• About
  • Login to comment
    • Bluesky
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Archives

Liz Zorn LZ Artisan Collection ~ new fragrances

Posted by Robin on 12 August 2007 32 Comments

Liz Zorn Man Spray fragranceLiz Zorn has launched the LZ Artisan Collection, consisting of 5 new scents in Eau de Parfum:

Man Spray (shown) ~ " An extraordinarily smooth natural masculine fragrance...that can only be described as Vintage Chic." Notes feature bergamot, French lavender, clary sage, cedar, spices, geranium, sandalwood, patchouli, hay absolute, amber, ambrette seed, oak moss, vetiver, tonka bean and vanilla.

Citrine Rose ~ "A conceptual scent, created around the idea of following the evolution of a rose from thorn to blossom." Notes include citrus, spices, geranium, carnation, rose otto, rose absolute, amber, cedar, sandalwood, frankincense, vanilla and musk.

Jhango Bay ~ "This scent is rich in Caribbean spices, masculine florals, warm woods, balsams and musky animalic undertones." Notes include citrus, Jamaican bay rum, spices, rose absolute, jasmine absolute, cedarwood, sandalwood, natural musk and ambergris.

Palomino ~ "Contrary to the obvious this fragrance gets it's name from the palomino grape", and featuring notes of clary sage, juniper, cabreuva, galbanum, clove, cinnamon, amber, vanilla, pomegranate, florals, cedarwood, sandalwood and musk

Allegory ~ "A twist on the traditional Lavender Fragrance", with notes of marigold, French lavender, orange flower, lavender absolute, lavender concrete, vanilla, spices, birch tar, leather and woods.

Sizes and prices vary; samples are available for $6.50 each. See the Liz Zorn website for details.

Filed Under: new fragrances
Tagged With: soivohle

Advertisement


32 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. Anonymous says:
    11 August 2007 at 11:57 pm

    1. L'Artisan. LZ Artisan. This is not good.

    2. Roses do not evolve from thorn to blossom. Nope.

    3. “Man Spray.” Well.

    4. What's a masculine floral?

    Log in to Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 4:55 am

    What an hideous bottle. Even if the juice was great… it sounds to cheap to try.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 7:11 am

    Absolutely! The label looks like for a paint thinner.

    Log in to Reply
  4. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 9:06 am

    Hey, guys.

    Lighten up !

    Liz is amazingly gifted, and her stuff is real quality- no doubt.

    Couldn't suggestions be made a little more constructively ?

    BTW- she doesn't pay me to say this.

    It's just that I weary of Miaow Mix responses.

    Let's try to play nicely …

    Log in to Reply
  5. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 12:04 pm

    Hey, I like “Man Spray” — we need more funny in the world of fragrance!

    Log in to Reply
  6. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 12:05 pm

    Have to agree with C. below — this is a very small, relatively new indie line, and you guys are a way tough crowd!

    Log in to Reply
  7. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 12:33 pm

    The day so far has been eventful to say the least. Someone that I don’t know buzzed me up this morning to alert me to a dissing; and under normal circumstances I would not pay it any mind. But this kinda reminds me of some of the reviews that I used to get for my artwork. I love it when people speak their minds. And have made a career out of speaking mine. So a good old fashioned thrashing is par for the course. My art dealer used to love nasty reviews. Brought folks into the gallery in droves. wondering what all the fuss was about. And the reference to paint thinner, not bad, not bad at all. The label is meant to tie in the links between my thirty year career in the arts and my work as a perfumer. The primary colors, the hard edges, bold graphics. That is what I do. If you like it you like it, if you don’t you don’t. That is the way of the world. Everyone has an opinion. When we were testing out new designs and packaging ideas (mostly on the customers who visit our boutique) this new design was well received, as well as the name for the Man Spray. We get a cross section of people from all walks of life, so to single out any particular group would not be possible. I trust the people who actually know and use our products, and they (for the most part) made this call, and I/we stand by it. We are working with some interesting folks right now to create an exhibition that pairs conceptualism in visual art to conceptualism in scent art. There’s really more to it than just the fluff of label design, or who gets the bigger market share, and all of the commerce relates aspects to perfumery, including marketing and hype. I know that if I personally made perfume purchases according to labeling and packaging, their might be two bottles on my dresser, maybe just one. I am a tough critic as well. So I get it. No problem.

    Peace, Zz Zorn

    Log in to Reply
  8. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 12:40 pm

    I have to agree with C. “Man Spray”does sound fun, though – reminds me of “The Man Show”, although I am guessing that's not what LZ had in mind.

    Log in to Reply
  9. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 12:51 pm

    I guess it pays to be a little thick-skinned in this business, eh? It's interesting to see that perfumers such as LZ are actually paying attention to what gets said in forums such as these. (“You are soooo busted!” 🙂 )

    LZ – Curious as to what that one bottle is that you'd have on your dresser if you purchased by packaging alone.

    Log in to Reply
  10. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 12:53 pm

    LOL — I hope that is not what she had in mind! Can't imagine a decent fragrance coming out of *that*…

    Log in to Reply
  11. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 1:52 pm

    (for the record, I have not been paid to post this comment)

    I'm in the final stages of preparing a post to my own fragrance blog and was alerted by blogarithm that Now Smell This had been updated. Being ever curious, I checked it out and was rather dismayed at some of the comments for Liz and her new fragrance launches. I believe that Liz is an honest perfumer who loves what she does with a passion. From the comments I couldn't tell that anyone had actually tried the five new fragrances. I do have samples of each of them and here is my take. Palomino is probably my favorite of the five. I do have to get past the green opening notes, but once those quiet, the spicy floral is breathtaking and works very well with my chemistry. Citrine Rose has been a formula Liz has been working on all summer and it's an authentic rose with a definite twist…that Frankincense adds mystery and depth. And actually my husband choose this as his favorite.

    Constructive criticism is invaluable – it helps us not to become so ego centered in ourselves that we cant see the truth about who we are and what we've created. Liz seems to have taken these comments in stride and in fact, they will most likely pique even more interest in her new collection.

    Continued sucess to each of you!

    Log in to Reply
  12. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 2:11 pm

    I don't know her stuff yet.

    But give the gal a break! I love the name of the scent “Man Spray”, totally cool and whimisical and comical. The scent industry DOES need to lighten up and even us buying public too. Really. Just my opinion.

    Us Indie perfumers can be just as good if not better than the highly visable, overrated, highly expensive, mainstream scent houses most of us love so well.

    I wish her great success!

    Log in to Reply
  13. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 3:39 pm

    all your packaging is really bad madam, boxes espesially ugly =(

    sorry about saying that…

    but juse is heaven, everyone of them wich I happend to try

    Log in to Reply
  14. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 3:47 pm

    “Huh?”

    I barely did not understand a word you said with all those grammatical errors in your post.

    “Ahem”…sorry, had to make a comment on your comment here.

    I truly bugs me when others throw stones as they have here.

    It takes a lot of guts, sweat and true hard work to do what Liz is doing.

    Even if most of you think her packaging and stuff isn't attractive.

    I, too, sell stuff on First in Fragrance and believe me, I know my packaging sucks to high hell truly. Her's is rather nice compared to mine. But I intend to improve on the packaging very very soon.

    But to say the things you're all saying…. take a good look at yourselves in the mirror, REALLY.

    Shallow…… truly shallow.

    Judging a book by it's cover. Not a way to live one's life. You can miss many great opportunites and experiences if you judge others and things by looks alone.

    Log in to Reply
  15. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 5:40 pm

    LOL at “you are soooo busted”!

    Log in to Reply
  16. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 5:44 pm

    My 2 cents: I do think indie perfumers deserve something more of a break than large lines, esp. on such matters as packaging, but also, when you put your products out there in the public arena, you can't expect that everyone is going to like what you do. Having others criticize your packaging is way better than having others say your perfumes are trash, at any rate.
    People are welcome to add more comments, but any more comments insulting other commenters will be deleted.

    Log in to Reply
  17. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 5:48 pm

    Mando, I love you for your point of view.

    I also think Liz is a jewel not to take this personally…

    But this is America, and I hate censorship, so I've got to live with whatever gets dished out.

    I wear scents made by American indie-perfumers, and I've got to tell you – packaging or no- good jus is JUST THAT.

    My favorite vignette deals w/ Mr. Malle leaning in for a sniff of Madame X recently.

    And the positive responses of perfumistas to scents they've never tried, by relatively unknown perfumers.

    I've sent samples all over the globe [literally], and the responses are heartening; artisanry is NOT dead, it's alive and flourishing in our own country.

    We ought to be grateful.

    Opinions are welcome; jerkdom is unnecessary.

    Log in to Reply
  18. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 6:39 pm

    I hate censorship too. Even if it's regarding opinions. I'll stop my bombastic attack towards that fellow poster or anyone else here. I will admit to being very rude of myself here. But I have to admit to being very touchy when it comes to certain subjects such as this. I know packaging is very important in product placement/marketing and it's allure to the buying public. I am very attracted to a beatiful bottle myself just as the next person. I have a huge commercial perfume bottle collection to attest to that due to my admiration towards the art of the perfume bottle. But in the end, it's the juice inside that counts. You can have a gorgeous bottle made by Baccarat or Lalique; but if the juice smells like one of Paris Hilton's scent's, well, then you wasted your money, IMO. So there I go with my opinion and disdain towards another person's scent line. I'm no better. But at least I admit freely here. Unlike some whom won't admit to a single fault if their lives depended on it.

    I'm done, over and out….

    Log in to Reply
  19. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 7:53 pm

    Masculine floral?

    You have a lot to learn, grasshopper.

    Log in to Reply
  20. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 8:10 pm

    I think people might be shocked to hear that a lot of those designer fragrances on the market pay more for the manufacture of the packaging than the cost of the juice itself.

    I couldn't care less what the packaging looks like…prime example is YSL's Rive Gauche pour Homme–plastic bottle with a fancy graphic print overlay. Fine by drugstore standards, but who cares, the juice is superb!

    Log in to Reply
  21. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 8:25 pm

    Robin, Robin, with the heart of a lion… This whole debacle reminds me of an unfortunate and terrifying incident that occurred a few months back in the programmer blogging commmunity. An intelligent, knowledgable, and accessible (and female) blogger was threatened physically by a bunch of less self-individuated (and, presumably, male) commenters. Law-enforcement was notified, and the FBI got involved because of the horrendous masochistic crap that was written about her. This gem-to-programmers has not posted since, because a few unethical and morally-suspect forum managers failed to do what Robin has done here; deleted deleterious comments. Now, I do not mean to imply that the situation here has reached such horrific proportions..but for God's sake! Aren't we lucky that Robin has stepped up to the plate?!? Glad to know you've got our backs, Girl!

    Log in to Reply
  22. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 8:37 pm

    Oh, you are kind but I'd be ashamed to be compared — that was truly horrifying, and I completely sympathized with her decision to stop blogging. Why blog to such a nasty audience?

    Perfume people, I like to think, are way nicer than all that. And haven't deleted anything yet, but there are several “verging on insult” posts above and if they get any closer to the mark, I will. This place is usually very kind and well-behaved and I like to keep it that way.

    But I do understand why those who have a stake in indie perfumery feel insulted. And also understand why others felt free to criticize. We have packaging/design issues criticized here quite literally on a daily basis without causing any stir, so there was not reason anyone would assume they had to be more circumspect than usual.

    Log in to Reply
  23. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 10:16 pm

    Honestly, my only quibbles are with the similarity to l'Artisan — I find it confusing at a glance — and the supposed evolution of a rose. “Man Spray” is a hoot, and I don't much care about the packaging. Beautiful bottles are appreciated, but a current favorite sprays from a plain plastic bottle, wears a pc-generated label, and cost about $10 (including shipping). If the juice is fine, I'll be grateful.

    Log in to Reply
  24. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 10:44 pm

    I did not mean to insult anyone and I do appreciate Liz’s work very much, as well as yours Mando-your frags are well done too; but bad packaging limits your market opportunity even for indie frags market; makes people sort of angry 😉 and not as willing to spend money– sort of like someone’s unsophisticated language abilities bugs some people 😉

    Log in to Reply
  25. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 10:59 pm

    L, thought you'd like “Man Spray”, actually! Now I want to know what that $10 favorite is?

    Log in to Reply
  26. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 11:03 pm

    Actually Mando you confirmed my point by overreacting on my misspelled post, you want it pretty and grammatically correct –>“good package” and probably because of my tiresome English -> “bad package” you overlooked my comment on frags themselves

    Log in to Reply
  27. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 11:05 pm

    Nicely said, thanks!

    Log in to Reply
  28. Anonymous says:
    12 August 2007 at 11:14 pm

    Most respectfully ask that if you want to argue w/ Mando, go contact him on his website 🙂

    Log in to Reply
  29. Anonymous says:
    13 August 2007 at 12:05 am

    Really, I have nothing to say about LZ Artisan (except that the bottles look perfectly decent to me!) But, I have to ask, because of my illogical, stubborn refusal to haunt the MUA board, and to program etc.: who is this persecuted blogger? This sounds truly terrible, and I have a awful feeling that I know who it is. Robin, please feel free to email me if for any reason I was not to ask questions about this incident publicly.

    Log in to Reply
  30. Anonymous says:
    13 August 2007 at 6:49 am

    When I see 'Man Spray', all I can think of is Ron Burgundy ;-D

    Log in to Reply
  31. Anonymous says:
    13 August 2007 at 9:32 am

    The incident got widespread publicity within the tech blogging community, and even in the mainstream press, so can't think of any reason to keep it secret. Check out:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6499095.stm

    …and a google search will turn up loads more.

    Log in to Reply
  32. Anonymous says:
    13 August 2007 at 9:33 am

    Had to google RB — looks funny!

    Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

15 March ~ swapmeet

3 April ~ damage poll
26 April ~ splitmeet

3 May ~ spring reading poll
17 May ~ Haiku challenge!

 

Back to Top

Home
Archives
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Books

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2025 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.