• About
  • Login to comment
    • Facebook
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Perfumers
  • Perfume Houses
  • Shop for perfume
  • Resources

Luxury doesn’t explain itself

Posted by Robin on 2 March 2009 33 Comments

I do not create luxury. I am an extremist. I like to see an idea or discussion through to the end. I am an outspoken critic and I do not allow mediocrity. Luxury doesn't explain itself and cannot be consciously intended; it should be immediately apparent.

— Serge Lutens, answering the question "There's a great quote on your website about the vulgarity of trying to create luxury. Is this a contradiction of your positioning?", in Cosmetics International, 1/30/09 (print edition).

Filed Under: perfume in the news
Tagged With: serge lutens

Advertisement


33 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. Anonymous says:
    2 March 2009 at 1:21 pm

    I'm sorry, but can Serge get any more pretentious? I think there are some wonderful things in his line, but every quote I read from him is ridiculous.

    Log in to Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    2 March 2009 at 2:08 pm

    Usually he seems to delight in being as obtuse as possible — in this particular interview he seems to at least have given simple, straightforward answers.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Anonymous says:
    2 March 2009 at 3:20 pm

    I think what he says there is perfectly reasonable: I expect he has in mind brands like Versace or Gucci, for instance, which, I'm afraid, are considered vulgar – and a bit of a joke – outside certain circles (i.e. the nouveaux riches – whatever the source of their 'richesse', and people who've only recently had access to such goods). I'm talking fashion and accessories, but I suppose it also applies to perfume.

    Log in to Reply
  4. Anonymous says:
    2 March 2009 at 4:25 pm

    I have to agree with occhineri… Why does he always need to speak like the Oracle at freakin' Delphi?! I imagine him talking like this to the supermarket checkout person, his dry cleaner, his dog… Maybe I'd feel more forgiving if I loved any of his perfumes, but he's like a bad parody of a French intellectual.

    Log in to Reply
  5. Anonymous says:
    2 March 2009 at 6:40 pm

    J, I would agree with the idea that much of what is intended as luxury is vulgar…but not sure I would agree with the idea that luxury *can't* be intended.

    Log in to Reply
  6. Anonymous says:
    2 March 2009 at 6:41 pm

    I can't imagine SL in any of those scenarios, except maybe talking to a dog. But surely someone else does his errands?

    I do love his perfumes, but I have not loved most of his interviews, and don't care for the way the fragrances are presented to the press.

    Log in to Reply
  7. Anonymous says:
    2 March 2009 at 6:42 pm

    I love how much of a unique character Serge Lutens is—what's more, he seems genuinely obsessed with making exceptional creations. He is “perfumer” as it should be; overly nostalgic and romantic, dramatic and taciturn, viewing the world as a place of creative and sensory abstracts. Most of the time, his words crack me up. But his scents miraculously give meaning to such “Yoda-like” reflections; they hit the sentimental nerve like no other and despite knowing this, the sensation surprises me every time :).

    Log in to Reply
  8. Anonymous says:
    2 March 2009 at 6:55 pm

    “…like the Oracle at freakin' Delphi?!…”

    Hahaha…the best description of the Serge Luten-ese, ever. Reading his personal impressions and the company's press releases, is like reading something written in a hash-up of Tolkien Elvish, Ancient Mesopotamian and “Marlon Brando” mumblings.

    Log in to Reply
  9. Anonymous says:
    2 March 2009 at 6:57 pm

    I always enjoy reading Lutens' pronouncements, although I don't always understand them. I think that is part of their charm. In this instance, I am reminded of Genevieve Dariaux' book 'A guide to elegance':
    “Where elegance is concerned, the greater the luxury, the more discreet it is – until finally, after advancing through more and more exclusive and restricted stages, you reach the point of ultimate luxury, which is imperceptible to everyone but you.” (Dariaux, 1964, 2003, p. 105)

    Log in to Reply
  10. Anonymous says:
    2 March 2009 at 8:59 pm

    thank you SO much for a great belly laugh!!! I'm still shaking with laughter! I can just see him droning on to some poor dog….

    xo

    Log in to Reply
  11. Anonymous says:
    2 March 2009 at 9:30 pm

    But what is the point of being “perfumer as it should be” if the end result is that he cracks people up? I mean, I agree he seems to be obsessed with making exceptional creations, and it's working. But not sure I've found that the scents give meaning to his words. Maybe I'm too dim-witted :-)

    Log in to Reply
  12. Anonymous says:
    2 March 2009 at 9:32 pm

    Great quote, thanks. Nobody understands luxury that way these days: luxury seems to be about ostentatious spending, nothing more.

    Log in to Reply
  13. Anonymous says:
    2 March 2009 at 9:33 pm

    LOL — not the image I intended, but ALWAYS happy to provide a laugh!

    Log in to Reply
  14. Anonymous says:
    2 March 2009 at 11:42 pm

    oh, I'm quite certain that Serge's pooch would respond in equally esoteric and pedantic tones…….now you know why some dogs bite…

    Log in to Reply
  15. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2009 at 12:01 am

    It's true; there's a fine line between abstract prose and meaningless babble. Maybe it's just nasal intoxication speaking for me because after sniffing some of his scents, I'd nod and agree to any dizzy description he'd care to give them “Oh, a flight of the essence of air meaning, against the smile of a Bolshevik horse? That all makes PERFECT sense…”

    Log in to Reply
  16. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2009 at 12:05 am

    I just realized something: Serge Lutens is sort of like the “Bjork” of the fragrance world. Talented but flaky.

    Log in to Reply
  17. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2009 at 12:06 am

    Apparently, his Kung Fu is stronger than mine…..

    Log in to Reply
  18. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2009 at 12:09 am

    Now that's a perfect assessment

    Log in to Reply
  19. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2009 at 7:29 am

    I think I get his point though. Recently I've been talking to a lot of companies – mostly in Switzerland – who create and sell what can only be termed as “luxury goods”. These creators see themselves as artists and are mad about their art. It is normal that, having put enormous work, talent and fabulous materials, to charge a fortune for something they may not even feel like selling anymore, so much soul has been invested into the beautiful watch, pen or piece of jewelry. They care only for beauty and perfection – and the result screams “luxury” but the beauty is greater than the price if that makes sense. The price seems besides the point.

    And most Gucci, Guess and Louis Vuitton fans may have never heard of these brands, it's “connoisseurs only”.

    Snobbish perhaps, but true.

    Log in to Reply
  20. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2009 at 7:29 am

    Then again, Björk is of an endearing, likable flakiness, whereas SL exudes arrogance more than anything else. I do love the image of him orating to his dog, though!

    Log in to Reply
  21. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2009 at 9:51 am

    You guys are making me choke on my tea.

    Log in to Reply
  22. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2009 at 9:59 am

    That resonates nicely with the quote above, thanks. But personally I'd rather have freedom than luxury, and much of freedom seems to me to consist of teaching yourself not to need “things”, or at least, to need as few things as possible. Not a perfumista mantra, to be sure…

    Log in to Reply
  23. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2009 at 11:37 am

    Serge could totally have said that.

    Robin, I wish you'd go back through your archives, pluck some SL gems, and run them all together. Off the top of my head, I recall the blurb for Chypre Noir sounding particularly wacky.

    On the whole, though, my perfume life would be much poorer without SL.

    Log in to Reply
  24. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2009 at 11:38 am

    Duh. Rouge. Chypre Rouge.

    Log in to Reply
  25. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2009 at 12:01 pm

    Between your wish and the meaning of luxury there is no apparent contradiction.

    Personally I've always admired people who have, for example, ONE exquisite shoulder bag that looks like it has travelled the world over and back again (and in glamorous places), ONE exquisite fragrance so you recognize them with your eyes closed, so that no one smells like them etc. Or that fabulous piece of jewelry you can't imagine them without.

    If there could be an association between the word “spartan” and the word “luxury” – is that perhaps “streamlined”? Well that's what I like.

    We human beings are a creation of God. Hence we are more complicated and – if well maintained – more refined than anything our minds and hands can produce. Our bodies and our minds come before any luxury and whoever respects things over their own body, character and life experience is a fool.

    If my earlier comment reads snobbish, it was not intended to be. I can admire exquisite things without needing to own all of them and do not think my life will improve by owning anything.

    Log in to Reply
  26. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2009 at 12:05 pm

    Yeah, I just sprayed some Earl Grey on my 'puter keyboard!

    But I don't want to ask you people to stop making me laugh…

    Log in to Reply
  27. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2009 at 12:10 pm

    My parents have instilled in me an appreciation for things well-made, so I was always suspicious of brands that plastered their logo all over things, trying to scream to everyone that they represent “luxury”. It took working in retail for me to really appreciate it. My friend still works in the handbags & accessories department of a snotty dept store and we've both learned how shoddily made products by Burberry, Dooney & Bourke and Gucci are. Some brands, though, fortunately, do seem to strive for quality (Michael Kors and Kooba are a couple that come to mind). I refuse, to this day, to buy anything that has a logo emblazoned on it. I am not paying exorbitant prices to advertise for their company – I'm looking at you Guess, Gucci, Louis Vuitton!

    Log in to Reply
  28. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2009 at 1:38 pm

    Seriously, look at the comment right above you — brain flash — Bjork should take all those gems and SING them.

    Totally, wholeheartedly agree — being a perfumista without SL would be WAY less interesting.

    Log in to Reply
  29. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2009 at 1:50 pm

    Oh, and if I implied that your comment sounded at all snobbish, I really truly did not mean to! I have been (SLOWLY) skimming through Dana Thomas' “Deluxe: How Luxury Lost It's Luster”, and thinking about how this old world luxury that she is nostalgic for does not appeal to me in the least. I have 3 or 4 things that make me happy: books, perfume, tea, chocolate. I can keep myself in all of those things, and not have to do work I don't enjoy in order to pay for them, by carrying an old beat up cheap handbag, and that's the way I prefer it.

    If somebody else wants to have that perfect handbag, I could care less, and if somebody else wants to earn tons of money so they can have 10 handbags & another hundred pairs of shoes, again, I could care less. Everybody has to find the right balance for their own lives.

    Log in to Reply
  30. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2009 at 1:51 pm

    I don't like logos either. They're hard to avoid these days.

    Log in to Reply
  31. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2009 at 5:27 pm

    hate logos myself – my thought: I will buy a Gucci et al bag when Gucci corp et al buys and displays one of my paintings!

    Works for me!

    xo

    Log in to Reply
  32. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2009 at 8:16 pm

    LOL — perfect!

    Log in to Reply
  33. Anonymous says:
    3 March 2009 at 10:37 pm

    Really! They should pay me to carry their billboard around on their shoulder!

    Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

From NST at Twitter

  • "This Aggressively Scented Watermelon Lip Balm Is Lip Smackers For Adults" (bon appetit on grown alchemist) https://t.co/EdCZI8fEcc, 7 hours ago
  • "10 Beguiling Books For Fragrance Lovers" (bookriot) https://t.co/0L0SktkCkh, 7 hours ago
  • "ernesto neto highlights the cycles of nature in latest installation at tanya bonakdar gallery" (scented exhibit in… https://t.co/qp81Uglhsx,
  • @ChemistBottle Can't disagree...always liked that bottle shape but the colors aren't appealing,
  • Updated info on Guerlain Habit Rouge L'Instinct https://t.co/LwuZCy3gtq https://t.co/exoPnjgQId,

Browse by…

Topic

Perfume talk New fragrances
Shopping Books :: News
Body products Home fragrance
Polls Another subject

Date

April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
Prior months

Author

Robin Jessica
Angela Kevin
Erin Guest Author

Tag

Celebrity perfumes
Cheap thrills
Collector bottles
Perfumista tip series
Video
The complete tag index

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

Back to Top

Home
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy

Shop for Perfume Online
Perfume Shopping in New York
Perfume Shopping in London
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Links
Perfume Books
Fragrance Awards

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2022 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.