changing for me ?

        Log in to Reply
        • nathanthomas50 says:
          1 February 2020 at 3:59 pm

          ?????

          Log in to Reply
        • springpansy says:
          1 February 2020 at 4:50 pm

          Ahaha. So true.

          Log in to Reply
        • rayleighblue says:
          1 February 2020 at 6:45 pm

          I read this and snorted, which was unfortunately timed with a sip of orange juice. XD

          Log in to Reply
        • Robin says:
          1 February 2020 at 6:55 pm

          Right, reality check.

          Log in to Reply
        • melissa3boys says:
          1 February 2020 at 11:54 pm

          Ha!

          Log in to Reply
    • Jalapeno says:
      1 February 2020 at 4:31 pm

      LOL at “talking toilet”! ? Thank you lillyjo, for that! ?

      Log in to Reply
  5. Regina says:
    1 February 2020 at 1:22 pm

    I’m so mad

    Log in to Reply
  6. johanob says:
    1 February 2020 at 1:31 pm

    Shock value last impressed me with that crazy Benetton campaign many years ago.(Divided opinions but they certainly struck a chord with me back then)
    If the fragrance is good I’ll go smell it,otherwise meh….

    Log in to Reply
    • nathanthomas50 says:
      1 February 2020 at 3:05 pm

      For me it’s all about the smells , but I know men who wouldn’t even look at this just because it’s in a pink bottle so I realise that marketing does have a big pull on lots of people even if it’s subconscious

      Log in to Reply
  7. Scent Galaxy says:
    2 February 2020 at 5:33 am

    I’ll try this when I see it but like nathanthomas50 said I suspect this will be full of patchouli which is not always up my alley.

    Log in to Reply
    • nathanthomas50 says:
      2 February 2020 at 1:09 pm

      Rose is definitely in the back seat. On me I got some deja vu as after the patchouli the dry down was heading into Tom Ford’s ‘noir de noir’ territory

      Log in to Reply
  8. littlecooling says:
    3 February 2020 at 2:51 am

    Am I the only one who laughed out loud, when I saw the name of this fragrance? :D
    Doubt I will like this fragrance..I like the pink flacon tho.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

From NST at Twitter

  • "ArtSEA: A seaweed-scented dip into the abyss at the National Nordic Museum" (crosscut) https://t.co/qdhw2os2jV, 24 hours ago
  • "Why All the Cool Kids Smell Like Pistachios Right Now" (harpers bazaar) https://t.co/LbGd9vvrdE,
  • "Lush jumps into action with new Super Mario bath collection" (cosmeticsbusiness) https://t.co/Zz5kXx64DN,
  • "W Editors Share Their All-Time Favorite Fragrances" https://t.co/ynkWuxNwE2,
  • "InterParfums: A Billion-Dollar Multinational With A Start-Up Mindset" (beautymatter) https://t.co/4k8bfGo0bX,

Browse by...

Topic

Perfume talk New fragrances
Shopping Books :: News
Body products Home fragrance
Polls Another subject

Date

February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022

Prior months

Author

Robin Jessica
Angela Kevin
Erin Guest Author

Tag

Celebrity perfumes
Cheap thrills
Collector bottles
Perfumista tip series
Video
The complete tag index

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

3 April ~ damage poll
15 April ~ swap meet

6 May ~ spring reading poll
20 May ~ splitmeet

Back to Top

Home
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy

Shop for Perfume Online
Perfume Shopping in New York
Perfume Shopping in London
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Links
Perfume Books
Fragrance Awards

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2023 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.