• About
  • Login to comment
    • Facebook
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Perfumers
  • Perfume Houses
  • Shop for perfume
  • Resources

Love, Ralph Lauren ~ perfume review

Posted by Robin on 9 December 2008 40 Comments

Ralph Lauren Love fragrance Ralph Lauren Love fragrance

When I heard that Ralph Lauren was going to launch a new perfume in a jewel-studded bottle for some $2000+, I thought: why not — every other brand is jumping on the luxe bandwagon despite these tough economic times, why not Ralph Lauren? A week or so after I first heard about it, I spied a tester of something I didn't recognize hiding behind the tissue box on a Neiman Marcus perfume counter (always peek around the back, you never know what you'll find) and asked what it was. The sales associate told me it was to be the new Ralph Lauren, that it wouldn't launch until later in the year, and that it would be very expensive. She let me spray some on a card. I sniffed, giggled at the audacity of charging so very much for such a thing, and then promptly forgot all about it — easy enough, since Love, Ralph Lauren is not a particularly memorable fragrance.

Later, I realized that it wasn't really so expensive, or at least, it needn't be. The bottle at top left is the luxury limited edition, and it's $2200. It has a 47-carat amethyst in the 24-karat gold painted cap, and it comes with a lucite stand. If you want to blow some money but not quite that much, you can spend $600 and get a 15 ml bottle of the Parfum with a crystal in the cap, and you still get the lucite stand. If you're a real tightwad, you can get the plain bottle with the plain cap (the one shown at top right, although it doesn't look so enthralling in real life without the nice blue background), for $90 (50 ml Eau de Parfum) or $135 (100 ml); sorry, no lucite stand. There's supposedly also a smaller size for $75, but I haven't seen it yet.

What of the juice? It's meant to be an "extravagant floral oriental", and for anyone who missed the fragrance announcement on Now Smell This back in September, I'll repeat what Ralph Lauren had to say about Love:

What I most wanted was for the fragrance to have quality. I wanted it to have some longevity; for the experts to say, ‘This is really special.’ I wanted something that was not this year’s fragrance or the luxury of the moment. (via wmagazine)

He got his wish with the longevity factor; Love, Ralph Lauren lasts pretty much through the day. Whether any experts will find it special I cannot say, but this non-expert found it more serviceable than extravagant. The opening is sweet berry with added "fresh"; it does have some sparkle for a brief time (there's champagne accord in there, along with goji berry, cool green water accord, rose, magnolia, amber, iris, sandalwood, vanilla and patchouli) but there isn't anything special about it, nor does it smell like any extra investment was made in the materials. The dry down is that dark-but-scrubbed-clean ambery-patchouli-woods stuff that is already starting to bore me nearly as much as the ubiquitous fruity florals we've suffered through recently. The sweet fruit lingers through much of the proceedings, but more quietly as time passes; the florals are strong but vague.

Love, Ralph Lauren is fine if perhaps rather dull. I said about the same about Notorious, but actually I like Notorious considerably better than Love. I suppose there are women on earth who will be getting the luxury version of Love for Christmas, and I hope they like it better than I did.

Love, Ralph Lauren can be found at major department stores.

Possibly of interest

Ralph Lauren Pink Pony Romance ~ new fragrance
Ralph Lauren Polo Deep Blue ~ new fragrance
Ralph Lauren Polo Red Remix ~ new fragrance

Filed Under: perfume talk
Tagged With: floriental, ralph lauren

Advertisement


40 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. Anonymous says:
    9 December 2008 at 1:10 pm

    I really like Notorious, and would love to try Love. My mom likes Romance, so maybe she would like Love as well? Right now I'm getting her a bottle of Grosselina by Guerlain, becasue she loves red currants – her favorite fruit. My little luxury-wish is Comme des Garcons + Stephen Jones bottle. I felt bad about the price $175 dollars for a 55ml EdT, but hey it's nowhere close to 2000 or even 600 dollars! I don't feel guilty anymore:))

    Log in to Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    9 December 2008 at 2:06 pm

    Apologies to IrisNobile, but for this sniffer the words 'I liked Notorious considerably better' are the kiss of death.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Anonymous says:
    9 December 2008 at 2:07 pm

    Meh! (Did you know that “meh” was added as a new word to Webster's Dictionary this year? That fact alone is more interesting than RL's Love.)

    Hugs!

    Log in to Reply
  4. Anonymous says:
    9 December 2008 at 2:46 pm

    Good luck on the Stephen Jones, I want a bottle of that too! Will be curious to hear what you think of Love. I do think Notorious is, while not my cup of tea and not a good fit with the name, nice enough and it doesn't smell like everything else on earth. This one struck me as more “generic” for want of a better term — I almost can't remember what it smells like when I'm not wearing it.

    Log in to Reply
  5. Anonymous says:
    9 December 2008 at 2:47 pm

    I am going to be surprised if this finds more fans than Notorious. But then, I've been surprised before!

    Log in to Reply
  6. Anonymous says:
    9 December 2008 at 2:48 pm

    Oh good, it's such a useful word. Hope it gets added to the Scrabble dictionary too, it would come in handy there as well!

    Log in to Reply
  7. Anonymous says:
    9 December 2008 at 3:02 pm

    Joe, when I think of the perfume you could get for $2200 — I mean, if I got this on Xmas morning, I'd cry at the lost opportunity.

    And yes — LUCITE!

    Log in to Reply
  8. Anonymous says:
    9 December 2008 at 4:22 pm

    For $2200 you could fly to Paris and get a Lutens bell jar (and a bottle of Vetiver Elle at duty free on the way home).

    Log in to Reply
  9. Anonymous says:
    9 December 2008 at 4:31 pm

    I may be alone way over here in the corner, but I like Love. It's good for the office, when I'm craving a patchouli/iris/sandalwood/amber thingy but can't go full-on, in-your-face with those notes because, well… I'm at the office. Yep, it's a toned-down version, and not an olfactive tour de force, but I like it. And the bottle is very pretty. Definitely worth a spritz if you happen to be strolling by the counter so you can test it out for yourself.
    Another thing I like about Love is that it shows that Ralph Lauren Fragrances, usually a very conservative company with a clearly defined image, keeps trying to stretch a little and go outside their comfort zone.
    Hey, it's a start…

    Log in to Reply
  10. Anonymous says:
    9 December 2008 at 5:57 pm

    Seriously, for that much I could have a lifetime supply of My Precious. Meh, Ralph, meh. Take that.

    Log in to Reply
  11. Anonymous says:
    9 December 2008 at 5:58 pm

    Meh, now THAT's a word! I like it a LOT better than the fragrance. And backwards, it's hem, a nice throat-clearing judgmental word, that carries the gravitas that Meh avoids.
    LUCITE?? For that kind of cash, I want it displayed on the extended tongues of hovering hummingbirds and decanted onto the ear-tufts of snowy owls who will apply it to my pulse points. Lucite. Meh.

    Log in to Reply
  12. Anonymous says:
    9 December 2008 at 6:15 pm

    “cool green water accord”? Do I even want to know what that smells like?:)

    Log in to Reply
  13. Anonymous says:
    9 December 2008 at 6:26 pm

    They teach classes in that, don't you know — to make sure you don't confuse it with “cool blue water accord” or “cool clear water accord”?

    Log in to Reply
  14. Anonymous says:
    9 December 2008 at 7:30 pm

    I could spend my entire Germany trip fund on the luxury version!!!

    Log in to Reply
  15. Anonymous says:
    9 December 2008 at 8:23 pm

    I didn't try the fragrance yet, but the first bottle with the amethyst reminds me a lot of Princess (vera wang) bottle!

    Log in to Reply
  16. Anonymous says:
    9 December 2008 at 8:49 pm

    And Precious could have it's own lifetime supply of something to boot…

    Log in to Reply
  17. Anonymous says:
    9 December 2008 at 8:50 pm

    LOL on both points, nicely put.

    Log in to Reply
  18. Anonymous says:
    9 December 2008 at 9:11 pm

    LOL! To me, it just smelled a bit fresh in the top notes — I didn't find it very green or very aquatic.

    Log in to Reply
  19. Anonymous says:
    9 December 2008 at 9:50 pm

    It sounds as if the scent is safe (practical in use, long-lasting, fine and not overbearing) but dull. Despite the use of real crystals and amethysts to design the bottle, it seems not worth the 2 grand when it comes to the scent, overally…

    Log in to Reply
  20. Anonymous says:
    9 December 2008 at 11:36 pm

    There you go. See, we're all saving money.

    Log in to Reply
  21. Anonymous says:
    9 December 2008 at 11:38 pm

    Of course you can have it for $75, if it turns out you adore it — but yes, I'd call it safe but dull.

    Log in to Reply
  22. Anonymous says:
    10 December 2008 at 4:17 am

    Please, could You guys name a few mainstream fragrances with the above mentioned “dark-but-scrubbed-clean ambery-patchouli-woods stuff”? As a novis I'd like to train my nose and try to detect that accord…

    Log in to Reply
  23. Anonymous says:
    10 December 2008 at 6:40 am

    Well, I have tried Love twice on card, and am afraid to say it didn't make enough of an impression for me to remember clearly what it smelled like on either occasion. I think the first time I did get a whiff of “nondescript, slightly luxury floral”, and the second time I got “nondescript floral” and couldn't detect the luxury. I need to try this properly on skin, but in Harrods one simply has so many distractions.

    Log in to Reply
  24. Anonymous says:
    10 December 2008 at 8:11 am

    My guy got me the luxury edition !! i love it :)

    Log in to Reply
  25. Anonymous says:
    10 December 2008 at 10:16 am

    I was just thinking the same thing! For $2K I could fly to Paris, and buy whatever I wanted from Guerlain, Montale, Amouage, etc…..

    Log in to Reply
  26. Anonymous says:
    10 December 2008 at 10:30 am

    I don't know if they're scrubbed clean, but when I think ambery-patchouli-woods stuff, I think of Prada, Stella Rose Absolute, Tom Ford White Patchouli, etc.

    If you are looking for a good way to research by notes, visit the Perfumed Court and click on “Perfumes by Notes” – its a good way to browse & learn.

    Log in to Reply
  27. Anonymous says:
    10 December 2008 at 10:37 am

    Maltesia, it isn't an accord really, maybe more accurate to call it a “style”. But I would think of DKNY Be Delicious Night, Tom Ford White Patchouli, Gucci by Gucci, Elle Yves Saint Laurent, Christian Dior Midnight Poison, etc.

    Log in to Reply
  28. Anonymous says:
    10 December 2008 at 10:39 am

    If you got the “luxury” even once, you got it more than I did. There are perfumes that smell expensive (Amouage Gold, Joy extrait) and perfumes that smell like they're supposed to smell expensive (David Yurman), this one didn't strike me as either.

    Log in to Reply
  29. Anonymous says:
    10 December 2008 at 10:40 am

    Congrats and wear it in happiness :-)

    Log in to Reply
  30. Anonymous says:
    10 December 2008 at 11:34 am

    The first trial was under the watchful eye of the SA, who was really talking up the luxurious aspect, so my impressions may have been based on the power of suggestion – like the time my dad persuaded me to eat pistachio ice cream as a kid by swearing it was lime.

    Log in to Reply
  31. Anonymous says:
    10 December 2008 at 11:53 am

    definitely meh…smelled this a few months back by chance- immediatly non-plussed and can't remember much about it- soft floral.

    For this kind of cash, I'm going to Paris with Monkeytoe ;-)

    Log in to Reply
  32. Anonymous says:
    10 December 2008 at 7:55 pm

    I was thinking it was water filled with those little green algae that float on the surface.

    Log in to Reply
  33. Anonymous says:
    10 December 2008 at 8:00 pm

    LOL — and did you like the pistachio ice cream?

    Log in to Reply
  34. Anonymous says:
    11 December 2008 at 2:04 am

    You are not alone in your corner. I like most R.L. scents and I'm a pretty cool decent person. It will sell well, because it is targeted for the normal people who are not connoisseurs. I didn't even know about *niche* fragrances before I became interested in perfume making, about 4 years ago.

    Most people DON'T even know about niche.

    And Ralph Lauren makes scents for those in the majority. There are still quite a few people who don't have a computer or the Internet.

    There are a couple of gourmet food stores here, but most people just go to the grocery store.

    Joy and happy smelling Liongirl,

    -Becca

    Log in to Reply
  35. Anonymous says:
    11 December 2008 at 5:02 am

    Thank You AnnS and NST. It's informative to hear it's more of a style than an accord. And thanks for the examples. That tells a lot. “Hunting” by official notes (or accords) is difficult because descriptions don't match the reality. I'm thinking about your article on that subject here on NST…

    Log in to Reply
  36. Anonymous says:
    11 December 2008 at 7:15 am

    I'm sure Mariah Carey and some other “princessy” girls out there would love that amethyst canister but as a recessionista I'll stick to the plain jane bottles. Also; I can't really decide if it's a good thing that a fragrance is not really that much to remember; some fragrances have left me with offlicatory scars (?). Maybe bland isn't so bad?

    Log in to Reply
  37. Anonymous says:
    11 December 2008 at 8:19 am

    Lovely image, thanks ;-)

    Log in to Reply
  38. Anonymous says:
    11 December 2008 at 9:42 am

    At the time I liked it every bit as much as the lime I thought it was. When my dad revealed his ploy, I went back to hating it and have not touched the stuff since. And for that matter I wasn't too pleased with my dad either, but it shows how easy it is for us all to be Svengali!..: – )

    Log in to Reply
  39. Anonymous says:
    11 December 2008 at 11:57 am

    This one isn't bland, exactly — it's sort of strong, in fact. Just doesn't have a ton of personality, to me at least.

    Log in to Reply
  40. Anonymous says:
    11 December 2008 at 11:58 am

    Yeah, that would make me hate it too!

    Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement


Luckyscent

Search

Browse by…

Topic

Perfume talk New fragrances
Shopping Books :: News
Body products Home fragrance
Polls Another subject

Date

December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
Prior months

Author

Robin Jessica
Angela Kevin
Erin Guest Author

Tag

Celebrity perfumes
Cheap thrills
Collector bottles
Perfumista tip series
Video
The complete tag index

From NST at Twitter

  • Headline of the day: "Gwyneth Paltrow’s vagina-scented candle almost burns down home of woman who won it in a quiz" https://t.co/F6bvZtoSXl,
  • "Jo Loves adopts refillable technology for Fragrance Paintbrush" (cosmeticsbusiness) https://t.co/sn2tZ1cguT,
  • @robini71 And my favorite honeysuckle is also limited edition -- Goutal Le Chevrefeuille. They do bring it back eve… https://t.co/MFGwHJK0Ji,

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

TBA April ~ freebiemeet

Back to Top

Home
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy

Shop for Perfume Online
Perfume Shopping in New York
Perfume Shopping in London
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Links
Perfume Books
Fragrance Awards

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2021 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.