• About
  • Login to comment
    • Bluesky
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Archives

Sarah Jessica Parker Lovely ~ perfume review

Posted by Robin on 5 July 2005 64 Comments

Sarah Jessica Parker Lovely fragrance

Lovely is Sarah Jessica Parker’s first fragrance release. It was created by perfumers Laurent Le Guernec and Clement Gavarry. It is due for official launch this August, but is already available at Nordstroms, who have exclusive rights until September. Lovely is described as "a "silky white amber" and has notes of mandarin, bergamot, rosewood, lavender, apple martini, patchouli, paper whites, orchid, cedar, white amber, musk and woods.

The word on the fragrance forums is that Lovely is very similar to Narciso Rodriguez For Her, which I found hard to believe given the list of notes. After trying it, I am not so surprised, but I can’t say just how close they are because I only know what Narciso Rodriguez smells like from reading reviews — one whiff and my throat and nose seize up instantly. An overdose of aldehydes? Something similar happens to me after a long day of perfume shopping, but Narciso is the only fragrance that can do it single handedly.

Lovely starts as a soft citrusy wood scent. There is a touch of lavender, but no corresponding harshness. It dries down to a subdued musky-woods perfume, with distinct notes of rosewood and cedar. The floral notes are extremely muted, the amber is clean, and the patchouli is a mere whisper. I never caught the apple martini at all.

Sarah Jessica Parker said she did not want a perfume that dominated the room, and Lovely fits those requirements: it is a very soft, quiet fragrance, all rounded edges, and it stays relatively close to the skin. It does not interest me personally, but it is very wearable, and I would guess that unlike many celebrity fragrances, it will find fans of all ages. For that matter, it is not at all overtly feminine, and although the bottle and name are not likely to appeal, a man could easily wear it. I predict (not that it requires much foresight) that Ms. Parker will make a pretty penny from it.

Sarah Jessica Parker Lovely is an Eau de Parfum, and the lasting power is excellent. It comes in a 50 ml bottle for $48, or 100 ml for $62. There is also a matching body lotion and a shower gel.

Possibly of interest

Regime des Fleurs Chloe Sevigny Little Flower ~ fragrance review
Carrington Perfumes Forever Krystle ~ fragrance review
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Filed Under: perfume talk
Tagged With: celebrity perfumes, clement gavarry, laurent leguernec, sarah jessica parker

Advertisement


64 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 9:39 am

    You're making it sound really attractive. I love Narciso Rodriguez for Her. I will now feel compelled to try this. Is it possible that SJP has good taste after all? LOL!

    Log in to Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 10:48 am

    This DOES sound nice – only the citrus top sounds doubtful to me. The idea of 'white amber' is attractive, especially to an amber lover like me, and if the florals are subdued, all the better! I do hope I got to sniff this – some celeb scents simply don't make it on wide release over here. (I saw and smelled Paris Hilton for the first (and last) time yesterday – and the fact that I had to write that, as if I'd had my nose in her celebrity cleavage, would be enough to make me loathe the fragrance!) N

    Log in to Reply
  3. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 11:01 am

    J, I find it very tasteful, and am thrilled that she didn't do another fruity floral. It just didn't captivate me, but I wouldn't mind smelling it on someone else.

    And supposedly she is good friends with NR and “approved” his fragrance before it was released, or so I have read, so if you love the one you might love the other.

    Log in to Reply
  4. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 11:04 am

    N, Given that this was released into Nordstrom, which as far as I know doesn't even carry Paris Hilton, or Britney Spears, etc, would think it will be in one of the higher end UK department stores eventually.

    The citrus is very soft, and short-lived. Don't think it would bother anyone.

    Log in to Reply
  5. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 11:40 am

    Thanks so much for the review dear R! It does sound lovely indeed. Not a fan of SJP which is why I was slightly doubtful at first – thought oh dear yet another celebrity scent!! 🙁 Now I think I must try it when I can.

    Hope you are well.

    xoxo

    Log in to Reply
  6. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 11:44 am

    PS the bottle is rather nice. 🙂

    Log in to Reply
  7. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 11:59 am

    I really need to get out and try this. I like NR but often find it too sharp. The paperwhite note in Lovely scares me a little. That one note is usually instant death for me.

    Log in to Reply
  8. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 12:10 pm

    It does sound better than the rest of the recent celebrity releases – I like the comment that it is 'rounded'. I will have to give it a look when we go to Nordies later. I will let you know what I think. Based on the notes – I would normally pass but your review has me at least interested. I agree this will be a hit – at least in the US.

    Log in to Reply
  9. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 12:21 pm

    Hmmm…maybe, maybe not! :):)

    I know that the next time I am at Nordstrom I will test it. I'd love to do a wrist-to-wrist comparison with NR, which I love (so sorry you have that reaction to it, R!).

    I doubt I will buy it, but who cares? Lovely was a best seller before it even hit the shelves.

    Hugs!

    Log in to Reply
  10. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 12:22 pm

    I was at Nordie's on Sunday and was able to sniff SJP's Lovely and I thought it was nice and light – kind of understated. A good fragrance for a warm day. I don't think it smells anywhere near NR For Her which I think is heavy and sharp.

    Log in to Reply
  11. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 12:25 pm

    N, I don't love it by any means, in fact, wondering if that was clear enough above? But it is nicely done.

    Log in to Reply
  12. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 12:26 pm

    If you can find the paperwhites, do let me know! I couldn't. The list of notes, IMHO, offer little clue about what this one smells like.

    Log in to Reply
  13. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 12:27 pm

    F, scored a Britney Spears sample at Sephora and that is my next celebrity test 🙂

    Log in to Reply
  14. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 12:29 pm

    Yes, R, I was very surprised at how many people ordered it in advance unsniffed!!

    Let me know how close they are. My reaction to NR is really strange. I would love to be able to smell it because I usually like Egyptian Musk. Must say that Lovely smells like musk, but not what I think of as Egyptian Musk.

    Log in to Reply
  15. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 12:31 pm

    Thanks so much for commenting! I did not know NR was heavy and sharp, so must go to read the reviews again. I thought it was a light, Egyptian musk based scent.

    Log in to Reply
  16. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 12:40 pm

    Hi,

    In my humble opinion, NR For Her is pretty and at the same time overwhelming. I do have the roll-on NR For Her which I have only applied a handful of times in the past few months and maybe it just my chemistry, but I can't pull off wearing this scent. So, now that roll-on sits on the perfume graveyard side of my vanity table. lol. Have a great day.

    Log in to Reply
  17. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 1:29 pm

    I didn't find it similar to NR either. Amber lovers will be hard pressed to find the amber. It's very soft and light fragrance. Unremarkable I'd say.

    Log in to Reply
  18. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 2:07 pm

    Hi V, would agree, very little amber and nothing groundbreaking or unusual.

    Log in to Reply
  19. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 2:37 pm

    Hi R, just popping in to let you know that this is my latest summer fave. I spritzed it on at Nordy's on Friday (along with NR for her on the other wrist). Didn't like it at all, at first sniff. Another generic dept. store scent, I thought.

    However, after walking around and shopping for an hour or so, Lovely dried down to a sweet, pleasant patchouli on me! My skin must naturally attract this component. I love it, and it works really well with my chemistry. Lovely definitely stays close to the skin, which is how I like my scents. They are for my enjoyment first, and not to impress others.

    I didn't find many similarities to the NR, which I keep trying whenever I spot it. The notes sound promising, but NR just doesn't work for me. Too harsh, and almost headache-inducing.

    Lovely will definitely be a frequent winner in my “summer scent rotation,” which includes Jardin sur le Nil, Banana Republic W, and Extrait de Songe.

    Log in to Reply
  20. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 3:02 pm

    Hmmm. So the gist of it is: hard to detect the amber, don't worry about the paperwhites, hardly any patchouli, citrus notes burn off quickly. So I'm asking myself…what exactly does it smell OF? (Could this be like Omnia, for me the perfume-with-no-smell?)

    BTW, I did a side-by-side of Curious and Matthew Williamson yesterday, and I have to say I liked Curious MUCH better. I look forward to your review of Britney's curiosity!

    Log in to Reply
  21. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 3:10 pm

    This is really compelling me! Wondering now whether I should just go ahead and buy it or wait for it to flood the swap lists… Thanks, R.

    Log in to Reply
  22. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 4:36 pm

    Yay! Fantastic review, I can't wait to try it! I like Narciso Rodriguez For Her so I already had high hopes for this fragrance when others compared it to that.

    Log in to Reply
  23. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 6:27 pm

    K, I am so surprised that you find so much patchouli, which I usually think of myself as attracting…but not in a good way! I really don't get that much patchouli here. Glad you found another winner though. Jardin sur le Nil must be the only scent we both wear!

    Log in to Reply
  24. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 6:29 pm

    N, it smells to me mostly like musk & wood. Bit of all the other things, but not much. It is not a strong scent in any case.

    Will review the BS Curious sometime soon, but looks like we'll have to wait here for the Matthew Williamson! Don't have high hopes for it, even he doesn't sound like he loves it, LOL!!

    Log in to Reply
  25. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 6:29 pm

    G, Why rush?? Surely you have enough fragrance to tide you over until you can smell it, LOL!

    Log in to Reply
  26. Anonymous says:
    5 July 2005 at 6:30 pm

    S, hope you will review it too! It looks like some people think they are the same & some people don't .

    Log in to Reply
  27. Anonymous says:
    6 July 2005 at 7:55 am

    I am one of the people who does not smell the similarity to NR at all! It was love at first sniff with Lovely for me. It is definitely not a dominant musk scent on me, and my skin always amplifies any musk notes. Lovely was a most pleasant surprise, I believe much thought went into this scent. It's balanced and blended and the notes just flow, and it does not have that synthetic attitude that many deparment store fragrances seem to have, especially newer ones.

    I have to say I am breezing through my bottle rather quickly and will definitely repurchase.

    Log in to Reply
  28. Anonymous says:
    6 July 2005 at 10:35 am

    Hi P,

    So happy you've found another winner!!

    Very curious now — what would you say is the dominant note or notes?

    Log in to Reply
  29. Anonymous says:
    9 October 2005 at 6:28 pm

    After SJP was on Oprah last week and debuted the perfume on nationwide tv, I'm sure there's more interest. I've already heard ladies of all ages asking about it, and to me it's good and unique. Ladylike, but not at all overly feminine.

    Log in to Reply
  30. Anonymous says:
    10 October 2005 at 9:22 am

    According to my local Nordstrom, it has been a very big seller for them — so the Oprah show was no doubt just the icing on the cake 😉

    Log in to Reply
  31. Anonymous says:
    19 November 2005 at 11:12 am

    i found it to be a very fresh scent, which can be worn day or nite. I quite like it

    Log in to Reply
  32. Anonymous says:
    19 November 2005 at 7:54 pm

    The more celebrity fragrances I have tried this year — and there certainly are quite a few of them — the more convinced I am that this is the best of the current lot.

    Log in to Reply
  33. Anonymous says:
    29 November 2005 at 7:41 am

    I finally got a sample of Lovely. I don't care for the initial notes, but as it dries down, I find it, well, lovely. It has a nice woody softness. I really like it, but not so sure if I would buy a bottle. I have worn it about four times now, and I must say it is growing on me with each try. Who knows, maybe by the time my sample is gone, I will want a bottle.

    Log in to Reply
  34. Anonymous says:
    29 November 2005 at 12:54 pm

    K, am still surprised at how many of my friends who I think of as “niche fragrance snobs” have bought Lovely. It really is a very well done scent!

    Log in to Reply
  35. Anonymous says:
    3 January 2006 at 10:23 am

    It is a remarkable scent! I am one of those niche fragrance snobs and I absolutely love it, I have hardly worn anything else this fall. SJP also seems to have a much more profound interest in and knowledge of perfumery than, say, Paris Hilton, so I'm not at all surprised that it turned out so good. I'm sure you all read the interview with her in New York Times a couple of months ago? She knows exactly what she's doing, and why.

    Log in to Reply
  36. Anonymous says:
    3 January 2006 at 11:28 am

    Completely agree, SJP seems very interested, PH is probably in it for the money (which she couldn't possibly need anyway). Loved that article in the NYT, and very much looking forward to SJP's next release.

    Log in to Reply
  37. Anonymous says:
    13 January 2006 at 3:35 pm

    I've loved Lovely from the first sniff. I've never had a fragrance that I've received so many complements on. On me, it's soft, but very fresh and simple and I love simplicity. I admire SJP and I would say this is a definite winner. I can't stay away from it.

    Log in to Reply
  38. Anonymous says:
    13 January 2006 at 10:59 pm

    This one has so many fans that I have a feeling it will still be around in 10 years — and I don't think that will be true for many of the current celebrity releases. Glad you found a scent you love!

    Log in to Reply
  39. Anonymous says:
    5 May 2006 at 2:32 pm

    Oh my, I just adore Lovely. So soft and pleasant; I can't imagine this offending anyone. Doesn't scream “perfume”…just wraps you in a comforting aura. It probably won't have people asking, “What perfume are you wearing?”, but I think that's the point! 😉 I have to admit that I had high hopes for this one, because I'm a closet SJP fan from Sex and the City, and I've read many interviews about her in which she mentions her love of fragrance. I think this perfume is very personal to Sarah, and in my opinion, she hit the mark.

    Log in to Reply
  40. Anonymous says:
    7 May 2006 at 6:28 pm

    Completely agree that she hit the mark…it is very well done. Still hoping she'll be a bit more adventurous with her next fragrance!

    Log in to Reply
  41. Anonymous says:
    8 May 2006 at 7:33 am

    R, I totally agree! Maybe now that she's gotten her first launch out of the way, she'll feel more adventurous. 🙂

    Log in to Reply
  42. Anonymous says:
    12 October 2006 at 11:20 pm

    Had this one. Got tired of it after a couple of days. Took it back. The lasting power SUCKS!!! 28 minutes TOPS!!!

    Log in to Reply
  43. Anonymous says:
    13 October 2006 at 9:21 am

    Wow, it lasts nearly all day on me, that is odd.

    Log in to Reply
  44. Anonymous says:
    1 October 2007 at 2:04 pm

    I love Lovely. It isn't heavy or sweetly sickening like so many fragrances these days. It is a sheer scent that I can wear anywhere and I get many compliements and inquiries as to what I am wearing. It isn't adventerous but it isn't going to be a flash in the pan either like many celebrity scents these days. I think this one is simple yet complex enought to stand the test of time. It is in my mind what I consider a “classic” fragrance.

    Log in to Reply
  45. Anonymous says:
    1 October 2007 at 9:54 pm

    It is really nicely done. Too soon to say if it will stand the test of time — there is so much competition at the fragrance counters these days — but it has kept its following longer than many of the celeb scents.

    Log in to Reply
  46. Anonymous says:
    1 December 2007 at 2:44 am

    I love the scent and receive many compliments on it. It's funny because I initially didn't care for it at all. I prefer the body serum, it is much smoother than the alcohol-based spray. It also lasts forever on the skin. It is a very classic scent and I think it better designed than most too. It has a very complex concept and range, and develops very well.

    Log in to Reply
  47. Anonymous says:
    1 December 2007 at 7:00 pm

    I like body serums too, although I haven't yet tried this one. I do find the scent frequently fades after a year or so though, if it is silicone-based, so I don't buy them any more.

    Log in to Reply
  48. Anonymous says:
    26 February 2008 at 10:55 pm

    According to my sources in the fragrance industry, this particular scent is extremely well-respected by perfumers, despite the “celebrity” associations. It's often suggested for those who are looking for a lighter, cleaner version of Narciso Rodriguez.

    Log in to Reply
  49. Anonymous says:
    27 February 2008 at 12:01 pm

    Thanks 🙂

    Log in to Reply
  50. bclay says:
    31 December 2009 at 5:52 pm

    How can you say the bottle and name are not likely to appeal? I love the name and the bottle.. and the fragrance. I always get asked what I’m wearing, people like it on me, and my husband loves it. It smells very fresh …. like you just stepped out of the shower.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      1 January 2010 at 12:21 pm

      I said the bottle & name were not likely to appeal to a man, but that a man could certainly wear it.

      Log in to Reply
  51. Subhuman says:
    5 February 2010 at 3:38 pm

    I’m intrigued to try this – I’ve recently gotten over my young-male squeamishness about wearing women’s fragrances, and am now on the lookout for perfumes that doesn’t smell overtly feminine or “girly”, just pleasant and interesting. Anything with a subdued, clean musky base tends to smell great on my skin, so this sounds like it could work for me. Will sniff ASAP.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      5 February 2010 at 4:03 pm

      Do try it. And also check out the Narciso Rodriguez line — NR For Her & Essence.

      Log in to Reply
      • Subhuman says:
        9 March 2010 at 2:56 am

        Finally tried Lovely during a frantic bit of tester spritzing at the drugstore, and yep, it was a winner. Subtle, blessedly unsweetened, and smooth as glass. I can see wearing it on those days when my usual power scents strike an off-note and I just want something more understated and…well, nice. (I can’t constantly subject the world to Obsession and Azzaro, it wouldn’t be couth.)

        Incidentally, during the drugstore trip I sprayed Elizabeth Arden’s Red Door on my other hand, and it was like kissing Lovely goodnight and coming face to face with her bitchy twin sister after she’s had a few. My first scrubber!

        Log in to Reply
        • Robin says:
          9 March 2010 at 5:44 pm

          So glad you liked it, and that’s so funny about Red Door!

          Log in to Reply
  52. smcnama5 says:
    20 April 2010 at 8:35 pm

    I find the scent to be perfect for me. I recall finding a “sample” in a trade magazine about a month before my wedding. After a quick sniff and then rubbing it on my wrist, I went off to work. The first gentleman that I encountered commented, ” Your fragrance is lovely, dear.” The name said it all for me. I went out and bought a bottle! Guess what I was wearing on my wedding day.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      21 April 2010 at 9:43 am

      Nice, thanks for sharing!

      Log in to Reply
  53. Beautifully_Inked says:
    6 December 2010 at 1:40 pm

    I love this perfume. I have been wearing it for 2 years now (and I’m ready to wear something new.)

    You are correct about it being something that men can wear, my husband does sometimes.

    I always go to your website if I am on the hunt for a new smell.

    I hope you are well!

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      7 December 2010 at 5:53 pm

      Thank you, glad to hear we can help!

      Log in to Reply
  54. scents4me says:
    6 February 2011 at 12:11 pm

    I am going to go buy this today to try. I am still experimenting with Rose the One as well…

    We shall see. Take one back? Keep them both? 😉

    Log in to Reply
  55. cleopatra says:
    29 April 2011 at 11:11 am

    I realy love this perfume. This is my first perfume that I bought. Me myself are quite fussy when choosing fragrance. For me, the smells that really suits a persons is… when there is a connection between the smells and the user. A chemistry. This shown someones personality.
    Lovely really impress me. It is musky…. quiet…warm…and close to skins…but never loose its freshness in its own way. Really comfort…;)

    Log in to Reply
  56. dchristiok says:
    6 January 2013 at 2:05 pm

    I bought a bottle at Ross. I’ve worn it a few times, but my interest in it is low-neutral. It smells, to me, like Aqua Net or one of those aerosol perfumes from my youth. It is a familiar scent, but not really a great scent. Sometimes I layer it with Bulgari Omnia just to be confusing.

    Log in to Reply
    • dchristiok says:
      8 January 2013 at 6:36 pm

      Actually, this smells really nice on my bra at the end of the day. And it doesn’t embarrass me in public, or in private.

      Log in to Reply
  57. JacquieDS says:
    12 September 2016 at 7:01 am

    Does anyone still rave about this perfume or is it too old and cheap now?
    I like the scent but unsure…
    Suggestions?

    Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

15 March ~ swapmeet

3 April ~ damage poll
26 April ~ splitmeet

3 May ~ spring reading poll
17 May ~ Haiku challenge!

 

Back to Top

Home
Archives
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Books

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2025 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.