• About
  • Login to comment
    • Bluesky
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Archives

Bond no. 9 Bryant Park ~ new fragrance

Posted by Robin on 5 January 2007 28 Comments

Bond no 9 Bryant Park fragranceBond no. 9 will launch Bryant Park, the latest in their series of perfumes celebrating New York's neighborhoods, on March 1:

Imagine an oasis of unflappably serene greenery, improbably nestled in a canyon of skyscrapers down the street from Times Square, in the heart of midtown Manhattan. Now, add chandelier-lit mega-tents, A-list designers, world-class models, press, buyers, and, oh yes, racks and racks of next year’s clothes, and you have the paradox that is today’s Bryant Park—the world’s most frenetic style arena equipped with shrubbery, flower beds, a carousel, and WiFi too.

Bond no. 9's Bryant Park fragrance was created by perfumer Michel Almairac, and is described as "a rose-patchouli concoction with pink pepper added for dissonance" (other notes include lily of the valley, rhubarb, raspberry and amber). Bryant Park comes in a bottle inspired by the "exuberant gossamer silk pre-Mod textiles of the late ‘50s". It will be available in 50 ml ($125) or 100 ml ($185) bottles of Eau de Parfum, or by the ounce in the Bond no. 9 boutiques in New York City. (via press release from Bond no. 9)

Update: see a review of Bond no. 9 Bryant Park.

An aside: Bryant Park (the actual park, that is) has been home to New York's Fashion Week since 1993, but reportedly the event will move to a new location after the Spring 2007 shows next month. You can read more about the park (and see pictures) at its website.

Filed Under: new fragrances

Advertisement


28 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. Anonymous says:
    5 January 2007 at 11:36 am

    Hmmm … doesn't Bond already have a fragrance which speaks to this ad copy? Fashion Avenue or something?

    Off-topic: I finally got a whiff of Pure Linen yesterday, been meaning to since you reviewed it. Fabric softener, totally! Then on my wrist it turns into amonia, not just a slight pungency but a brutal slam that'll clear your sinus. It's a Snuggle bear, you say “awww…” and then you find out it's got a spiked collar, whips and chains.

    Log in to Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    5 January 2007 at 12:08 pm

    Yes, there is a Fashion Avenue also! It is very different…a sort of powdery mimosa.

    I was about to say I never reviewed Pure White Linen, but then I remembered that Marlen did. I'm not a big fan of the original and didn't love the new one either, although it was well done.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Anonymous says:
    5 January 2007 at 2:12 pm

    Bond is killing me with these bottles! I almost bought Chinatown and The Hamptons b/c of their packaging, despite my great dislike for the scents themselves. And this one has a truly amazing bottle…even if the concept of mixing rose, patchouli, LOTV, amber, raspberry and pink pepper sounds a little nauseous to me 🙂

    Log in to Reply
  4. Anonymous says:
    5 January 2007 at 2:27 pm

    Another rose blend from Michel Almairac… sounds good to me! And check out that Pucci-inspired bottle! Fun.

    Log in to Reply
  5. Anonymous says:
    5 January 2007 at 2:37 pm

    (I'm also glad that you included the Bryant Park link. That park is much more than a Fashion Week venue! It's one of my favorite places just to sit and read.)

    Log in to Reply
  6. Anonymous says:
    5 January 2007 at 3:02 pm

    A, I completely agree…to me, this is the most tempting bottle they've done since Chinatown. I might have to have one regardless.

    Hard to say about the notes…not a patch fan, and not a raspberry fan. Hoping it leans more towards sheer than heavy, in which case there might be some hope I'll like it!

    Log in to Reply
  7. Anonymous says:
    5 January 2007 at 3:05 pm

    It is a lovely park, although several times I've found it closed off for private events (other than Fashion Week) when I want to go in.

    And the bottle is absolutely to die for.

    Log in to Reply
  8. Anonymous says:
    5 January 2007 at 4:13 pm

    When I was working in NYC, I used to meet a friend for lunch regularly in Bryant Park.

    They get me coming and going, that's for sure. Not only do I think the bottle is gorgeous, the scent sounds wonderful as well. When, oh when will it end?? LOL!

    Log in to Reply
  9. Anonymous says:
    5 January 2007 at 5:00 pm

    It will never end!!

    Log in to Reply
  10. Anonymous says:
    5 January 2007 at 5:04 pm

    Robin, my friend-

    I always enjoy learning about new things….

    BUT –

    DAMMIT !

    Pretty bottles be damned- these Bond folks are wearing me out with their prodigious output…

    Log in to Reply
  11. Anonymous says:
    5 January 2007 at 10:33 pm

    Am I the only one who finds this bottle to be too gaudy and cartoony ? I much prefer the previous designs.

    And yes, for a niche house, Bond no. 9 does put out a lot of fragrances per year. As a result of this hurried output, very few are worth a purchase.

    Log in to Reply
  12. Anonymous says:
    5 January 2007 at 10:41 pm

    Got it!

    Powerpuff girls — thats what the bottle art initially reminded me off :p

    Log in to Reply
  13. Anonymous says:
    5 January 2007 at 11:30 pm

    It is true, although the pace has been slower for the past year than it was in the beginning….unless I'm mistaken, they did something like 20 scents between 2003-2005 (!), then only 3 new scents in 2006.

    Log in to Reply
  14. Anonymous says:
    5 January 2007 at 11:35 pm

    LOL — I can see that, although what it reminds me of is the very mod minidresses that women were wearing in the 1960s. And as pointed out above, it has a very Pucci feel. Maybe it will be a love it or hate it bottle!

    Log in to Reply
  15. Anonymous says:
    6 January 2007 at 10:37 am

    I love this bottle. I really DID NOT care for West Side. That bottle was so obnoxious.

    Log in to Reply
  16. Anonymous says:
    6 January 2007 at 4:10 pm

    You're right, Robin, when Bond No. 9 launched the line, there were about sixteen fragrances.

    The new Bryant Park bottle is fabulous! Rumor has it that the bottle design was inspired by a pair of vintage shoes that one of our friends wore while visiting Laurice. I'm such a fan of Almairac and his creations, I have no doubt that I will love this one too. Thanks for the photo and the post!

    Log in to Reply
  17. Anonymous says:
    6 January 2007 at 7:32 pm

    We agree…

    I'd rather have fewer, and more spectacular ,perfumes.

    Someone I know once told me that you can't wear the bottle…

    [The only instance of wearing the bottle, Zz, is that Dylan Thomas story, where Sam from the provinces winds up drinking Shalimar, fully clothed in a cold, greasy,dirty bathtub, with an empty Bass bottle on his finger…!]

    Log in to Reply
  18. Anonymous says:
    7 January 2007 at 9:17 am

    I think West Side was another love it or hate it bottle, I know several people who disliked it but also quite a few who loved it. I liked it!

    Log in to Reply
  19. Anonymous says:
    7 January 2007 at 9:21 am

    Pucci shoes, I'm sure!

    Log in to Reply
  20. Anonymous says:
    7 January 2007 at 9:22 am

    Agree with the sentiment entirely…and that goes for the perfume industry as a whole. Too much product, too little innovation.

    Log in to Reply
  21. Anonymous says:
    8 January 2007 at 7:32 pm

    Ohhhh, how interesting! I love rose and patchouli together, but the overlay of fruit has me worried. Red fruits in particular seem to bring out the sweaty side of patch.

    Log in to Reply
  22. Anonymous says:
    9 January 2007 at 11:15 am

    K, Marina has a review of it on Perfume Smellin' Things today. I have only worn it once, and didn't find it sweaty at all, but not sure yet what I think of it.

    Log in to Reply
  23. Anonymous says:
    9 January 2007 at 6:51 pm

    I could see this as smelling very much like Givenchy's “Haute Couture” mixed with artsy oil blends (sort of like “Very Irresistible”, as well). I suppose the rose/patchouli combo will feel very vintage in a flower-child way; Although, I would've expected them to produce a bottle that was a little more similar to “Fire Island” (I think of Vogue fashion spreads of the late 60's/early 70's…more Olivia Hussey and Mia Farrow, than Audrey Hepburn and Suzy Parker). The bottle also reminds me more of “Exclamation” by Coty than something like “Soir de Paris”–which is what I would have associated with the marketing. I suppose “Hamptons” already looks enough like that.

    Log in to Reply
  24. Anonymous says:
    10 January 2007 at 8:19 am

    Have now smelled it, and it isn't any of those things…it is much lighter and less patchouli focused than you'd imagine from the description. There is a review already at Perfume Smellin' Things blog if you want to read one!

    Log in to Reply
  25. Anonymous says:
    12 January 2007 at 2:10 pm

    Those were my exact impressions when I smelled it too, Robin! Very breezy and clean, and the patch is subtle to say the least.

    Log in to Reply
  26. Anonymous says:
    12 January 2007 at 4:38 pm

    Yes, it isn't really what I expected from the description. Will try to review it soon…

    Log in to Reply
  27. Anonymous says:
    13 January 2007 at 2:47 pm

    I'm pleased to hear that “Bryant Park” is lighter than what I anticipated. Whenever I think of an NYC “runway/fashion week” theme, I always imagine Calvin Klein-esque stuff blowing off the runway, circa. 1992-93—and Versace and Chanel scents wafting from the audience. All chic and a little austere, but with hints of spicy flair evident. I'll need to test Bond no. 9's newbie and see how their interpretation compares to how I imagined it. Thanks for always updating us on new goodies!

    Log in to Reply
  28. Anonymous says:
    13 January 2007 at 3:28 pm

    It is a very modern scent, not at all early 1990s, and not a “big statement” kind of fragrance in that sense. It is pretty, but only wore it once very quickly so haven't decided anything about it at all.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

15 March ~ swapmeet

3 April ~ damage poll
26 April ~ splitmeet

3 May ~ spring reading poll
17 May ~ Haiku challenge!

 

Back to Top

Home
Archives
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Books

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2025 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.