• About
  • Login to comment
    • Facebook
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Perfumers
  • Perfume Houses
  • Shop for perfume
  • Resources

News flash: there are WAY too many perfumes

Posted by Robin on 22 February 2007 42 Comments

avalancheNo fragrance review today, sorry. Just keeping up with the new releases is becoming very nearly a full time job, and leaves very little time for actually smelling anything, much less writing a review. According to Michael Edwards' Fragrances of the World database, there were 693 new fragrance launches in 2006 (via moodiereport), and this little tidbit appeared in today's New York Times article about Chanel:

Kate Greene, the vice president for marketing fine fragrances in North America at Givaudan, said that 800 new fragrances are expected to make their appearance in 2007.

800! That is over 2 a day, people. And strictly speaking, both figures (693 and 800) are undercounts, since they don't include the zillions of independent perfume releases that don't make it into the official counts. If you want to keep up with Black Phoenix Alchemy Lab (here are their latest releases, I was going to count them but gave up) and what is in the department stores, you have quite a task ahead of you this year.

How is a perfumista to keep up? Come December, will we even care what launch no. 799 smells like? Even two years ago, I very much wanted to smell everything new; now, it is hard to summon any enthusiasm even for the major releases. Just thinking about the 12 (12!!) fragrances in the upcoming Private Blend from Tom Ford makes me weary — after all, it took me two days just to get the aromas of the 6 new Les Exclusifs de Chanel correctly matched up with their names. I forgot which of the three new garden scents from The Different Company was which within minutes of putting them on, and I have to confess that I never went back to figure it out. The names were too long to remember anyway.

I shouldn't complain; the real sympathy should be reserved for a) the perfumer who is handed another brief for a fresh fruity floral to appeal to 19 years olds, to be completed by next Thursday, and b) the poor marketing people who face the Herculean task of trying to get consumers to pay attention to the latest perfume launch. You just about have to name your fragrance Don't Get Me Wrong Baby, I Don't Swallow to get anyone to listen.

There, that took me just as long to write as a fragrance review. Isn't that the way?

Note: avalanche image via University of Maryland.

Filed Under: perfume talk

Advertisement


42 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 12:11 pm

    In the eighties, when I started wearing fragrances, there were only about 800 scents on the market. Maybe a thousand. The idea that there will be more or less that many launched in a single year is mind-warping. Most of them will die, of course, but they will still have existed, and next year there'll be more hundreds of new scents, and hundreds more new ones the year after that.

    I'm like you; I want to smell everything. But who could possibly keep up?

    Log in to Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 12:15 pm

    I think I'm going to have a nervous breakdown if I don't successfully repress this information.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 12:27 pm

    I certainly hope I'm not still blogging when they hit 1000 a year, which at this rate, won't be long from now.

    There is, of course, no incentive for an individual company to cut back, but they all lose if they don't find a way to slow it down. Advertising a new fragrance has become outrageously expensive, and the returns are hardly worth it unless you end up with a blockbuster.

    Log in to Reply
  4. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 12:28 pm

    What information? Nothing to see here, move on please.

    Log in to Reply
  5. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 12:36 pm

    It's simply ridiculous, isn't it? I've found that I've become ruthless abut new scents; where I would once rush to arm-test just about everything, now I sniff briefly at the sprayer or ignore altogether. The juices that get skin-room have to be REALLY interesting, and if they haven't developed into something good within 15 minutes I get the sponge out… Life is too short to waste on Britney's Out of Control Midnight Curiosity, or even a Serge that takes 2 hours to get to a place where you don't have to wrap your arm in towels to stop your eyes watering…

    Log in to Reply
  6. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 12:42 pm

    I agree. I am tired. Please, somebody, make them stop for a little while. :-) Of course one could make a decision not to try the new releases but somehow one gets caught up in a hype and can't rest till one gets to sniff the most exciting ones…arrgh

    Log in to Reply
  7. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 12:46 pm

    Well, that will make your life easier, LOL…no way will I review even a 10th of this year's output :-)

    Log in to Reply
  8. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 12:48 pm

    N, your last sentence absolutely cracked me up…the funny thing is that something just about has to make me “wrap my arm in towels to stop my eyes from watering” in order to get my attention. I am becoming more and more partial to weirdness in perfume, just to relieve the boredom of effervescent fruity florals.

    Log in to Reply
  9. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 12:55 pm

    Great article, R! I think that there will be cuts very soon and that many niche companies will tank (the ones that produce the same dull stuff as everyone else). Some Darwinian selection of species must take place. The ironic thing is that the juice is the least important aspect of a fragrance launch. So, we have more and more fragrance with less and less interesting scent.

    Log in to Reply
  10. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 12:59 pm

    Me too! Me too! *jumping up and down*

    Log in to Reply
  11. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 1:04 pm

    Me too. I live vicariously re. most things, anyway. I don't care to test everything any longer (or even a tiny proportion of the new stuff).

    There are too many books being published too. It's not just perfumes one can't keep up with these days.

    Log in to Reply
  12. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 1:07 pm

    What's become of the 'quality over quantity' motto?

    Log in to Reply
  13. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 1:11 pm

    M, I think I am way more jaded than you. There are many new scents on this year's list of upcoming releases that I want to try, that I'm even looking forward to trying. But there isn't a single one that I'd *rush* to the store to try, or that I'd jump through hoops to get a sample of. I can rest just fine, knowing that most of what comes is going to be dull beyond all imagining. It is saving me money too, since as near as I can tell, the more they release, the less I want to buy.

    Log in to Reply
  14. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 1:15 pm

    So very true! For many years, I read 3 book publications religiously: The New York Review of Books, The New York Times Book Review, and The Washington Post Book Review. I let them all go last year, I just couldn't take it anymore — it was just a constant reminder that I could no longer keep up with the output.

    Log in to Reply
  15. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 1:18 pm

    It died. Somewhere recently I read an old quote from Estee Lauder about how a new perfume had to have several years on the counter to find its audience…boy, those days are gone. No more counter space left for a perfume that can't find its audience immediately. It is just like the movies — it has to make millions in the first weekend or it is a failure.

    Log in to Reply
  16. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 1:19 pm

    Yes, I've found myself in the 'Mentholated Rubber – kewl!' zone more and more often. However last week H sniffed my neck tenderly…then sniffed round the downstairs loo…. “I think there's a sewage backup somewhere,” he explained. I wondered aloud why my sillage had been his first point of call, and he pointed out that some of my perfume choices are…'adventurous'. Perhaps I've gone one step too far down the Path of Perfume Weirdness?

    Log in to Reply
  17. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 1:20 pm

    What is really sad is that niche companies will fold and nobody will even notice…we'll all be too busy reading about the latest launches. And completely agree that the juice is an afterthought 90% of the time.

    Log in to Reply
  18. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 1:25 pm

    LOL! That is hysterical.

    But it is true, the only antidote to the latest Cherry Blossom Hello Kitty Pink Glitter (Victoriaf's invention, BTW) is to spray on a bit of something a little odd.

    Log in to Reply
  19. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 1:28 pm

    It really is ridiculous and why I basically don't even bother w/ dept. store scents any longer. I just don't have the time, patience or money. I rely on the blogs and perfume boards to alert me to the stand outs and just focus on the limited number that possibly merit some attention. However, as has been discussed here before, it annoys me to no end when there are multiple simultaneous exclusive releases (yes, I'm looking right at you, Tom). Spread. Them. Out. Oh, and speaking of multiple releases – I called up Matthew Williamson's head office and spoke to someone named Melissa who said that the Incense in the Collection is the only incense they'll be releasing this year. She said she couldn't comment on whether or not the original will *ever* be rereleased, but she said it wouldn't be this year and she made it sound like it was just a bit unlikely it ever would.

    Log in to Reply
  20. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 1:42 pm

    So agree with Spread. Them. Out. — it would have been cool to have 1 a month, even. As it is, now Tom Ford is virtually inviting comparison to the new Chanels, and while I'm quite prepared to be pleasantly surprised, that doesn't seem likely to work out in his favor.

    And thanks for the info on MW — that is about what I figured.

    Log in to Reply
  21. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 2:40 pm

    Yep, books and perfume–two of my favorite things in life! But I read the LA Times Book Review section, and I become so frustrated. Too many books that I want to read, so little time.

    And, I haven't even gotten through my Chanel Exclusifs decants. I am wearing the third one today, and will probably postpone testing the Eau de Cologne one until the weather gets warmer.

    And, don't even talk to me about the Tom Ford releases. I am skipping that one altogether. I'm just not going to go there…really!

    Hugs!

    Log in to Reply
  22. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 2:44 pm

    I'm really impressed with the new layout–it's lovely and the blue backdrop gives off a mellow vibe :).

    Log in to Reply
  23. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 3:25 pm

    *sticks fingers in ears* Lalalalalalalalala. I'm not listening!

    The good news is that way more than half can just be out and out ignored, probably closer to 3/4. But I do hope there is some winnowing. I wouldn't mind two or three big multi-scent launches if there were less than 100 scents released all year.

    Log in to Reply
  24. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 4:01 pm

    Thanks, I was trying for something soothing and so glad it worked :-)

    Log in to Reply
  25. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 4:14 pm

    I'd be happy if we could even stick to say, 500. I do like having choice. But once you get over 2 a day, the whole thing just becomes a joke, especially with the flankers. I can understand wanting to build on an existing customer base, but when you're launching Dior Addict 2 Summer Peonies — very nearly a flanker of a flanker — you need to stop for a moment and think about how much your customer base can stand before they just stop listening.

    Log in to Reply
  26. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 4:37 pm

    3 book pubs! [ThirdShift explodes into a cloud of stripper glitter out of jealousy.] I barely have time to glance through their booklists. The other day I was looking at the NYT Bookcllub reading list and I despair of ever catching up. Remember those carefree summer days of being a kid and reading MORE than all the other kids and getting extra EXTRA brownie points?

    Log in to Reply
  27. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 4:40 pm

    You have to be selective, R, or you just go crazy!

    I tested a couple of the Etat Libre line…no longer interested! I am not even looking at the new Tom Fords…sensory overload! The releases you mention on your blog…most of the time, I simply read about them and MOVE ON! It's just too much for my little pea-sized brain to absorb.

    Perhaps Victoria is right: The bad/boring lines will weed themselves out thus abating this avalanche of new releases.

    Hugs!

    Log in to Reply
  28. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 5:48 pm

    Etat Libre, I think, released way too many scents way too quickly. Last I looked, 13 in the space of a few months. Give people a chance to get to know your brand and what you're all about before you inundate the market, please! You might have been able to do this even a few years ago, but in today's market, I think it is too much too fast.

    Log in to Reply
  29. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 5:56 pm

    I used to read easily 2-3 books a week, now I barely finish 1 a month. I usually blame it on having a child (and a blog), but sometimes I wonder if it is just another example of overload — too many books coming out, I give up!

    A only tangentially related item: you can actually read a list of every book Art Garfunkel has read for the last 30 years here:

    http://www.artgarfunkel.com/library.html

    It is a fascinating list. He reads a lot, and he makes wise choices.

    Log in to Reply
  30. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 5:57 pm

    Hope you will like at least one of the Chanels, R, I think they are very well done. They seem to be getting a mixed reception at MUA though.

    Log in to Reply
  31. Anonymous says:
    22 February 2007 at 10:13 pm

    I'm getting a little tired too. I cheat some by reading reviews to see what sounds interesting, and I don't bother with the flankers if the original didn't do it for me. But that *still* doesn't eliminate enough. Also the names are getting more difficult to come up with, I guess: did you see the new MDCI names? Maybe I'm putting my foot in it here … but they confused me. (Do I sound dim?) It was like TDC Garden series that I also can't remember the names of.

    Log in to Reply
  32. Anonymous says:
    23 February 2007 at 1:10 am

    From a niche perfumer intimately involved in this subject please let me assure your readers on a couple of issues:

    The perfume is our #1 concern. We sympathise with your concerns over hundreds of bland releases. We loathe them as much as you do.

    Being responsible for finding a retail place for our first perfume takes up the majority of my days. Retailers themselves have become jaded and sceptical about ANY new perfume.

    Expect your readers to have a higher percentage of quality stuff with original characters being released in the future. Consumers are not dummies, they will simply walk away-without making a purchase. Fruity florals simply cannot survive in such numbers and circumstances.

    We are passionate about creating perfumes of beauty. We want the wearer of our perfume to enjoy the experience. Making money is very important to us But I can survive knowing we have done the best to our abilities and hope we are not left with a truck load of unsold stock.

    Log in to Reply
  33. Anonymous says:
    23 February 2007 at 10:33 am

    I did see them M, and have already forgotten them, LOL…

    Log in to Reply
  34. Anonymous says:
    23 February 2007 at 10:35 am

    It is always heartening to hear from someone who cares about perfume, but: “Expect your readers to have a higher percentage of quality stuff with original characters being released in the future.” — hey, I'll believe it when I see it! As near as I can tell, the fact that “Fruity florals simply cannot survive in such numbers and circumstances” does NOTHING to discourage companies from releasing more of them :-)

    Log in to Reply
  35. Anonymous says:
    23 February 2007 at 10:42 am

    So *this* is why he hasn't been making any music since the 70s! :) His Favorites read like req. reading for World Lit. I'm intimidated just looking at the list. and Suskin's “Perfume” is on his list of Fav! OK OK enough of books, I'll stop now.

    Log in to Reply
  36. Anonymous says:
    23 February 2007 at 3:04 pm

    LOL — exactly, he's had his nose buried in a book! Still, it is fascinating. Wish I'd kept a list all these years!

    Log in to Reply
  37. Anonymous says:
    25 February 2007 at 2:23 am

    Maybe I should have elaborated a little. Finding the new perfumes of note will be a difficult task. Surely many will disappear through lack of exposure and poor sales ( that's if they can get shelf space and not just rely on sales through the internet) as was noted by others. But frustration breeds creativity and attempts to create and sell interesting perfumes will be made. Not by too many of the big firms if they are happy with their current sales figures.

    Possibly a contribution to the avalanche of dull perfume releases is reflected in the tastes of the status quo. If consumers don't know (and don't get the chance to experience) the difference between nodescript perfumes and perfumes created with an attempt at making something special then they will go on accepting whats easily available to them.

    How do we help the younger consumer make a confident and informed choice when purchasing perfume? Through workshops, education and experience. Maybe then the tide will begin to change.

    Anyway Robin, great forum, thanks

    Log in to Reply
  38. Anonymous says:
    25 February 2007 at 9:30 am

    I love this rant and agree 100%.

    Log in to Reply
  39. Anonymous says:
    25 February 2007 at 2:27 pm

    Agree with all of that, S, and despite my grumpy rants, I do also think that frustration can breed creativity :-)

    Log in to Reply
  40. Anonymous says:
    25 February 2007 at 2:29 pm

    Thanks :-)

    Log in to Reply
  41. Anonymous says:
    20 November 2007 at 7:39 am

    Demeter and CB:I Hate Perfume also have 'weird' scents, like playdough, glue, and roast beef. LOL. All hail the adventurous perfume tester

    Log in to Reply
  42. Anonymous says:
    20 November 2007 at 8:40 am

    Roast beef is amazing — wouldn't wear it, but it's amazing. Haven't smelled glue or playdoh!

    Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement


Luckyscent

Search

Browse by…

Topic

Perfume talk New fragrances
Shopping Books :: News
Body products Home fragrance
Polls Another subject

Date

December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
Prior months

Author

Robin Jessica
Angela Kevin
Erin Guest Author

Tag

Celebrity perfumes
Cheap thrills
Collector bottles
Perfumista tip series
Video
The complete tag index

From NST at Twitter

  • Headline of the day: "Gwyneth Paltrow’s vagina-scented candle almost burns down home of woman who won it in a quiz" https://t.co/F6bvZtoSXl,
  • "Jo Loves adopts refillable technology for Fragrance Paintbrush" (cosmeticsbusiness) https://t.co/sn2tZ1cguT,

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

TBA April ~ freebiemeet

Back to Top

Home
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy

Shop for Perfume Online
Perfume Shopping in New York
Perfume Shopping in London
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Links
Perfume Books
Fragrance Awards

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2021 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.