• About
  • Login to comment
    • Bluesky
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Archives

Gucci Pour Homme fragrance review

Posted by Kevin on 2 April 2007 28 Comments

Gucci Pour Homme fragrance

Mainstream men’s colognes — a wearying bunch of scents that more often than not smell of “cold” citrus (harsh, metallic, faux citrus) floating on a sea of “marine” notes or buffeted by ozonic winds. This type of fragrance (apparently beloved by market research guinea pigs) rules the mainstream male perfume world and no matter how many interesting ingredients are mentioned in ad copy — May rose, myrrh, olive wood, hay, nasturtium, etc. — chances are, when you sniff a new men’s fragrance, you will detect only citrus, ozone or marine notes, a touch of wood, and a squirt of tepid musk. Boring, boring, boring.

When Gucci released Pour Homme in 2003, I was relieved to read its list of notes: white pepper, pink bay, ginger, papyrus wood, orris rhizome, vetiver, amber, white olibanum and leather — no citrus, no evocations of the shore or high altitudes!

Gucci Pour Homme opens with a spicy, and short-lived, burst of pepper and ginger. This spiciness merges immediately with a dry, woody-cedar aroma. (If you do not like the smell of cedar wood, I doubt you’ll appreciate Pour Homme.) The wood accord (“papyrus wood”) continues thru the development of the scent and is joined by sweet vanilla-amber and hints of leather and frankincense.

Pour Homme is so well blended that there is little variation in the scent over the course of a day, and individual notes are not readily apparent. The scent of Pour Homme reminds me of several Japanese traditional incense blends I use: simple combinations of woods and subtle spices. Pour Homme is a tranquil, “dignified”, woody and wintry scent and, though not ground breaking, does not fit neatly into the mainstream men’s cologne mold.

Gucci Pour Homme is a good “mixer” — it layers well with leather, black tea, incense and even fruit (especially peach/apricot) scents. Pour Homme has good lasting power and its fragrance stays close to the body. It comes in a handsome and heavy glass bottle with a snap-on metal top and a base of textured glass that resembles wire mesh. Pour Homme was developed by perfumer Michel Almairac, and if you shop carefully, you can find the 50 ml Eau de Toilette online for around $25.

Tomorrow: a review of the new Gucci Pour Homme II.

Possibly of interest

Commodity Book ~ fragrance review
Gucci Guilty Absolute Pour Homme ~ fragrance review
Loewe 001 Woman ~ fragrance review

Filed Under: perfume talk
Tagged With: cheap thrills, gucci, michel almairac, wood

Advertisement


28 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. Anonymous says:
    2 April 2007 at 11:50 am

    I love this one. It was apparently create to evoke the overly virile, covered in stubble, Indiana-Jones-feel fragrances of the seventies. There is something kind of campy about it for me, and I never really get why people complain that it's too sweet. I can tolerate sweetness if it is accompanied by the dryness you get here.

    Log in to Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    2 April 2007 at 11:57 am

    Uggh…this was somewhat of a disaster. Just too cedary/pencil-shavy. Its embarrassingly bad compared to the original Gucci pour homme (1978), which is perhaps the best Gucci scent for men.

    I am more looking forward to Gucci homme II (it contains a tea note).

    Log in to Reply
  3. Anonymous says:
    2 April 2007 at 12:11 pm

    It is a very interesting fragrance that develops its incense theme wonderfully. In general, I find Almairac's work inspiring (save for his creations for Bond no 9), and Gucci pour Homme is among my favourites.

    Log in to Reply
  4. Anonymous says:
    2 April 2007 at 12:14 pm

    Have to butt in to say I love this stuff, and sorry I never bothered to try it until they launched Pour Homme 2. Agree with Tigs that there is something sort of campy about it — in that sense it reminds me of another Tom Ford-engineered scent for men, M7.
    Would love to try it next to Tumulte Homme, but can't find my dratted sample. If memory serves, that one is even more cedary/pencil shavings than this.

    Log in to Reply
  5. Anonymous says:
    2 April 2007 at 12:20 pm

    I agree…the sweet and the dry notes are well blended here. (But the model in the ad is CERTAINLY not a be-stubbled Indiana Jones type.) K

    Log in to Reply
  6. Anonymous says:
    2 April 2007 at 12:22 pm

    We here at NST are lovers of pencil shavings! I never tried

    the 1978 Gucci pour homme unfortunately. I'll remain mum on the Gucci Pour Homme II till tomorrow…K

    Log in to Reply
  7. Anonymous says:
    2 April 2007 at 12:27 pm

    No, I noticed that – the ad kind of threw me when I saw it here today for the first time. Very much looking forward to your review tomorrow. I haven't tried the new one, but am interested in tea notes lately and the bottle looks so neat (not usually a concern of mine!)

    And R, I agree about M7. Love that one, too.

    Log in to Reply
  8. Anonymous says:
    2 April 2007 at 12:28 pm

    Thanks for carping about the sad state of the men's fragrance market, K, I feel so much more relieved to know I'm not alone. There's only so much of metallic citrus I can stomach – I'd sooner douse myself in Tide! The latest Davidoff spinoff of Silver Shadow, Altitude *rolls eyes* and various summer flankers, they all smell like pesticides.

    Gucci, however… Yum (waves to Erin), but then I love cedar and incense and don't mind smelling like pencil shavings. It really is a dry, skin scent with a lovely ambery warmth and I found that it layers beautifully with Rochas Lui. Which scents do you layer it with, K? I might try that w/ Chergui…

    Log in to Reply
  9. Anonymous says:
    2 April 2007 at 12:29 pm

    Victoria: I really liked Almairac's Eau de Gucci too. But like you say: NOT the Bonds! Kevin

    Log in to Reply
  10. Anonymous says:
    2 April 2007 at 12:31 pm

    R: I think Tumulte is more resinous that Gucci PH…Tumulte is deeper, sweeter, rounder, longer lasting. Both do cedar proud.

    Log in to Reply
  11. Anonymous says:
    2 April 2007 at 12:36 pm

    I couldn't agree more! My post today is basically about the same thing, except it's women's fragrances. I adore Gucci Pour Homme! A truly one of a kind fragrance. You described it perfectly.

    Log in to Reply
  12. Anonymous says:
    2 April 2007 at 12:40 pm

    Dusan: In these cold-morning/warm-afternoon spring days I've been adding a touch of Gucci PH to citrus scents…several of the PdNIcolai citruses and even added it to Annick Goutal's Pour Monsieur with a nice effect. I have a tiny spritzer of “peach accord” and that goes great with GPH.

    Log in to Reply
  13. Anonymous says:
    2 April 2007 at 12:41 pm

    Gucci pour homme (76) is an entirely different beast. Lavender, bergamot, woods, moss, castoreum (and other good stuff) mix to create a distinguished manly aroma. Its similar to, but not the same as, another classic for men : Van Cleef pour homme. Sadly, its discontinued but you can sometimes find a few bottles of it on Ebay or in the LA/chicago area shops. Gucci pour homme (2003) smells incomplete to me. Gucci II sounds like it might be for people who didnt care for Gucci I.

    Log in to Reply
  14. Anonymous says:
    2 April 2007 at 7:21 pm

    Kevin – your suggestion of laying this with a peach scent is genious – I would have never thought of it. I'm wearing it with a drop of Fuzzy Peach from the body shop and it smells soooo good. I also like to layer the peach with Bandit.

    Log in to Reply
  15. Anonymous says:
    2 April 2007 at 7:46 pm

    Love GPH – first fragrance that really reminded me of a vintage mens cologne with leather and an almost 'boozy' quality to it (scotch…? maybe it's the 'highball'-esque bottle)

    Tom Ford at his best

    Log in to Reply
  16. Anonymous says:
    2 April 2007 at 7:55 pm

    How on earth did I miss this? There's nothing about this that doesn't sound absolutely perfect to me. And I live to layer, so that makes it even better. I also have a thing for bottles w/ a clean design that have a nice heft in my hand (love the TDCs). My one dilemma was whether or not to take the time to post a comment or race off immediately to find a bottle online.

    Log in to Reply
  17. Anonymous says:
    2 April 2007 at 9:15 pm

    Interestingly enough, almost EVERY fragrance even mildly associated with Tom Ford while he was with the Gucci group is supposedly 'inspired by the classic fragrances of the seventies'… lol i have beauty mag clippings stating this for, Ysl Nu, YSL M7 (which i love 🙂 ) Gucci Envy pour homme, and even Black Orchid… Don't get me wrong, i have nothing against the guy! just thought this was quite interesting!!

    Log in to Reply
  18. Anonymous says:
    2 April 2007 at 11:28 pm

    Yes, that is interesting…but let him use ANY decade for inspiration as long as it's not the 90s! K

    Log in to Reply
  19. Anonymous says:
    2 April 2007 at 11:31 pm

    Hmmm. I have Bandit pour homme…I'll have to see if peach works with that…K

    Log in to Reply
  20. Anonymous says:
    2 April 2007 at 11:33 pm

    Since I rarely go to dept. stores to sniff things, the only reason I “discovered” Gucci Pour Homme was due to a scent strip in a magazine!

    Log in to Reply
  21. Anonymous says:
    3 April 2007 at 12:35 am

    Kevin, I didn't care for this one. I love M7 with a passion but the frankinsence accord in this (whether real or contrived) seems too sweet and has a sort of pineapple edge to it…(think pineapple the next time you apply this and see if I am right). I just couldn't get past it so I gave my bottle away. I also found that it didn't last on my skin but for an hour or two even with a generous application. It, as you said, remained very close to the skin. It also seemed like a very simple fragrance with almost no development. I will take M7 over this any day.

    Log in to Reply
  22. Anonymous says:
    3 April 2007 at 4:12 am

    Somewhat controversially, I find both Gucci pour Homme and M7 a tad tedious after a while. I did love them at first, but they're scents I tire of quickly – that medicinal blast of M7 followed by a powdery, somewhat feminine accord, the one-note wonder of Gucci… And pour Homme is VERY dry on me, as I tend to absorb sweetness a little troo quickly. I'd prefer it as incense than perfume…

    However, I can't disagree with the fact that they're both beautifully executed. I'm intrigued by the campy references, and so now I'm imagining a pantomime quality to them both, based on crude stereotypes of my own making – is Gucci pour homme like an old-fashioned clone, posturing masculinity in his moustache and tight jeans (butch on the streets, femme between the sheets…), and M7 a little old lady dressed up as a virlie young (male) doctor?

    Log in to Reply
  23. Anonymous says:
    3 April 2007 at 9:08 am

    I'll look for that pineapple the next time I wear it…thankfully I LIKE pineapple, k!

    Log in to Reply
  24. Anonymous says:
    3 April 2007 at 9:16 am

    GPH/M7 are very linear so to avoid getting bored I usually wear them for only a few hours…when I'm going out for the night, etc. HA! I'm still trying to wrap my 'morning' mind around the “little old lady” as studly doctor, who no doubt has a big bouquet of pink roses in the waiting room and is wearing lacy drawers. (Can I ever wear M7 again?)

    Log in to Reply
  25. Anonymous says:
    13 December 2007 at 5:50 pm

    Love GPH. Thanks to you and Robin, Kevin, for steering me towards this one. Would never have discovered it otherwise. I think it's great on a woman, and I love your idea of layering it with stone fruit notes. I almost spent $225 on Bois d'Encens, but I like this even better — at nearly 1/10th the cost online.

    P.S I DID try He Wood. You, I think, might like it very much.

    Log in to Reply
  26. Anonymous says:
    26 April 2008 at 6:34 am

    I have a confession to make on this one (it must be the incense smell in the GPH that's making me think of church, lol), but I actually hated this first time I tried it.

    Thing is though, the dry down on this is extraordinary and addictive. I don't really get the pencil shavings thing, but I do smell the incense bit time. I think this is a wonderful fragrance and have finally ordered a bottle – only the 30ml though, because you don't need to overspray this one, and it'll last me ages in rotation with other frags.

    Log in to Reply
  27. baobab says:
    1 December 2009 at 7:47 pm

    i love this Gucci pour homme on a guy’s skin….sexy. one of the perfumes i think sexy..

    Log in to Reply
  28. TakaBeata says:
    14 January 2010 at 7:16 am

    I Love Gucci Rush 2 of Michel Almairac. It is The Best smell…..

    Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

12 July ~ summer reading poll

 

 

Back to Top

Home
Archives
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Books

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2025 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.