• About
  • Login to comment
    • Facebook
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Perfumers
  • Perfume Houses
  • Shop for perfume
  • Resources

And all this science I don’t understand…

Posted by Robin on 8 March 2008 14 Comments

A Nobel laureate and her co-authors on a 2001 paper on the sense of smell have retracted the study, saying they had discovered problems in the data and were unable to duplicate their findings.

Linda Buck shared the 2004 Nobel Prize in medicine for her work on smell. It was not immediately clear how important the retracted research, done in mice, was to the body of work that led to her Nobel.

— Read more at Nobel laureate recants key paper on smell, at SFGate. Thanks to Clare for the link!

Filed Under: perfume in the news
Tagged With: olfaction

Advertisement


14 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. Anonymous says:
    8 March 2008 at 11:22 am

    Well, certainly I don't understand this any better than you, Robin, and as the post says, it's not clear how this is going to affect the body of work that lead to the Nobel. But I think it's interesting: Linda Buck was a proponent (sometimes! – she wouldn't admit to it, occasionally) of “Weak Shape” smell thoery when the “Emperor of Scent” was published. She doesn't come off at all well in the book, dismissing Turin's vibrational theory without reading anything about it. At least this part of the book comforted me that this side of academic life is not confined to the Humanities department…

    Log in to Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    8 March 2008 at 12:32 pm

    Wow. Thanks for this news. Now we wait for the other shoe to drop?

    Log in to Reply
  3. Anonymous says:
    8 March 2008 at 1:03 pm

    You know, my interest in the science of smell & the shape vs. vibration theories is, well, minimal at best. I don't really know a darned thing about LB, just dutifully reporting the news, LOL…

    On the “this side of academic life”, however, yes, it is pervasive. At one time I hoped to finish my Ph.d. and teach, and while I sometimes regret not finishing my degree, I've never regretted the decision not to spend my life in academia.

    Log in to Reply
  4. Anonymous says:
    8 March 2008 at 1:04 pm

    I'm not waiting for anything :-)

    Log in to Reply
  5. Anonymous says:
    8 March 2008 at 8:16 pm

    What a bummer to realize that the basis of your Nobel is wrong! I'd be upset. I'm getting annoyed with myself for not remembering what song your post title came from.

    Log in to Reply
  6. Anonymous says:
    8 March 2008 at 8:45 pm

    Does this help —

    It's just my job five days a week…

    Log in to Reply
  7. Anonymous says:
    8 March 2008 at 9:50 pm

    Nope, guess I'll have to google it.

    Oh… I should have known that one.

    Log in to Reply
  8. Anonymous says:
    8 March 2008 at 9:56 pm

    Rocket Man, Elton John!

    Log in to Reply
  9. Anonymous says:
    8 March 2008 at 10:12 pm

    Yeah. I felt so silly when I saw it.

    Log in to Reply
  10. Anonymous says:
    9 March 2008 at 9:09 am

    This retraction does not change one iota to the the fact that Linda Buck discovered olfactory receptors and changed this field of science forever. It is primarily for this great discovery that she got the Nobel Prize with Richard Axel. As the facts stand today, she was taken in by a collaborator who made up data. It could happen to any scientist and it is a great shame that it happened to her. She courageously did the right thing and went public when doubts emerged. None of this has any bearing on vibrational vs shape theories of smell.

    Log in to Reply
  11. Anonymous says:
    9 March 2008 at 9:12 am

    Woops.

    Log in to Reply
  12. Anonymous says:
    9 March 2008 at 11:20 am

    Thanks for clarifying! That's what it sounded like in the article, and while it didn't say what she got the Nobel for, I assumed it was for discovering olfactory receptors – should have looked it up obviously. I also should have clarified that the book described her as a giant in the field, and that you didn't dispute what she had found. It was just that particular bit that stood out in book! ;)

    Log in to Reply
  13. Anonymous says:
    9 March 2008 at 11:52 am

    Okay, I guess it *does* say down at the bottom there what she got it for! Oops! But why does it say “key paper” if it's not clear whether it's key or not? Sensationalist reporting, I guess.

    Log in to Reply
  14. Anonymous says:
    9 March 2008 at 5:08 pm

    Adding another “thanks for clarifying”.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

From NST at Twitter

  • "Houston's corpse flower to bloom any day" (axios houston) https://t.co/cd3HQwRNT1, 17 hours ago
  • "Composition Of Roman Perfume Identified For First Time, And It Smelled Like Patchouli" (iflscience) https://t.co/RIQd8yYiIN, 17 hours ago
  • "Meet the fragrances celebrities actually wear" (harpers bazaar) https://t.co/4l6j3tnc0T,
  • "9th Art and Olfaction Awards: Meet the Winners" https://t.co/NwvjC07T1O,
  • "The Surprising Spot Screen Legend Ann-Margret Puts Her New Fragrance" (people) https://t.co/GzuVkM0Y1l,

Browse by...

Topic

Perfume talk New fragrances
Shopping Books :: News
Body products Home fragrance
Polls Another subject

Date

March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022

Prior months

Author

Robin Jessica
Angela Kevin
Erin Guest Author

Tag

Celebrity perfumes
Cheap thrills
Collector bottles
Perfumista tip series
Video
The complete tag index

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

20 May ~ Haiku Challenge
20 May ~ splitmeet

Back to Top

Home
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy

Shop for Perfume Online
Perfume Shopping in New York
Perfume Shopping in London
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Links
Perfume Books
Fragrance Awards

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2023 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.