• About
  • Login to comment
    • Bluesky
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Archives

Kiehl’s Original Musk Blend No. 1 ~ fragrance review

Posted by Kevin on 16 March 2011 42 Comments

Kiehl's Original Musk Blend No. 1

Kiehl’s (Since 1851) Original Musk Blend No. 1 has been around a long time if you believe Kiehl’s PR: “Our original musk oil is believed to have been created in the 1920s at the ‘Kiehl Apothecary.’ Discovered there in a vat labeled ‘Love Oil’ in the late 50s, Kiehl’s signature scent was reintroduced to our patrons in 1963.” I recently sniffed Original Musk for the first time, and it reminds me of many higher priced perfumes: inside Original Musk there's a pinch of Hermès Eau d’ Hermès with its grainy, leather-cumin accord, a hint of Serge Lutens Muscs Koublaï Khan (“tough” musk with flowers), and a ghostly bit of, believe it or not, Chanel No. 5’s floral aldehydes.

Original Musk is, of course, a synthetic musk fragrance; it has “body” but it’s still a light version of musk — not heavy in the least. Kiehl’s lists Original Musk’s fragrance notes as bergamot nectar, orange blossom, lily, rose, ylang-ylang, neroli, tonka bean, white patchouli and musk.

There are no distinct stages of development in Original Musk…what you smell at first spray is basically what you smell hours later on skin (though the scent softens and becomes a bit more floral in character as it fades away). Original Musk opens with dense citrus and leather-cumin notes followed immediately by the scents of rich flowers (ylang-ylang and an aldehydic rose stand out most forcefully) and a light, modern musk augmented with an amber-y accord of sheer patchouli and tonka bean-vanilla (with a touch of moss?)

Original Musk smells a tad “retro” — overall, it’s a well-rounded “silky” musk fragrance, not a stark musk scent like Malin+Goetz Synthesized Musk. Kiehl’s Original Musk has good lasting power and minimal sillage; it’s one of the few non-fruity musks that I’d wear in warm weather. If you tried Original Musk long ago when it was only available in oil formulation, you may want to revisit it. Robin here at Now Smell This remembers Original Musk as smelling “patch-heavy...or at least heavy” but I don’t find Original Musk particularly patchouli-rich or too strong in Eau de Toilette strength.

At $39 for a 50 ml Eau de Toilette spray, Kiehl's Original Musk qualifies as a “cheap thrill.”

Note: top left image of a musk deer (altered) and top right image of a musk molecule formula via Wikimedia Commons.

Possibly of interest

Chanel 1957 ~ fragrance review
Love Potion Magical Perfumery Love Potion & Honeyed Love Potion ~ fragrance review
Aedes de Venustas Musc Encense ~ fragrance review

Filed Under: perfume talk
Tagged With: cheap thrills, kiehls, musk

Advertisement


42 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. Tiara says:
    16 March 2011 at 11:37 am

    Love cheap thrills. I’ve been trying to share my love of perfume by dragging family and friends into the rabbit hole with me so this will go onto the list of potential gifts. The retro feel is a bonus!

    Log in to Reply
    • Kevin says:
      16 March 2011 at 8:08 pm

      Tiara: yes, a great cheap thrill…I’ll be reviewing many “cheap thrills” this spring

      Log in to Reply
  2. Fuddy Duddy 101 says:
    16 March 2011 at 1:21 pm

    I have always been curious about this fragrance but have never tried it. I love some of their other products, tinted moisturizer, lip balm, etc. So, now you have convinced me it’s worth trying.

    Log in to Reply
    • Kevin says:
      16 March 2011 at 8:09 pm

      FD: I admit I wasn’t expec ting much so was pleasantly surprised

      Log in to Reply
  3. elise says:
    16 March 2011 at 1:24 pm

    yay! I’ve heard so much about this but haven’t tried…and I love cheap thrills! TY for the review!

    Log in to Reply
    • Kevin says:
      16 March 2011 at 8:09 pm

      Elise; you’re welcome

      Log in to Reply
  4. Michelle says:
    16 March 2011 at 2:02 pm

    Kevin, I have owned this for awhile. The bottle drew me in as well as the romantic story of how it was found. Anyway, I love it tremendously…however, the general public does not really embrace smells as heavy as this. I get the old lady comments every time I do but that usually dosen’t stop me. I am also a lover of patchouli and I don’t get any in this one for some reason. Thanks for reviewing..!

    Log in to Reply
    • Kevin says:
      16 March 2011 at 8:11 pm

      Michelle: didn’t get any old lady comments but at this stage all my friends dare not say such a thing to me. HA! I don’t find this one heavy in the least though…wonder if you were using the oil?

      Log in to Reply
  5. ScentScelf says:
    16 March 2011 at 2:02 pm

    Funny, I finally got around to trying this last weekend, while on a smelly bender with a friend in ‘fume. For some reason, I had been under the impression it was one of the “lost” scents…and there it was, on the counter, in real time. Hunh.

    I am generally patch-adverse, though I’ve been known to embrace it in certain perfumes (including all smoothed out in Coromandel), which I use as a preface to say that I, too, thought the Kiehl’s (at least what I found three days ago) to be neither too rich nor to emphatic when it comes to patch.

    Strikes me as a good something to have in the lineup for fans of layering, too.

    Log in to Reply
    • jo says:
      16 March 2011 at 6:53 pm

      what a good idea!!!! i have been longing to try this for forever, and the fact that it is a good ‘layering’ scent sells me on it totally….for some reason i just never thought of that……..

      thanks!

      Log in to Reply
    • Kevin says:
      16 March 2011 at 8:13 pm

      SS: I bet you’re right about layering…I can imaging many things it would go with, including adding interest to certain soliflores.

      Log in to Reply
  6. rosarita says:
    16 March 2011 at 2:20 pm

    I went through a musk phase a couple of yrs ago and Kiehl’s emerged as one of my favorites, a work horse type of scent that I enjoy by itself and layered with all kinds of things. I think of it as an *all purpose* musk scent; not too dirty, floral, harsh, spicy, soft, etc., all things I’ve run into with some other musks. It’s a favorite bedtime scent, too. Thanks for the review!

    Log in to Reply
    • Kevin says:
      16 March 2011 at 8:14 pm

      Rosarita: I can see it being a “just-right” musk…you’re welcome

      Log in to Reply
  7. xxx.o says:
    16 March 2011 at 2:34 pm

    I tried this on recently and really liked it. I’d sum it up as earthy and amber-y with a pretty floral base that’s fresh like dewy-wet petals. It didn’t have the heavy carnal muskiness that I expected.

    As a guy, I thought it was slightly too floral for my taste. But I did end up getting the Khiel’s Pour Homme. Both are very nice, pleasant, and easy to wear, but I wouldn’t say that either smells exotic or expensive.

    Log in to Reply
    • Kevin says:
      16 March 2011 at 8:17 pm

      xxx.o: agree that it does not smell exotic … I can’t think of any exotic-smelling Kiehl’s scent…but it smells as expensive as most mainstreams/department store fragrances I’ve been drowning in recently.

      Log in to Reply
  8. Tama says:
    16 March 2011 at 2:47 pm

    I’ll have to give this a go. I have been mad a Keihl’s ever since they discontinued Exquisite Rain (it’s not like I don’t have some of it, it was just the idea) and they are also not as nature-based and whatnot as they come across, but I know this is a rather iconic scent. Musk and I are not getting along well right now (think I might have some anosmia) but now and then I get it.

    Log in to Reply
    • Kevin says:
      16 March 2011 at 8:18 pm

      Tama; a few people I let smell this came up “empty nosed” (couldn’t smell a thing)…so you are not alone

      Log in to Reply
  9. maggiecat says:
    16 March 2011 at 4:03 pm

    Friends have been raving about some of Kiehls skins care products, so perhaps the next time they drag me over to the counter, I’ll have something to do…

    Log in to Reply
    • jo says:
      16 March 2011 at 6:55 pm

      i tried the musk body wash, and, frankly, i get almost nothing out of it. however, based on this review, i will be buying the scent itself to try it out anyway.

      Log in to Reply
      • Kevin says:
        16 March 2011 at 8:20 pm

        Jo: ah, if you can’t smell the body wash in Musk this might be a “wash” too…see above. (you may not be able to smell this particular musk)

        Log in to Reply
    • Kevin says:
      16 March 2011 at 8:19 pm

      Maggie: I need to revisit some of the Kiehl’s products too…used to love the skin lotions and body washes

      Log in to Reply
  10. Occhineri says:
    16 March 2011 at 4:16 pm

    I tried this last week because I couldn’t remember what it smelled like and was surprised to discover that it smelled like the Egyptian musks sold at my local health food store. I didn’t get any patch at all either.

    Log in to Reply
  11. Queen_Cupcake says:
    16 March 2011 at 5:17 pm

    Thanks for your review, and I really appreciate your description of the development of this scent. For some reason, I was thinking it was a one-note frag… Must try soon! Now if only I can keep a straight face when I see all those SAs in their clean white coats…

    Log in to Reply
    • Kevin says:
      16 March 2011 at 8:23 pm

      Queen C: Oh, no…didn’t notice any lab coats!

      Log in to Reply
  12. kaos.geo says:
    16 March 2011 at 5:42 pm

    It is one of my “10 Full Bottles” lovely to wear alone, or to layer under many fragrances to give them a nice musk-base.

    Definitely a cheap thrill.

    Log in to Reply
    • Daisy says:
      16 March 2011 at 8:12 pm

      and I know you select your FBs carefully….ahg, I’m being enabled here!

      Log in to Reply
      • kaos.geo says:
        16 March 2011 at 9:46 pm

        Self enabling is the worst! 😉

        Log in to Reply
        • Daisy says:
          16 March 2011 at 10:24 pm

          and yet I engage in self-enabling constantly!

          Log in to Reply
  13. eminere says:
    16 March 2011 at 6:23 pm

    “Love Oil”. I wonder if the shop assistants of the 20s could’ve introduced it to customers as such while keeping a straight face.

    Log in to Reply
    • Kevin says:
      16 March 2011 at 8:23 pm

      Eminere: really…that sounds “made up” to me…but I could be wrong.

      Log in to Reply
  14. alotofscents says:
    16 March 2011 at 6:29 pm

    LOL. I was thinking the same thing. It sounds as if I’d like it, if it isn’t too head shop-y.

    Log in to Reply
  15. Daisy says:
    16 March 2011 at 8:07 pm

    hmmm…. I’ve ignored this for the longest time….too heavy, too oily, too head shop patchy….at least that was my “impression” ….now I’m going to need to try a bit.

    Log in to Reply
    • Daisy says:
      16 March 2011 at 8:11 pm

      I meant to say also — I’ve learned to take your recommendations with a certain amount of trepidation Kevin—your tolerance for musky, patchy, animalic scents far far FAR exceeds mine….what can I say? I’m a bona-fide perfume pansy. (that’s code for chicken-shit)

      Log in to Reply
      • Kevin says:
        16 March 2011 at 8:25 pm

        Daisy: haha! I THINK I can say, THIS time, that this is MILD compared to other dirty/musky/earthy things I love…so it might not horrify you!

        Log in to Reply
        • Daisy says:
          16 March 2011 at 8:29 pm

          well, I’d hate to be horrified. …you know, as a general rule.

          On the perfume dirty/musky/earthy things-o-meter : at one end there’s a picture of Kevin….and wayyyyy at the other end is a picture of Daisy…..

          Log in to Reply
          • Daisy says:
            16 March 2011 at 10:23 pm

            oh I almost forgot —a siren goes off when the earthy-ometer is pointed at a bottle of MKK and my picture turns a little green….

  16. Winifrieda says:
    16 March 2011 at 8:12 pm

    Yes! This really ‘put a floor’ in my ability to judge all the modern musks out there; it really struck me as a clean version of MKK, which I just cannot do. Mind you I often wonder if I can smell all ‘musk’ aromachems, some musk ‘fumes are just so meh to me I cannot understand the lurve (I get goat hair form MKK by and large!!!); I know I can smell the real stuff; after putting aside my aversion to slaughtering those little deer, I got a droplet just to make sure…and during my quest to understand musk, I came across info somewhere that the old Mughals/sultans/kings would have musk parks where servants actually picked up the pellets from the ground instead of killing the deer.

    Log in to Reply
    • Kevin says:
      16 March 2011 at 8:26 pm

      Winifrieda: thankfully we can rest assured no sweet little deer were harmed for this!

      Log in to Reply
  17. nozknoz says:
    16 March 2011 at 10:13 pm

    I’ve been wondering about this one – good to know it’s not just in oil form any more. I appreciate your reviewing a classic, Kevin, and am delighted to hear that more cheap thrills are on the way!

    Log in to Reply
    • Kevin says:
      17 March 2011 at 9:20 pm

      Noz: cheapies have been thrilling me more than mainstreams lately…and niche stuff too! Hope spring brings in some good things in all categories…all I’m doing now is replacing old favorites

      Log in to Reply
  18. DoryCubana says:
    17 March 2011 at 5:36 am

    dear Kevin, would you (or someone else at NST) review other frags they offer? I’ve read they were re-done lika a couple of years ago and years of their initial issue added to theri names.

    Log in to Reply
  19. guerlaingirl says:
    19 March 2011 at 9:44 pm

    Kevin, thanks for your review. I have this in a perfume oil roll-on, and it’s my go-to comfort scent to wear to bed. I find it very soothing and warm. I’m trying to remember how I’ve layered it, but really, when I want it, I want it by itself. 🙂

    Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

15 March ~ swapmeet

3 April ~ damage poll
26 April ~ splitmeet

3 May ~ spring reading poll
17 May ~ Haiku challenge!

 

Back to Top

Home
Archives
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Books

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2025 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.