• About
  • Login to comment
    • Facebook
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Perfumers
  • Perfume Houses
  • Shop for perfume
  • Resources

Where the money goes

Posted by Robin on 10 March 2009 24 Comments

When a perfume does succeed, the profits are formidable all around. The laboratory sells the juice to the licensee at two and a half times the cost. The licensee sells it at retail for two to four times its cost and earns about 30 to 40 percent in profits. The licensee then pays the luxury brand royalties for use of the name.

— From Deluxe: How Luxury Lost Its Luster by Dana Thomas (p. 163).

Filed Under: perfume in the news
Tagged With: luxury

Advertisement


24 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. Anonymous says:
    10 March 2009 at 12:30 pm

    I'm not sure I understand who the licensee would be here..and how they would be a different entity than the luxury brand? Can you give me an example?

    Log in to Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    10 March 2009 at 12:43 pm

    Most designer & celebrity brands license their name to someone else. Coty, for instance, holds the license for Calvin Klein fragrances. When “Calvin Klein” makes a fragrance, one of the big fragrance & flavor (IFF, Givaudan, Firmenich, etc) companies makes the scent itself (“the juice”), sells it to Coty, and Coty pays $ to Calvin Klein for use of the name.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Anonymous says:
    10 March 2009 at 12:57 pm

    Like any mass-market release, the hits pay for the flops.

    I really enjoyed the first two-thirds of that book. The last third irritated and depressed me in equal measures.

    Log in to Reply
  4. Anonymous says:
    10 March 2009 at 12:58 pm

    Does this mean you're reading Deluxe? Mini-review please! (And thanks monkeytoes, for yours.)

    Log in to Reply
  5. Anonymous says:
    10 March 2009 at 1:06 pm

    Thank you muchly for the explanation re: the licensee, etc because I had the same question. You answered it very nicely and now I feel like I actually know something today! Thanks.

    Log in to Reply
  6. Anonymous says:
    10 March 2009 at 1:24 pm

    I skimmed the opening, skimmed bits of other sections, read the perfume chapter, read the closing chapter. Almost everything I read irritated me, although if you don't know much about how luxury conglomerates work, it will be an eye opener. Anyone who has read either of the Chandler Burr books, however, won't learn much about the perfume industry from Deluxe.

    Unlike Dana Thomas, I do not bemoan the lost world of luxury; the fact that designer clothing is now sold on racks in stores that anybody can enter, instead of in a salon and only to an elite few, does not make me weep. Her description of the luxury store in Brazil, Daslu, which she obviously thought wonderful, I found vaguely repellent. I like nice things, but I have a kind of puritanical streak, I suppose, and most of what she calls “real luxury” I find distasteful and ostentatious.

    Log in to Reply
  7. Anonymous says:
    10 March 2009 at 1:25 pm

    See above for my usual cranky opinion 🙂

    Log in to Reply
  8. Anonymous says:
    10 March 2009 at 1:26 pm

    If you want a basic introduction to how it all works, you could read Newman's Perfume or Burr's The Perfect Scent. Links to both can be found here:

    https://nstperfume.com/blog/_WebPages/PerfumeBooks.html

    Log in to Reply
  9. Anonymous says:
    10 March 2009 at 1:35 pm

    Daslu IS repellent, especially in a country like Brazil.

    Log in to Reply
  10. Anonymous says:
    10 March 2009 at 2:08 pm

    I especially loved the socialite who she quotes as saying “luxury is not what you can buy, it's knowing what is the right thing to buy” (not quoting directly but from memory) and then it turns out that means that yes, you do buy Louis Vuitton, you're just not so crass as to buy the “entry level” Louis Vuitton crap that everybody else can buy. Oh, thanks.

    Log in to Reply
  11. Anonymous says:
    10 March 2009 at 4:28 pm

    What a racket. It's tough being a peon. hahaha

    Log in to Reply
  12. Anonymous says:
    10 March 2009 at 4:39 pm

    LOL…so very true.

    Log in to Reply
  13. Anonymous says:
    10 March 2009 at 4:43 pm

    I'm so glad you said that! Someone posted a rapturous mention of the book on MUA, and I read an excerpt online, which I found repulsive and anti-democratic. I said so, and she made some comment in reply about my *obviously* less than deluxe financial means~LOL!

    I find the whole notion of nineteenth-century-style luxury glamourized in the book repellant–as in, obscene luxury for a few is built on obscene poverty for many!

    Log in to Reply
  14. Anonymous says:
    10 March 2009 at 4:46 pm

    Jeez, really! I guess I'm not in the know then! But somehow, I don't feel too deprived…… 🙂

    Log in to Reply
  15. Anonymous says:
    10 March 2009 at 4:54 pm

    I'm with you: I read it as a Fast Food Nation with an unreliable and snobby narrator. I don't bemoan the loss of exclusivity, though I do a bit bemoan the loss of craftsmanship. If knockoffs are as “well-made” what is the point of originals (in terms of “quality”).

    Log in to Reply
  16. Anonymous says:
    10 March 2009 at 5:01 pm

    I keep reading ABOUT this book in various places, but I have yet to read the book itself, and it already sounds too irritating to pay for! I'm always curious about how much packaging adds to the cost of perfume; does it mention anything about that?

    Log in to Reply
  17. Anonymous says:
    10 March 2009 at 5:07 pm

    I think some of the declining quality issues are also a result of changing attitudes towards possessions–nothing's meant to last for 10 years anymore! And everything is so oriented towards trendiness–I can't imagine anyone carrying a ten-year old bag anymore because of the overwhelming faddishness of most styles; jewelry yes, but clothes and bags, no.

    Log in to Reply
  18. Anonymous says:
    10 March 2009 at 5:08 pm

    In fairness to Dana Thomas, I should point out that I did not read the entire book, and she does emphasize that the modern “soulless” luxury product is usually made by poorly paid workers in the 3rd world. But the line that sticks with me is again from the end, where she is interviewing the same socialite I mentioned above in Brazil, who points out that when her driver was sick she paid for his treatment.

    Log in to Reply
  19. Anonymous says:
    10 March 2009 at 5:16 pm

    Monkeytoe, I don't know. I very quickly skimmed the part where she talks about the incredible care taken in the making of Hermes bags. What can I say, I'm not a Hermes bag kind of person — I mostly rolled my eyes. Counterfeiting is interesting to me mostly because I find it fascinating that you can get so many people to buy into the idea that the LV logo on a bag is worth paying *anything* for, much less big $$.

    Log in to Reply
  20. Anonymous says:
    10 March 2009 at 5:23 pm

    I got it from the library, so it cost me nothing but a few eye rolls.

    She says that packaging is usually about 10% of production cost for a luxury perfume (if she ever defines what a luxury perfume is, I missed it though), and is one of the first place companies start to cut back — in other words, they might have nice packaging at first, then they'll make subtle changes to save $ over time.

    Log in to Reply
  21. Anonymous says:
    10 March 2009 at 10:30 pm

    Interesting… thank you!

    Log in to Reply
  22. Anonymous says:
    11 March 2009 at 5:21 am

    It is not a meaning of luxury, it is a meaning of taste – I do wear the same bag for 5 years and will wear it the next ten, and then buy the same, if it is broken.

    Things that never been in fashion will never go out of style – it is the classic Longchamp bag in small, but in classic black leather. Was not expensive, it is very nice and classy enough and suits me perfect. I bought it because I love it and it is timeless.

    Luxury is the symbolic meaning of an object – perfume is luxury because it serves only our pleasure.

    Yet many products have only the symblic stuff left, like labels who used to sell quality and sell crap instead, but still for a lot of money.

    In Europe this thinking is changing and people embrace sustainibility, some because it is a trend, some beacuse they missthis craftmanship.

    I know people living in cheap apartments and wearing hand-made shoes.

    Log in to Reply
  23. Anonymous says:
    12 March 2009 at 7:45 pm

    Just getting around to this comment thread. LOL at “cost nothing but a few eye rolls.” This definitely does NOT sound like my kind of book. I have a bit of an academic interest in all that, but in general it makes me roll my eyes and then get sort of [semi-socialistically] angry. However, along the same lines, that other book, “Bringing Home the Birkin” sounded kind of fun.

    It's so out of character for me to pay $50 for a little vial of perfumed liquid, but as a former boss said, “At some point, you realize everyone is a hypocrite to some degree.” I'm incredulous at my own behavior sometimes, but… we all have our vices as they say. I also got to a point where I realized I could never be “reponsible” enough unless I wore a hairshirt and tended to lepers like Mother Teresa herself, so I might as well let go of some issues and enjoy my life…

    Back to the topic, the whole industry and the “value added” economics/accounting of it is interesting when you realize in no uncertain terms that what we're paying for in the little Hermes bottle is NOT the juice and some “rare” raw materials. Even though I'm a beneficiary (as a consumer and otherwise), it's quite sad, really, what some retail empires are built on in the modern corporate age.

    Log in to Reply
  24. Anonymous says:
    12 March 2009 at 8:17 pm

    Joe, I think the biggest myth is that you're getting more quality for your money out of a more expensive perfume…I think nothing could be farther from the truth…there's a good chance you're actually paying an even higher premium for a name, or sometimes, for the idea that you're buying something “exclusive”. Hermes, at least, is putting out interesting perfumes, but some of the “luxury” launches really astound me.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

Browse by...

Topic

Perfume talk New fragrances
Shopping Books :: News
Body products Home fragrance
Polls Another subject

Date

August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023

Prior months

Author

Robin Jessica
Angela Kevin
Erin Guest Author

Tag

Celebrity perfumes
Cheap thrills
Collector bottles
Perfumista tip series
Video
The complete tag index

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

23 September ~ swapmeet

3 October ~ damage poll
7 October ~ fall reading poll
21 October ~ splitmeet

Back to Top

Home
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Links
Perfume Books

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2023 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.