• About
  • Login to comment
    • Facebook
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Perfumers
  • Perfume Houses
  • Shop for perfume
  • Resources

The scent of fear, part two

Posted by Robin on 25 April 2008 24 Comments

"Headspace" (a term borrowed from the beat generation, where it connoted psychological privacy) is the technical term for the area surrounding an object or person in which their odour can be analysed. But odour detection is not limited to the discovery of drugs and explosives. Scientists and electronic nose entrepreneurs claim headspace analysis can reveal everything from the substances people have been in contact with and their emotional state, to their personal identity and ethnic origin. Although the science behind this field is nascent and the scientific validity of such claims is hotly disputed, they are gaining in stature. Researchers believe the unique smell that we each emit is tied to the makeup of the major histocompatibility complex, a group of genes found on the surface of T-cells that are crucial to the immune system. Several police dog handlers attribute their dogs' knack for identifying criminals to an ability to detect the scent of fear emitted by the guilty, and a synthesised version of this scent is available as a training aid.

— From Smells suspicious, a fascinating report on modern methods of olfactory surveillance. By columnist Amber Marks in the UK Guardian, with thanks to Gary Fredrick for the link.

Filed Under: perfume in the news
Tagged With: electronic nose, headspace, olfaction

Advertisement


24 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. Anonymous says:
    25 April 2008 at 9:17 am

    So…if they've already synthesized fear, could they do joy next? I've already got enough ennui…but I would love some ecstatic happiness. This is interesting, this sensory detection. Now, if our auras could be easily seen, and our emotional state scented … absolutely what psychological privacy would be left? We'd be forced into absolute honesty. Feels kind of naked and vulnerable to me. xoxo

    Log in to Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    25 April 2008 at 9:28 am

    “the scent of fear emitted by the guilty”?! Perhaps they are just afraid of dogs.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Anonymous says:
    25 April 2008 at 9:46 am

    Perhaps ecstatic happiness would get you arrested even faster in an airport, no? Privacy is disappearing fast.

    Log in to Reply
  4. Anonymous says:
    25 April 2008 at 9:55 am

    Or perhaps they're scared of modern methods of olfactory surveillance :-(

    Log in to Reply
  5. Anonymous says:
    25 April 2008 at 10:01 am

    This is something we all should be very worried about…

    This is extremely invasive science and when used by the wrong governent, in the long run we all could end up living in a totalitary society.

    Hope there will be firm rules to manage this kind of science and technology.

    Log in to Reply
  6. Anonymous says:
    25 April 2008 at 11:02 am

    What a marvelous, spooky article. I remember reading a development study by the Economist or something that indicated you could partially measure the “development level” of a country by how much its citizens trusted the police. My husband and I were shocked. Based on our experiences as a couple, if they surveyed us, Canada would surely be a “Third World” country. Of course, if somebody burglarized our house, I would call the police (I don't think they're corrupt, exactly), but I wouldn't expect anything to come of their investigation. And I wouldn't call them if I had a missing piece of fruitcake, that's for sure!?!

    The smelling of race or ethnic background is particularly offensive to me, as well as keeping banks of the smells of political activists. And I had no idea that the McCanns had become suspects based on sniffer dog information – I thought there was supposed to have blood in a car they had rented?

    Log in to Reply
  7. Anonymous says:
    25 April 2008 at 11:48 am

    When those bees won't leave us alone it's not going to be just the bees bothering us. All of a sudden you wonder. Are these bees picking the wrong person because I smell like a person who just robbed a bank.

    The worst part was the homeless guy who gets convicted for stealing cake because the dog gave a positive reaction. The dogs I knew, way back when, who I trained for obedience just wanted a reward. If you were in the way well… All in a dogs days business.

    Damn the biggest wasp I've ever seen is stuck to the screen…

    Log in to Reply
  8. Anonymous says:
    25 April 2008 at 12:04 pm

    This is really very bad news… and I haven't seen or heard a dog in weeks in Prague… kind of makes me wonder… Those Czechs aren't so stupid after all..

    Log in to Reply
  9. Anonymous says:
    25 April 2008 at 12:07 pm

    Very disturbing.

    Log in to Reply
  10. Anonymous says:
    25 April 2008 at 12:58 pm

    Agreed.

    Log in to Reply
  11. Anonymous says:
    25 April 2008 at 1:00 pm

    Yep.

    Log in to Reply
  12. Anonymous says:
    25 April 2008 at 1:01 pm

    Interesting about the development level — because I think this article illustrates that perhaps you'd find the highest level of trust at some middle level of development, you know? But once you get too developed, it's all down hill.

    Have not been following the McCann story at all, on purpose, so I don't know.

    Log in to Reply
  13. Anonymous says:
    25 April 2008 at 1:21 pm

    Gary Fred, the fruitcake story is truly shocking…and that it held up on appeal.

    Log in to Reply
  14. Anonymous says:
    25 April 2008 at 2:42 pm

    Bad in so many ways. Aside from the privacy issues, it's such an inexact thing.

    Dogs are better at smelling than us, but they're not perfect. If courts are letting prosecutions suceed that hinge on smell, that's a whole set of miscarriages of justice waiting to happen.

    What struck me in the article me was the laid back attitude about using dogs to justify stop and search. Evidently the British police haven't learnt from their own past (riot inspiring) failures.

    Log in to Reply
  15. Anonymous says:
    25 April 2008 at 7:46 pm

    I am thinking the fruitcake guy did not have a top notch lawyer :-(

    Log in to Reply
  16. Anonymous says:
    25 April 2008 at 8:04 pm

    Wow, creepy article. Hard to believe they would research surveillance/criminal prosecution on something so ephemeral.

    Having said that, I do think some dogs have an uncanny ability to pick up on when someone is up to no good. Whether it's scent or something else, I'm not sure. Certainly not grounds for prosecuting someone though!

    Log in to Reply
  17. Anonymous says:
    26 April 2008 at 10:12 am

    probably assigned to him from the public defenders office who is doing 20 or 30 cases a day. Plus the homeless have been demonized like nothing I've ever seen in this country.

    Weren't most Biblical Prophets homeless? Christ and his Apostles for instance?

    Log in to Reply
  18. Anonymous says:
    26 April 2008 at 10:17 am

    Dogs are incredibly uncanny even to the point of picking up their handlers body language when instructed multiple times to do something because his owner doesn't want to spend his day looking for a piece of cake.

    In fact “a piece of cake” may be the instuction this team operated with to indicate, 'c'mon, next case'.

    Log in to Reply
  19. Anonymous says:
    26 April 2008 at 10:22 am

    I wonder what our forefathers would think upon finding out that refusing a search without a warrant brings out the “probable cause” flag and is practically one strike against you in court.

    I knew something smelled fishy about him your honor so we searched him, his car, his family and all their belongings and found _______.

    I think I'm reading to many books that defend the constitution, which was written by brilliant well educated men.

    Log in to Reply
  20. Anonymous says:
    26 April 2008 at 3:01 pm

    Cheezwiz, it is true…I can't imagine many police stations in the US would follow up on a stolen slice of fruitcake.

    Log in to Reply
  21. Anonymous says:
    26 April 2008 at 3:01 pm

    True.

    Log in to Reply
  22. Anonymous says:
    27 April 2008 at 12:47 am

    I was wondering if they took into account factors like what a person had eaten when deciding that a particular ethnicity smelt a certain way. I have noticed that my personal odour changes if I eat curry or garlic or other spicy foods and perfumes react differently on my skin. Surely this would alter a person's odour. Would my “ethnicity” change with whatever country's cuisine I had eaten that day? I think that there are way too many factors that affect our odour for this to have any real value as a mode of detection.

    Log in to Reply
  23. Anonymous says:
    27 April 2008 at 12:24 pm

    I do not know enough about the technology to comment, but certainly agree that foods affect the smell of skin, and by extension, the smell of perfumes.

    Log in to Reply
  24. Anonymous says:
    27 April 2008 at 12:43 pm

    I know that it is all heresay but I've even heard or read somewhere that vegetarians and meat eaters smell different.

    So what we eat probably affects our body odour as well.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

From NST at Twitter

    Browse by...

    Topic

    Perfume talk New fragrances
    Shopping Books :: News
    Body products Home fragrance
    Polls Another subject

    Date

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022

    Prior months

    Author

    Robin Jessica
    Angela Kevin
    Erin Guest Author

    Tag

    Celebrity perfumes
    Cheap thrills
    Collector bottles
    Perfumista tip series
    Video
    The complete tag index

    Recent reviews

    Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
    Moschino Toy Boy
    Arquiste Misfit
    Diptyque Eau Capitale
    Zoologist Bee
    Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
    Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
    Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
    L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
    Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
    Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
    Chanel 1957
    Gallivant Los Angeles
    Amouage Portrayal Woman

    Blogroll

    Bois de Jasmin
    Grain de Musc
    Perfume Posse
    The Non-Blonde
    More blogs...

    Perfumista lists

    100 fragrances every perfumista should try
    And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
    50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
    26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
    25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
    11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

    Favorite posts

    The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
    Why I Love Old School Chypres
    New to perfume and want to learn more?
    How to make fragrance last through the day
    Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
    On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
    How to get fragrance samples
    Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

    Upcoming

    List of upcoming Friday projects

    20 May ~ Haiku Challenge
    20 May ~ splitmeet

    Back to Top

    Home
    About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy

    Shop for Perfume Online
    Perfume Shopping in New York
    Perfume Shopping in London
    Perfume Reviews
    New Perfumes
    General Perfume Articles
    The Monday Mail

    Glossary of Perfume Terms
    Perfume FAQ
    Perfume Links
    Perfume Books
    Fragrance Awards

    Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

    Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
    H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
    T :: U-Z

    Copyright © 2005-2023 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.