• About
  • Login to comment
    • Facebook
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Perfumers
  • Perfume Houses
  • Shop for perfume
  • Resources

He Said/She Said ~ Strange Invisible Perfumes Musc Botanique

Posted by Robin on 8 October 2008 16 Comments

Strange Invisible Perfumes Musc Botanique perfume

Musc Botanique is the latest launch from the all-natural Strange Invisible Perfumes line. As I've said here before, I don't really care if my fragrances are all-natural or not, but I'm a big fan of Strange Invisible Perfumes; perfumer Alexandra Balahoutis, who founded the brand, has created some really unusual and compelling fragrances. With Musc Botanique, she "wanted to do something clean that also had that subtle animalistic quality"; the result is a unisex scent that includes notes of geranium, white amber, angelica and frankincense.

I think of Kevin's taste in fragrance as being fairly similar to my own — we don't always love the same things, but it's rare that we have fundamental disagreements on the basic merits of a fragrance (although it occurred to me as I typed this that perhaps Kevin does not see it that way at all). We disagreed so radically on Musc Botanique that I thought it was worth offering up both of our takes:

He said: Sour, dour and drab, Musc Botanique is Virginia Woolf in perfume form; it depresses me. Musc Botanique’s green notes (pleasant for all of 6 seconds) and botanical musks smell “off” — as if an All-Natural! Organic! herbal perfume oil has been spilled onto a damp, used washcloth that’s been balled up and “lost” at the bottom of your laundry hamper for a week. The unfresh vibe of this scent is not sexy or enticing to me; the plant-derived musk has a stale, slightly foody smell about it, and there’s a hint of sweet “medicine” in the extreme dry-down.

With its rapid development, lack of complexity, and a sickly, down-at-the-heels vibe, the best thing I can say about Musc Botanique is that it disappears quickly. After wearing Musc Botanique all day, I feel I need: a hug, a warm bubble bath and a boozy, rich cup of hot chocolate — with a Vitamin B12 injection on the side.

She said: It is perhaps because I think of Kevin and I as having such similar tastes that the diss to Virginia Woolf came as such a shock, and my first draft included a spirited defense on her behalf. On later reflection, I decided I'd rather not debate her merits in the comments — if any of the rest of ya'll think of Virginia Woolf as sour, dour and drab, don't even tell me — and I'd best stick to the fragrance at hand.

Musc Botanique opens very green and very herbal, and more than a little sharp; Kevin accuses it of being "pleasant for all of 6 seconds", but in my household, it was the opening that caused consternation ("bug spray", according to several of the innocent bystanders who were forced to take a whiff). Kevin is right that the top notes don't last long, and what's left after 5 minutes is what you're going to smell for the duration: a mild, smooth skin scent, vegetal without calling up any particular plant (or even smelling particularly green), lightly honeyed, with an almost-creamy finish.

Tom over at Perfume Smellin' Things called it "definitely, wonderfully.. odd", and it is odd: you'll probably be able to pick out some of the components if you try, but it smells somehow sui generis — it could be some lone natural material you've never encountered before. It doesn't smell clean to me, and it doesn't really smell sexy, and it doesn't smell like musk: it just smells like itself. I think it smells great; it's one of those scents that has me wandering around with my arm held up to my nose all day. It's probably my second favorite in the line, right after the stunning (but arguably much less wearable) Black Rosette.

I meant to try layering Musc Botanique, but never found the time — note to fragrance industry: how about a 4 week launch freeze so we can all catch up? I will say that I found the lasting power of the Eau de Parfum amazing for a natural perfume, in fact, about the same as for a synthetic.

Strange Invisible Perfumes Musc Botanique is available in 7.5 ml Parfum ($185) or 50 ml Eau de Parfum ($135). For buying information, see the listing for Strange Invisible Perfumes under Perfume Houses.

Possibly of interest

Strange Invisible Perfumes Shadows in the Garden ~ new fragrance
Strange Invisible Perfumes Love Letter ~ new fragrance
Strange Invisible Perfumes Emerald Moss ~ new fragrance

Filed Under: perfume talk
Tagged With: natural perfume, strange invisible perfumes

Advertisement


16 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. Anonymous says:
    8 October 2008 at 2:21 pm

    Wow, this sounds like it could have the same effect on me as Jicky does – interesting pond water.
    I need to revisit musk a bit. I have a few around. Il Profumo Musc Bleu I noted as “garden variety hippie musk” (lol) but I love Musc Maori for the chocolate oddness. Time to go through my essential oils drawer and see what the heck is in there – I know there are musks!

    Log in to Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    8 October 2008 at 2:33 pm

    Okay, so what you're saying is, “You just need to TRY it.” Will do. *salutes* :-)

    Am I the only one who thinks the bottle and label are just a leetle too similar to Musc Ravageur?

    Log in to Reply
  3. Anonymous says:
    8 October 2008 at 2:42 pm

    So happy to see the he said/she said, it's fun to see 2 such different reviews at once and means it's a must sniff for me.

    Log in to Reply
  4. Anonymous says:
    8 October 2008 at 2:46 pm

    Interesting pond water! Ok, I chalk you up on Kevin's side (although he likes Jicky, and so do I).

    Log in to Reply
  5. Anonymous says:
    8 October 2008 at 2:47 pm

    Yes! Although presumably that's what we're saying about everything, with the possible exception of Britney Spears Midnight Fantasy ;-)

    I did not think of the Frederic Malle packaging when I saw the SIP EdP bottles, but I guess so — basic font, plain-ish bottle & label.

    Log in to Reply
  6. Anonymous says:
    8 October 2008 at 3:25 pm

    Glad you liked it, and hope you'll like the MB.

    Log in to Reply
  7. Anonymous says:
    8 October 2008 at 4:25 pm

    I always love the He Said/She Said reviews! So fun.

    This sounds like a must smell, perhaps while reading “Mrs. Dalloway” (or the grossly under-valued “The Years”).

    Log in to Reply
  8. Anonymous says:
    8 October 2008 at 5:13 pm

    I want to like Jicky, really, just on principle!! Just having a tough go of it….

    Log in to Reply
  9. Anonymous says:
    8 October 2008 at 5:30 pm

    Seems to me that all you can expect “on principle” is to respect it — actually liking fragrances just on principle is too much to ask!

    Log in to Reply
  10. Anonymous says:
    8 October 2008 at 5:32 pm

    I loved The Years, but haven't re-read it in quite some time, should do that. Mrs. Dalloway & To The Lighthouse I revisit regularly.

    Log in to Reply
  11. Anonymous says:
    8 October 2008 at 6:18 pm

    I think the Black Rosette is very wearable! I think I'm going to send SIP an email begging for an eau de parfum in B.R.

    At any rate, it sounds like Musc Botanique is must-sniff for me.

    Log in to Reply
  12. Anonymous says:
    8 October 2008 at 7:21 pm

    I'd like to see that one in EdP too, and also the Lady Day one (that they've renamed, but I don't know the new name).

    Log in to Reply
  13. Anonymous says:
    9 October 2008 at 5:36 am

    Do we have musk times now? Everybody around me now wants to have at least one musk. I am not against it. :-)

    Log in to Reply
  14. Anonymous says:
    9 October 2008 at 10:08 am

    There do seem to be lots of musk releases lately, but then again, there are lots of releases period.

    Log in to Reply
  15. Anonymous says:
    9 October 2008 at 1:17 pm

    Hey, Robin. I'm with you both in regard to Virginia Woolf and to Musc Botanique.

    I tend to like most musks, but this one is unlike anything I have ever smelled before. It feels pretty bioactive to me, and I imagine it could take a nasty turn if you had the wrong skin chemistry. But for me it's really wonderful. I have been slowly working away at restoring the remants of an ancient New England garden, and this scent seems all of a piece with that–interesting herbs like sweet cicely, lovage and angelica growing among ferns and mosses, spots of color in the shade from foxgloves and musk mallows and a few clumps of different artemesias growing where the sun hits. I suppose it might look drab speeding past in a car (or in these parts, more likely a pickup truck) but nose close to the ground it is quite transfixing. As with reading Virginia Woolf, I find that smelling this rewards close attention.

    Log in to Reply
  16. Anonymous says:
    9 October 2008 at 3:25 pm

    “Bioactive' is a good description, and I love your comparison to your restored garden, thanks!

    Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

From NST at Twitter

  • "LVMH's record-breaking results driven by Sephora" (cosmetics business) https://t.co/NKkwcZBJeW,
  • "‘Bionic nose’ may help people experiencing smell loss, researchers say" (washington post) https://t.co/M9nX7UVMpS,
  • "It costs up to $100,000 a kilo and Queensland farmers are growing it for luxury perfume" (sydney morning herald) https://t.co/gs8w4s7zpS,
  • "Francis Kurkdjian, creator of Baccarat Rouge 540: ‘People went crazy and it sold out immediately’" (el pais) https://t.co/cxGHgzgFd3,
  • "Yves Saint Laurent Launches New Perfume-Inspired NFTs" (business2community) https://t.co/dOaVNjWgsd https://t.co/vQs5nmJ1yH,

Browse by...

Topic

Perfume talk New fragrances
Shopping Books :: News
Body products Home fragrance
Polls Another subject

Date

December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022

Prior months

Author

Robin Jessica
Angela Kevin
Erin Guest Author

Tag

Celebrity perfumes
Cheap thrills
Collector bottles
Perfumista tip series
Video
The complete tag index

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

4 January ~ damage poll
4 February ~ winter reading poll

TBA April ~ swap meet

Back to Top

Home
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy

Shop for Perfume Online
Perfume Shopping in New York
Perfume Shopping in London
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Links
Perfume Books
Fragrance Awards

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2023 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.