• About
  • Login to comment
    • Bluesky
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Archives

Courting controversy, part 3

Posted by Robin on 18 September 2007 22 Comments

That Sean John commercial that MTV refused to air (see Courting Controversy, part 1) is now available at YouTube's DiddyTV channel. You can watch it here (warning: NSFW, although maybe not quite so NSFW as the Tom Ford ads from Courting Controversy, part 2). If you still want more:

In what is believed to be a fragrance-launch first, the rapper will broadcast the party for his new Unforgivable for Women scent live on YouTube. The party, set for Wednesday night at a townhouse on New York's Upper East Side, will feature red-carpet arrivals — Aretha Franklin and Usher are expected — and random moments from the party (cameras will be set up on each floor of the townhouse to catch all that's unforgivable). (via Women's Wear Daily)

Update: per Sean "Diddy" Combs, "Since we launched the Sean John brand 10 years ago, we have taken chances and done many non-traditional things. This three minute movie is no different; it will revolutionize the way people view fragrances forever." (via prnewswire)

Filed Under: perfume in the news
Tagged With: celebrity perfumes, sean john

Advertisement


22 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. Anonymous says:
    18 September 2007 at 9:22 am

    Sorry – it's not titillating, and although I don't find it controversial from a sexual standpoint (considering everything alluded to wouldn't be considered shocking in private to most people), I don't think anyone really needs to see that on tv – well, at least from an ad standpoint. Sex certainly has its place in a relevant plotline, but this is just ol' Diddy letting us know that he can pick up the ladies – or is that laydeez. Seriously though, did she just not look very interested through most of it..and dare I say…lethargic? LOL. As to Mr Ford's recent hoo-ha (literally and figuratively), that's just trying to be OTT to the point of laughability – there's no undercurrent, no thinking spark to it, unlike, say Helmut Newton photography.

    Log in to Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    18 September 2007 at 9:32 am

    Have to agree, it is curiously flat, despite all the nudity. They both looked like they were just going through the motions. I found the videos surrounding S”D”C's search for a new personal assistant much more entertaining.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Anonymous says:
    18 September 2007 at 9:36 am

    Oh, and I should add – hasn't Diddy just totally ignored the point of good advertising? The dominant focus is on Diddy. This ad is (regardless of whether or not her perfume was so bewitching it made Diddy pick her up) almost saying, if you wear this, maybe someone will pick you up too. Eh? Doesn't that alienate potential female buyers? This stuff is going to end up the perfume equivalent of crotchless underwear and patent leather thigh boots (guy: 'hey, those are nice'. girl: 'you're sleeping on the couch'). A guy (presumably the younger, less wiser ones) will buy it for his girl or his potential paramour in the hope he too, will be 'The Diddy'. If the girl's got any sense she'll treat it the same as the aforementioned and turn around and tell him to return it and get her something decent.

    Log in to Reply
  4. Anonymous says:
    18 September 2007 at 9:45 am

    You know, the idea of buying a scent because it is from a celebrity or you saw a television commercial and liked the commercial is just so foreign to me that I couldn't say whether the ad “works” or not. I mean, maybe all you need is something that gets tons of press, and if so, this works very well indeed. It is everywhere, and zillions of people are going to watch it w/o even having to pay for the air time on MTV.

    Log in to Reply
  5. Anonymous says:
    18 September 2007 at 9:48 am

    Very true, and reflective of society at the moment – it doesn't matter if what's out there is crap as long as it's out there.

    Log in to Reply
  6. Anonymous says:
    18 September 2007 at 10:00 am

    First of all, it's tedious and tepid viewing. Second, it's about as erotic as a wet kipper. Third, it had all the class and style of a fart at the supper table.
    Definitely poor.

    Log in to Reply
  7. Anonymous says:
    18 September 2007 at 10:23 am

    It is tepid, isn't it? I don't watch MTV any more, but from what I remember, most of the videos were a lot racier than this one. Just less nudity.

    Log in to Reply
  8. Anonymous says:
    18 September 2007 at 10:50 am

    I laughed. Somehow I'm thinking that's not the reaction Diddy was looking for.
    That Tom Ford ad is *disgusting.* The crotch one; I'd missed that. I'll never touch a bottle again — who knows where it's been? And the whole Terry Richardson cult has always baffled me. He's got all the charm of a flasher in a raincoat.

    Log in to Reply
  9. Anonymous says:
    18 September 2007 at 11:00 am

    Ooh! NST needs to borrow that – start the 'wet kipper' rating system for so called 'sexy' celeb scents :-p

    Log in to Reply
  10. Anonymous says:
    18 September 2007 at 11:13 am

    LOL — true!

    Log in to Reply
  11. Anonymous says:
    18 September 2007 at 11:17 am

    LOL at “who knows where its been” — its true that I'll never be able to look at the bottle w/o that picture in my mind.

    Log in to Reply
  12. Anonymous says:
    18 September 2007 at 12:36 pm

    Need to have a scale: One wet kipper is just sort of “meh”, five wet kippers is truly revolting (Tom Ford ads would seem to rate five wet kippers).

    Log in to Reply
  13. Anonymous says:
    18 September 2007 at 1:38 pm

    Wow… That was *really* dull viewing. And my DH just said, “This goes on FOREVER! I can't watch this whole thing!” and left the room. So much for titillation!
    I also laughed every time Puff Daddy made eye contact with the camera during an, uh, “intimate” moment. What a ham.

    Log in to Reply
  14. Anonymous says:
    18 September 2007 at 8:22 pm

    It really isn't interesting enough for the length. They'd do better to edit it anyway, MTV or no MTV. But it is interesting to read the comments on YouTube, which seem divided between “hot” and “boring”.

    Log in to Reply
  15. Anonymous says:
    18 September 2007 at 8:32 pm

    LOL, you are all hilarious! “Wet Kipper ratings”! “What a ham”! “Who knows where it's been?”

    Ahhhh you guys are all great. I really must learn to turn this all into a big joke like you do, rather than allow myself to feel FURIOUS at these ads, which I am sure is their real intention!

    xx

    Log in to Reply
  16. Anonymous says:
    18 September 2007 at 9:41 pm

    You mean it isn't all a big joke? j/k. Maybe I should be furious; it all seems too juvenile to get worked up over.

    Log in to Reply
  17. Anonymous says:
    19 September 2007 at 12:34 pm

    I don't even get the joke. I feel so out of the pop culture loop!!! They both looked so bored — just like I was. Ho-hum. Of all the celeb fragrances out there, Unforgivable is the least appealing in terms of whatever philosophy/lifestyle/image it is supposed to represent. Duh – ull with a side order of ick.

    Log in to Reply
  18. Anonymous says:
    19 September 2007 at 12:58 pm

    You would be hard pressed to be more out of the pop culture loop than I am. I only know who famous people are after they release perfumes and I consult Wikipedia or Google.

    Agree: this is not an appealing scenario.

    Log in to Reply
  19. Anonymous says:
    19 September 2007 at 2:35 pm

    I would imagine we are both out of the loop by choice. I don't even own a television set! Stuff out there kind of saddens me: the celebrity obsession, the nastiness/negativity, the sexualization of virtually everything. That's why I follow your site regularly, R. It reminds me of the beauty that's out there, in fragrance, in literature, in good film. That's what I love and want to focus on. By the way, you might like Becoming Jane, if you're not stuck on pure historical factuality. Anne Hathaway is just luminous, the costumes are simple and lovely, the countryside delectable, the language delicious, the emotions tender and real. Wish popular culture was more about Jane Austen and less about What's-his-diddy, et al

    Log in to Reply
  20. Anonymous says:
    19 September 2007 at 5:11 pm

    Oh no, I watch lots of TV — just mostly on DVD, because I hate commercials and hard to stick to a certain time slot every week. But watch The Office, House, Extras, Curb Your Enthusiasm, and Jon Stewart. But it is amazing how much you miss when you don't see commercials or watch any of the gossip or reality shows. Whole celeb sagas pass me by.

    I don't think of myself as stuck on historical factuality, but am such a huge Jane Austen fan that I might have trouble with Becoming Jane. Have it in my Netflix queue and will certainly watch it, but will probably complain up a storm 😉

    Log in to Reply
  21. Anonymous says:
    19 September 2007 at 5:40 pm

    You'll roll your eyes at the pure, unadulterated fantasy-view of Jane's fictional Love-of-My-Life affair, then, for sure. I needed some pure, unadulterated romantic escapism and that's what the film delivered. I did love Ratatouille, too: when Anton Ego, the hyper-critical food critic, has a bite of Chef's modern ratatouille redux and has a flashback to his happy garlic-infused childhood, it just could NOT have been done better. So forget Jane and go with the rat!

    Log in to Reply
  22. Anonymous says:
    19 September 2007 at 8:48 pm

    No, no, I'll watch both eventually I'm sure! Just have to wait for them to get to DVD. We almost never make it to the theater these days.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

12 July ~ summer reading poll

 

 

Back to Top

Home
Archives
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Books

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2025 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.